legacyzero
Banned
I agree Sess.
Wow, Nintendo. I'm so confused.
Wow, Nintendo. I'm so confused.
*looks at Konamis 2012 conference*So if they just cut "Direct" out of the title and air "NintendoDirectE3 Presentation 2013," it'll be fine?
Nintendo announces new news to fans first, everybody else relies on press. What's the takeaway? If anything, the takeaway is that Nintendo cares about their fans first and foremost. I consider that a good thing. I liked learning about X and other games before the press reported on it. The press obviously doesn't like it, but who gives a shit? I sure as hell don't. And the press will still report on everything even remotely worthwhile, so I don't think Nintendo really cares, either.
Conjecture, based on what?
Conjecture, based on what?
What are their press conferences then? Last I checked, they still try to tug on fan heartstrings there with either announcements of new games like Kid Icarus or Legend of Zelda. They still announce services coming to their systems. They still go on long winded speeches about their philosophies and why they do what they do.Sessler is 100% right. Direct IS an echo chamber, like Sessler said, that serves no purpose but to fellate already existing Nintendo fans. This is one of those "what were they THINKING!?" moments.
So if they just cut "Direct" out of the title and air "NintendoDirectE3 Presentation 2013," it'll be fine?
I said Nintendo Directs were just positive reinforcement for Nintendo fanboys fucking ages ago. Sessler owes me money.
I call it the Geoff Keighley Effect.
No longer will Doritos call the shots, it's Bananas time to shine!!!
so they got some cheers at a show, do you think if they had announced that game on the show floor and showed the same video that info would not have gotten to consumers?
I said Nintendo Directs were just positive reinforcement for Nintendo fanboys fucking ages ago. Sessler owes me money.
If they weren't so concerned with their products being out in the open, why would they make it press only in the first place?
Are you pretending there's no difference in perception between a pre recorded video of Iwata standing in front of a blue screen pretending to be funny and having an actual conference in front of hundreds of people, in terms of what is more likely to get the attention of a mainstream audience?
Agree, cut the middle man Nintendo. Is not like the press gave a sh!t about the consumer anyways. ND are one of the best decisions from Nintendo in recent times.Nintendo announces new news to fans first, everybody else relies on press. What's the takeaway? If anything, the takeaway is that Nintendo cares about their fans first and foremost. I consider that a good thing. I liked learning about X and other games before the press reported on it. The press obviously doesn't like it, but who gives a shit? I sure as hell don't. And the press will still report on everything even remotely worthwhile, so I don't think Nintendo really cares, either.
Great, now you're both confirmed to be delusional![]()
No. I'm asking why people are pretending that if Nintendo airs an hour+ video during E3 time that serves the effective function of a conference and at the same time as a conference, then anybody who is not a Nintendo fan or owner will go "shit I can't watch this, it might be called 'a Nintendo Direct' and that's not for me."
That E3 gets way more exposure from gaming and non-gaming press and also reaching a non-gaming audience. ND is directed at fans who are already invested in Nintendo.
I don't care either way but not E3 presser alongside Sony and MS does hint that they are either worried, or super confident.
The press weren't the only ones watching. they had millions of pairs of eyes trained on that screen all at once through the live stream as well.
This post perfectly sums up the sort of semantics that Nintendo fans are willing to deploy to be able to justify anything Nintendo does. Are you all so resistant to the idea of criticizing your favorite company for what is a painfully obvious short sighted decision?You're asserting the *effect*, but not the *cause*.
You're asserting the *effect*, but not the *cause*.How is it hard to grasp the difference? E3 gets a shit load more viewers and coverage in the press, therefore by keeping their stuff for Nintendo Directs they're depleting potential coverage and mindshare.A question on this core theme of the complaint:
Nintendo directs are watched by Nintendo fans.
E3 Conferences are watched by everyone.
Crucial question, here: what is the key difference between the two broadcasts?
Because the method in which is airs may well be different. If it's only on Nintendo's website, for example, there's a good chance it'll get less advertising in advance. I don't see Gametrailers having a week long countdown clock for something they won't air.
Nobody knows whether or not a Nintendo broadcast would generate any difference in exposure than E3, since there's no E3 Nintendo Direct data to go on.
No. I'm asking why people are pretending that if Nintendo airs an hour+ video during E3 time that serves the effective function of a conference for gamers and at the same time as a conference, then anybody who is not a Nintendo fan or owner will go "shit I can't watch this, it might be called 'a Nintendo Direct' and that's not for me."
Hell, we still don't even know if it is a prerecorded video.
Um, I think this just shows that my views are in line with The Most Respect Man In Video Game Journalism In The Americas.
Journalists already getting salty. The plan is working![]()
It's kind of significant. People keep asserting that people will watch E3 conferences and not watch Nintendo Directs, and I've not heard a valid argument as to why, just people rephrasing the assertion. Let's revisit the original exchange, salient parts isolated out:
I ask why more people would watch an E3 Conference than an E3 Nintendo Direct. The reply I got states that E3 gets more viewers and coverage. The reply is stating *what* happens, not *why* it will happen, and I've not seen a reasonable argument yet as to *why* it is. The reply I got is tantamount to saying "Fewer people will watch it because fewer people will watch it".
You could argue it's semantics, but in turn I'd argue that "E3 Conference" versus "E3 Nintendo Direct" is *also* semantics.
E3 is just a massive event that can be used to market your products.
It's kind of significant. People keep asserting that people will watch E3 conferences and not watch Nintendo Directs, and I've not heard a valid argument as to why, just people rephrasing the assertion. Let's revisit the original exchange, salient parts isolated out:
I ask why more people would watch an E3 Conference than an E3 Nintendo Direct. The reply I got states that E3 gets more viewers and coverage. The reply is stating *what* happens, not *why* it will happen, and I've not seen a reasonable argument yet as to *why* it is. The reply I got is tantamount to saying "Fewer people will watch it because fewer people will watch it".
You could argue it's semantics, but in turn I'd argue that "E3 Conference" versus "E3 Nintendo Direct" is *also* semantics.
It might be different.
That's my point. 90% of this discussion is based on pure conjecture built from Iwata making vague statements at an investor briefing. From "we will have multiple events, for example these two for distributors and press impressions, more details will come about presentations for our audience," we have the assumption that, "there will be two events, and a 'Nintendo Direct' only on Nintendo's website."
There's no history of Nintendo Directs airing first anywhere other than Nintendo's website, right? Or Justin.tv or whatever it is they use.
Sure, it could be different, but the logical thing is to assume this will just be airing on their website.
Pretty much. Still, the one thing I've always liked about Directs is how, for the lack of a better word, dry they are. Not every consumer likes every game. The Directs know that. I never get the feeling Nintendo tries to sell me on everything - they show me what they have, and it's up to me to decide what's interesting and what isn't. It simply feels honest.I call it the Geoff Keighley Effect.
No longer will Doritos call the shots, it's Bananas time to shine!!!
It's kind of significant. People keep asserting that people will watch E3 conferences and not watch Nintendo Directs, and I've not heard a valid argument as to why, just people rephrasing the assertion. Let's revisit the original exchange, salient parts isolated out:
I ask why more people would watch an E3 Conference than an E3 Nintendo Direct. The reply I got states that E3 gets more viewers and coverage. The reply is stating *what* happens, not *why* it will happen, and I've not seen a reasonable argument yet as to *why* it is. The reply I got is tantamount to saying "Fewer people will watch it because fewer people will watch it".
You could argue it's semantics, but in turn I'd argue that "E3 Conference" versus "E3 Nintendo Direct" is *also* semantics.
Precedent kind of got thrown out the window last night, so it's hard to use that as a measuring stick.
"Will forthcoming Wii U controller breathe new life into aging Wii console" - CNN
yeah, always such good press for Nintendo
It is changing. It's getting smaller.100% agree with Sessler's perspective on this and Nintendo's bubble that doesn't seem to be changing.
Nintendo announces new news to fans first, everybody else relies on press. What's the takeaway? If anything, the takeaway is that Nintendo cares about their fans first and foremost. I consider that a good thing. I liked learning about X and other games before the press reported on it. The press obviously doesn't like it, but who gives a shit? I sure as hell don't. And the press will still report on everything even remotely worthwhile, so I don't think Nintendo really cares, either.
As long as they're referring to them as Directs, not really. How can it be a direct if it airs via a third party
They aren't skipping E3, what the hell Sess. They just aren't making huge announcements during a single huge presentation.
Pretty sure closed door press event at e3 will do just fine
Once again: they haven't said that it will be a Nintendo Direct.
They aren't skipping E3, what the hell Sess. They just aren't making huge announcements during a single huge presentation.
But they brought up Directs as a means of demonstrating how they can communicate directly to customers without the need for a conference.
I think it is you, EmCeeGramr, who is making the logic leap and I who is the one with the sound mind thinking rationally. We shall see when the truth is revealed and one of us is made to look like a fool.