Kagey K
Banned
Throw a brick hide, kill someone, throw another brick, hide, make it to the exit, Girls in love and one of them dies, throw more bricks.You can always watch a play through on Youtube.
Throw a brick hide, kill someone, throw another brick, hide, make it to the exit, Girls in love and one of them dies, throw more bricks.You can always watch a play through on Youtube.
Then they make out.Throw a brick hide, kill someone, throw another brick, hide, make it to the exit, Girls in love and one of them dies, throw more bricks.
Before or after she’s dead?Then they make out.
Before and after.Before or after she’s dead?
PDF OF THE STUDY
(MIRROR)
OneAngryGamer article about the study:
Daily Gaming News Of July 2021 • OneAngryGamer
Laters news from renewed One Angry Gamer team. Indie games, Mid-budget games, Development news, Dame engine news, Early Access entries and way morewww.oneangrygamer.netSexualized Female Game Characters Don't Cause Body Dissatisfaction, A…
archived 9 Jul 2019 02:07:56 UTCarchive.is
Important bits of the study:
(Highlighting added by me)
I saw brap already posted this story while I was almost finished with this but my OP’s better so fuck it.
Before and after.
Before and after.
Women are finicky when it comes to how the media portrays them.So playing with sexualized characters makes women feel less capable and more negative about other women's intelligence..? That all seems significant, and has some connection to "self-esteem" in the ordinary sense.. To see a highly sexualized woman is to feel reduced, degraded? Isn't that all kind of.. bad news?
1b actually shows negative impact guys.
Whitesnake Thanks a lot for your effort, but pretty please, don't use yellow to highlight, I can't read it.
1b actually shows negative impact guys.
Whitesnake Thanks a lot for your effort, but pretty please, don't use yellow to highlight, I can't read it.
I'll admit I'm not the smartest guy but is it because of the sexualized female character or a female character in general?Hypothesis 1b stated that playing the sexualized female character would result in lower self-efficacy in women. Support was found for this prediction.
Playing a game with sexualized characters in it, regardless if one plays them or not.I'll admit I'm not the smartest guy but is it because of the sexualized female character or a female character in general?
Throw a brick hide, kill someone, throw another brick, hide, make it to the exit, Girls in love and one of them dies, throw more bricks.
To be fair you forgot about moving ladders and cinematic masterpieces full of emotion.Well you saved everyone from a let’s play for part 1.
My bad I was trying to downplay the slow parts of the game.To be fair you forgot about moving ladders and cinematic masterpieces full of emotion.
Also I'd argue that excluding sexualized female characters increases male aggression.Results indicated little evidence to suggest that playing a video game with sexualized content influenced any of the outcome variables. […]
That's actually much worse than if playing a sexualised character gave you lower self-esteem. Because if it does, there is a simple solution: Do not play the game. But if playing the game gives you a bad opinion about women's mental capabilities, that is an indicator that people playing the game can negatively affect other people. So "if you don't like such games, don't play them" is not a sufficient advice.Specifically, participants who played the sexualized character (M = 2.93, SD = 1.17) reported less favorable attitudes toward women’s mental capabilities than did participants who did not play a video game (M = 2.52, SD = 1.01), F (2, 325) = 3.38, p = .04, W 2 = .02. There were no significant differences with the non-sexualized character (M = 2.72, SD = 1.13).
Holy mother of fuck, this whole image is Hilarious!
Yeah? Well, explain this incels!
lol you and your problems. Get a girl or a good hentai so you don't need to give a fuck if the girls in videogames are ugly or that there are gay people on the screen.
That's actually much worse than if playing a sexualised character gave you lower self-esteem. Because if it does, there is a simple solution: Do not play the game. But if playing the game gives you a bad opinion about women's mental capabilities, that is an indicator that people playing the game can negatively affect other people. So "if you don't like such games, don't play them" is not a sufficient advice.
How am I supposed to delete your opinion?This post is giving me a bad opinion about men's mental capabilities. Please do better by deleting it.
I got you on part 2Well you saved everyone from a let’s play for part 1.
I think the headline is super deceiving, because the big news imo is Hypothesis 5:
That's actually much worse than if playing a sexualised character gave you lower self-esteem. Because if it does, there is a simple solution: Do not play the game. But if playing the game gives you a bad opinion about women's mental capabilities, that is an indicator that people playing the game can negatively affect other people. So "if you don't like such games, don't play them" is not a sufficient advice.
The tile is misleading.Lets see if we can count on 1 finger how many of our beloved games "Journalists" will cover this....
Yeah but not 2B, so that's ok.1b actually shows negative impact guys.
Meanwhile on Instagram...Conservatives say violence in videogames causes school shootings, Studies prove them wrong.
Liberals say sexuality in videogames causes misogyny and sexual harrasment. Studies prove them wrong.
Different day, same old bullshit. Videogames I guess will always be a target.
@mods delete my thread or merge it or whatever. i dont care.
Holy mother of fuck, this whole image is Hilarious!
Conservatives say violence in videogames causes school shootings, Studies prove them wrong.
Spain is the best reference for this xDDD
The main "left" political group is full of female: kidnappers, murderers, delinquents, and of course, feminist activists. And for the male counterpart: rapists, sexists, and, of course too, feminist allies.
But it just natural: People become more invested in things that they feel the most, like... If you feel guilty about raping some innocent woman, you'll pursue "woman rights" until your facade drops, but until then, you will point to anyone that can make you feel a little better. Even if that is to let you continue it, or destroying the society.
(Just saying, other political groups aren't free of charge, it's just that they aren't the auto-proclamed saviors of women xD)
Careful throwing that name around, Dick Packer aka Abby will rush in here triggered at the mere notion of android butt cheeks.Yeah but not 2B, so that's ok.
I know Tipper Gore was involved in the push against videogames. As was Senator Joseph Lieberman, who was a democrat. But there were a lot of controversies regarding videogames started by right wing and conservative groups. Can we forget Fox News' stirring expose into the porn simulator that is Mass Effect?That's not how it ended.
Al Gore's wife was involved in major push to tackle "violence in games".
It ended up with the Supreme Court stating that's free speech so leave them alone.
Oh, don't get me wrong, my point was not that it wasn't conservatives who were against, just that it was decided by SC that it's a free speech issue, so everyone needs to let it be.I know Tipper Gore was involved in the push against videogames. As was Senator Joseph Lieberman, who was a democrat. But there were a lot of controversies regarding videogames started by right wing and conservative groups. Can we forget Fox News' stirring expose into the porn simulator that is Mass Effect?
And the uglyfication of female characters for feminist reasons (DA:I, ME:A, Horizon) causes me to boycott said games.
Aloy (and the pretty actress she is based off) is far from ugly and one of the prettiest realistically design female character, plus she wasn't uglyfied because Horizon was the first game she was in. Also in the Carja Blazon armor she is outright hot with her exposed midriff showing off her tight stomach with a subtle hint of abs.Your other 2 examples I would agree with.
And to think it cost thousands of dollars and several years of research to reach this conclusion.
Ppl talk about the game industry needing to self police itself but the science industry REALLY needs to start doing that better. Science has fast become one of the biggest shams ever. "Give me a million dollars and 10 years to research it and I'll conclude that if X happens during Y, then Z is hypothetically possible..... maybe."and it's probably not even accurate (or precise), whatever it is
all these studies are garbage, always have been