So what you're saying is you don't want hate speech laws because your courts are corrupt and cannot be trusted?
So your argument is that the US is too incompetent to enact laws that a lot of Western countries had for dozens of years.
The courts of France, Great-Britain and Canada aren't any more corrupt than the ones in the US, much less corrupt if you ask me. What I'm saying is that in those countries hate speech and hate crime laws have occasionally been used against minorities, instead of for them. I think the same will happen in the US. I mean, just look at the Blue Lives Matter legislation. You're naive if you think minorities won't be victim to those kinds of laws as often as they'd benefit from them.
IMO, the hundreds and sometimes thousands of people surrounding every white supremacist march to oppose them send out a much stronger message than any fine or prison sentence could ever do. By all means, ban every type of weapon from peaceful protests and put an end to open carry laws but I don't think to outlaw speech (unless it is a direct call to violence) is productive. However, I do believe white supremacist militias should be targeted by the authorities much in the same way Islamist terror cells are.