Stumpokapow
listen to the mad man
What does it say to you that they didn't?
Infrastructure and staff cost quite a bit of money
Google could since they know everything about you and sell your soul
The fundamental difference to consoles is that the reason many people choose Steam and continue to choose it is because it offers the best feature feature set on the platform, not because they simply have no other choice. And part of that feature set is being free.Steam would lose far more money from it than would be worth it for them. They wouldn't do it.
I think overall it would drop their revenue and profit pretty significantly. It would be the worst move they could make.That would send them into an Exodus away from Steam. Steam is just embedded into the PC gaming scene that it's hard to start up a new distribution platform. But if they did that, you can be sure people would flood into GOG instead. Steam is in a VERY comfortable position and I don't see them wanting to upset that.
Ok.PC is open,you can look the pc-manafactures stock price recent years.
They should all be free.
no because it makes money...
I prefer not free and quality vs free and garbage.
Sadly you just get paid garbage.I prefer not free and quality vs free and garbage.
Well thank god Steam is free and quality
Sadly you just get paid garbage.
Yep.
The time to reject it was when Sony went there. But people just bent over instead.
I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around what you're saying here. The statement just isn't good English. Is this saying that PC gamers are no better because we allowed digital only to happen on the platform essentially? Because PC games have never been able to be resold. Even physical disks had one time use CD keys. Like floppy disk days, sure I guess? The transition to digital has not only saved devs and publishers money and increased their profits, but also helped to reduce the cost to consumer often.
Digital is markedky more porfitable than physical.
They should all be free.
Also, have you ever payed for PSN or Xbox Live? Your fault, you don´t get to complain.
I wish Sony stuck to being free this gen it would be forced Microsofts hand.
I think if Sony was still free this gen MS would have backtracked it aswell, they would have gotten slaughtered if not. They wouldn't really have had a choice in the matter.If that was the case MS would have been completely outdone.
Honestly though the money they all bring in makes it cemented. The one who can afford to make it free again is MS but their xbox division likely needs it to be profitable compared to the rest of MS's divisions.
Either way peer to peer is cancer and paying for it doubly so. I was thinking perhaps there would be a way to get nintendo to backtrack but I'm not seeing it. It's way too much money on the table for them to give it up now that they started down this route.