drakesfortune said:That said, I think that $49.99 should be the price of 360 and PS3 games to start with. I think they'd both sell a lot more games if they were $49.99 at release. I think $50 is psychological barrier.
Dr. Zoidberg said:The biggest surprise in this thread to me is how many people are now happy with the $60 starting price for retail games. Hells bells, some of them talk about how this game or that is worth 80 or 90!
Games are too expensive. They can lower the price of hardware but every gen they bump the price of retail games up again is going to shrink the potential market for that console just as badly. The increase in popularity for handhelds and even the Wii may be partially attributable to the reasonable prices of games for those platforms.
wat??manzo said:Valkyria Chronicles made me feel like it's the golden years of jRPGs (1998?) again. This fact alone makes it one of the best games this generation.
I paid 43 euros for a new copy and I should've paid 69. I felt guilty for buying it from a discount.
Dude do you ever stop with you bullshit?Keikoku said:So many threads about this game... I'm playing this right now and I'm enjoying it, but this praise for it is getting annoying. It bombed, so what ? Lost Odyssey, TOV and many other good JRPGs knew the same fate this gen. Get over it fanboys.
Durante said:I think "don't give a fuck" is saying a bit much but I agree with the general argument. I think the demand for this type of game is not very elastic with price.
Anyone who's been playing this had been enjoying it. There's nothing to be over with. I think we've all faced it. The context of this thread created an ire in me which I couldn't sit on.Keikoku said:Can't you just play the game and enjoy it ? It's not the first good game to bomb, neither it's the last. Face it.
Maybe it's because both SEGA fanboys and sonyfans are angry about this.
That would've helped a little, no doubt.superbank said:They should have advertised it.
This is kinda the halfway point. I'm glad you think it is a justified full price game, even if you did buy it at a great price.gregor7777 said:It's a game I waited on until it hit $30. I wasn't going to buy a game that I was unsure about at $60. There's no reason for me to do so, if I have other games I haven't played yet. Might as well wait, I'll get to it eventually if I put it on my list.
Now, that being said, it turned out to be one of those games that would have been worth my $60. But that's the best part about waiting on some games. That's what you're hoping will happen.
That's how you explain Star Ocean bombing. There's one of many JRPG's that would've thrived more if it were on both platforms.Tobor said:Price and quality were not this games problem. The lack of a 360 port was the problem. 3rd party exclusives are a bad idea this gen, at least for US releases.
I might end up buying this game just to have it for when I eventually get a PS3, but I would have bought it day 1 had it been multiplat.
You're right. Fall is the wrong time to launch a more niche title like this. It needs a little breathing room or at least not be coupled with Gears2/R2 and the fall gauntlet of games.Hcoregamer00 said:The game bombed for a variety of reasons, price is not one of them.
-Niche Market
-Poor advertising
-VERY POOR release date placement (November 2008)
-New IP
Had Valkyria Chronicles been released in Summertime or Winter 2009, the game would have likely garnered more sales.
The $60 has nothing to do with it.
Tiktaalik said:I think a major problem was that over the last several years the SRPG fanbase has been essentially trained to be ok with simple, abstract graphics and as well cheaper SRPGs. At what point in the past were SRPG fans hyping themselves for the next gen and a mindblowing upgrade in graphical fidelity for their SRPGs? That has never happened. Of course it's possible that people could have really WOWed by the graphics and it could have changed the way SRPGs are made, but I don't think that was very likely to happen, and we've seen that that didn't happen.
Good luck with that. Sucks to be a 1 console owner. Do what's right and own at least 360 and PS3.Wheeliedude said:I will buy this if it is ported.
LiquidMetal14 said:Good luck with that. Sucks to be a 1 console owner. Do what's right and own at least 360 and PS3.
Tobor said:Who says he's a 1 console owner?
Johann said:Sega was probably trying to attract shooter fans with some of the gameplay mechanics.
I think in some ways, it was a case for going for the bird in bush with bird in hand and losing both. You have traditional SRPG fans (who probably have a PS2/DS and are used to more traditional gameplay in a fantasy setting) being alienated by the WWII influenced setting and emphasis on gunplay. You then have the shooter fans who might appreciate the shooting element but never give the game a chance due to the anime aesthetic.
Nevertheless, it was absolute suicide for Sega to release the game in November. I remember back when a bunch of different publishers all decided to release several RTS games, such as Dawn or War and Rome:Total War, and other major PC titles within a week of each other in the September of 2004. It's sometimes baffling how this can occur in the industry.
GitarooMan said:Game wasn't going to sell big no matter the price, it's a niche anime-style strategy RPG with no recognizable branding. Having said that, I just bought it for $30 (but that's only because I've been poor lately, in my past life I would have bought it right away).
This is the kind of game that has a distinct audience in the US that is in no way more than low 6 figure (~100-300k). I'm sure Sega knew that.
Grimm Fandango said:Played a couple chapters my new copy today.
It's pretty fun but the atmosphere is kinda wonky. Like JRPG meets WWII. I'm half expecting a "summon the ancient god" storyline to pop up. That and Alicia's character design... just no.
Hcoregamer00 said:What? You mean you don't like her peasant outfit?
staringintomysoul.jpg
LiquidMetal14 said:I don't think anyone's angry except those of us who wonder why a thread like this would center around Valkyria (one of the best, if not, the best current gen JRPG's).
what the fuck happened to her eyes?Hcoregamer00 said:What? You mean you don't like her peasant outfit?
![]()
Haunted said:what the fuck happened to her eyes?
Wheeliedude said:I will buy this if it is ported.
KongRudi said:The reason I think it won't come to 360 is because I suspect it would require too many disks, and thus get to expensive to publish.
And isn't there also a rule about a game must take advantage of 'Xbox Live's multiplayer-features' on 360, so that MS can get their hard earned money, or it will have to take a financial penalty?
So let's cross our fingers for a PC-port.
BocoDragon said:It's kinda rarish here... I'm sure I could eBay a copy but everyone is marking it up to like $50 and I know they must have bought it for $30.
Someone mentioned a second print run... is that in the original packing? I dislike greatest hits. If its returning to stores soon at $30 I'll just wait... but if not I'll hunt this mofo down at whatever price. Just replayed the demo and it's so good. I love the setting, artstyle and Sakimoto soundtrack! Cool that it's from Sega too. Just what I want on PS3... it's all about the jRPGs!!
Sorry I would have bought it for $60 but the last year has been a financial ruin for me! I also haven't been able to buy RE5...
Fixed... quite literally.Haunted said:what the fuck happened to her breasts?
KongRudi said:
Keikoku said:Valkyria ? Requires too many discs ? Really ? Did you really played this game ? I mean, 90% of the cutscenes are just characters talking in a portrait or some in-engine cutscenes... nothing different than TOV or ES.
The reason it won't be ported is because Sony owns the right for the anime I think.