Krusenstern
Banned
The Elder Scrolls : The Dumbing Down
For anyone who is interested.
For anyone who is interested.
Why?
Has anyone played Doom recently?
It's not as though I played 20 hours and said "Well, Skyrim is crap." I played through 3-4 characters and over 100 hours before the boredom of needing to craft to optimize melee and armor, or needing to enchant to optimize magic, or BOTH if you really want to perfect your character, and by that point the charm of the combat had worn off as well.
I love Skyrim but come on... It's not even the best Elder Scrolls.
The combat is broken.
The story is awful.
They go for quantity over quality when it comes to questing. There are some interesting quest lines but nothing close to ones in Oblivion or Morrowind. BORING.
On the topic of quests. There's an illegal amount of side quests. Fetch quests. Alduiwho? Let me help this random peasant get drunk.
Dragons are a joke. Just sit there and watch townies kill them.
If they had to pick a TES game it should have been Morrowind.
Deus Ex
Diablo 2
Starcraft
Half Life 2
Bioshock
Total War series
Ultima 7
Minecraft
Civ 5
I'd pick any of these over Skyrim.
Shacks and caves with people in them, yes. They lived there. I took those places, used their gear and stored my items there. Have never lost anything.Those are just shacks that might have people in them. They most likely don't offer safe storage, which means at a certain point, everything you've stored in there will disappear and be replaced by things like bread and a leather helmet or whatever.
What did you hunt? What's even the point of hunting? It doesn't offer any notable experience, materials, or profit. Archery is fun, though you can't run backwards nearly as fast as Oblivion, so it can't usually be your primary mode of combat.
The dual-wielding boils down to nothing but spamming power attacks. You can't block, so you have to just stagger enemies. You can't power attack for very long, so you'll get stuck in the same cycle as every melee character, looking for ways to enhance your stamina. There's no nuance. There's no way to aim your attacks in any meaningful way, no skill-based parrying, your attacks don't feel very powerful (swinging a greataxe is always disappointing).
It's not as though I played 20 hours and said "Well, Skyrim is crap." I played through 3-4 characters and over 100 hours before the boredom of needing to craft to optimize melee and armor, or needing to enchant to optimize magic, or BOTH if you really want to perfect your character, and by that point the charm of the combat had worn off as well.
I wouldn't trust a place that choose MGS 4 as the 2008 GOTY twice.
The Elder Scrolls : The Dumbing Down
For anyone who is interested.
Games with console UI should be disqualified from top 10. Just saying.
These top lists are good for one reason though. Gives you a good barameter if you give a shit about opinions from an outlet.
Erm, if you play any game over 100 hours it usually means it's a pretty darn good game. You spend dozens of hours on a game you hate.
Are you the infamous Full Action Center?
Could have been worse. They could have chosen a Valve game.
It's hard to take you seriously.FACE is a pretty stupid name, isn't it?
wat
what shit is this
If anything, Skyrim content is spoonfed for you than anything else, and has so much cinematic "effects" than you average JRPG.
Erm what, that's what exactly the outrage is about - because Skyrim is considered best despite all of the crap it has. Read again what you said.
I liked Skyrim, but it isn't close to the best game on PC. It isn't even the best game in its own series.
Maybe mods added a bajillion points but then I would still rank Morrowind over it.
I know what I said. Skyrim has flaws sure, every game does, but Skyrim's hate is a result of it's critical and commercial success. Now am I saying you aren't allowed to dislike Skyrim? Of course not, but the amount of vitriol it receives is ridiculous compared to much much worse games out there that never even get brought up. If I dislike a game I don't go into every thread it's mentioned and just continually say how bad it is and cite which games are infinity better. But when people see something they don't like continually receive praise they feel compelled to attack it as much as they can so they can bring it down a little. When people see the metacritic of Fallout 3 compared to the lower score of New Vegas, well that angers them, and to relinquish that anger they feel compelled to shout from the heavens at how awful Fallout 3 is compared to the masterpiece that is New Vegas. There are example like this all the time and it becomes tiresome really quickly.
Shacks and caves with people in them, yes. They lived there. I took those places, used their gear and stored my items there. Have never lost anything.
Why did I hunt? Because it was fun, because I like to explore uncharted areas of my map, and I'd sell skins and materials, or craft potions and gear.
Archery and stealth *is* my primary form of combat. Bows for various occasions, poisons and backstabs. Running backwards has nothing to do with it.
And we're talking PC here, so mod support does matter and there are mods for just about anything you can imagine. For all I know there are hit location mods, as there are several different combat overhauls out there.
But hey, we got different things out of the game - that's fine. We probably wanted different things out of the game and I came out with something closer to my styles of play.
Erm, if you play any game over 100 hours it usually means it's a pretty darn good game. You spend dozens of hours on a game you hate.
It's hard to take you seriously.
Because from a mechanical standpoint it's much better playing.
I stopped paying attention to PC Game when they posted an article saying DayZ and WarZ gave birth to the survival genre.
But I really believe its nostalgia. Games are better than they were. If Doom came out as an Indie game, people wouldn't look twice and it simply wouldn't sell. Doom was ahead of its time when it came out, and a huge leap for FPS games. But it just isn't, when compared to the heavy hitters, as good from a technical and design standpoint.I did, actually! A couple of years ago, I think.
I had a blast.
I agree with the concept of putting Skyrim the top. I don't have a list of my top PC games, but I agree that Skyrim is a good choice at 1. I'm sure all their editors didn't put Skyrim at 1 but agree with that its a top PC game.So while you may not agree with them you agree with them.
Fantastic.
Ultimately every game is pointless if the act of playing it isn't rewarding for you. And that rewarding feeling doesn't have to come from points or achievements or townspeople screaming your name or the game world fundamentally changing.No. Mods don't excuse poor combat. They really, really don't. I don't see how that makes any sense.
The thing about Skyrim is that you eventually realize everything is pointless. The game only offers challenge when it's in the form of bullet sponges, and defeating a bunch of bandits relies upon running away to recover your stamina and power-attacking them to death so they never get a chance to fight back (or upgrading recovery spells to also restore stamina). There's no nuance or satisfaction. It has a lot to do that you can do at your own pace. But there ultimately isn't a compelling reason to do it other than "because you can."
What am I even reading?
The thing about Skyrim is that you eventually realize everything is pointless.
I, uh, Skyrim? Of all the freakin' time?
How did someone say it...
The game is like an ocean, but just ankle deep?
The Elder Scrolls : The Dumbing Down
For anyone who is interested.
Has anyone played Doom recently? Doom was great for what it was, but it isn't close to what anyone would call a good shooter anymore.
Watched a few minutes and god damn thats a real elitist PC gamer wankfest.
I turned off at him saying KB+M = only choice for serious gamers