Devolution
Member
I knew a Mormon chick in college who was an anal fiend. We got along pretty well despite our religious differences.
Her hymen was intact the sex didn't count!
I knew a Mormon chick in college who was an anal fiend. We got along pretty well despite our religious differences.
It's rather genius.Her hymen was intact the sex didn't count!
Good for you?Being intelligent is important to me.
It's also entirely possible to not be an idiot while holding onto an idiotic concept.I don't understand why people date idiots. Because anyone who believes the earth is 6000 years old is an idiot. Religion is no excuse for willful ignorance. It's entirely possible to be religious and not be an idiot, but the girl in the OP is clearly not one of those people.
Can you print out a certificate for me? I need something to remind me.Good for you?
You officially are not required to believe in a 6,000 year old Earth.
You were inferring judgment with that statement with out saying it outright. Come on you know what I meant. We're not children here.
What is slightly humorous to me is I would bet you could find the exact opposite of this thread on some religious forum.
"oh my, JAF (Jesus age forum) my boyfriend doesn't accept Jesus as his personal savior! What should I do?"
"dump him"
"try and educate him, read him the bible"
"I could never be with someone who doesn't believe in Jesus"
Listen guys, meet a girl from Charleston and tell me you still wouldn't date a religious person. I met one last semester and she's a stunning blonde with light green eyes, with the warmest smile and laid back personality you will ever meet.
She happened to be religious but if I lived in Charleston I would easily date her and happily never talk about religion nor politics. What kind of shitty guy talks politics with his girl anyway? If you are, perhaps your in a boring relationship (not directed at you OP).
The notion that you will completely ignore someone with a different outlook on life is obscene, especially to the level some posters in here are bringing it, by comparing an individuals beliefs to a child's intelligence. It's ridiculous.
Let it be known that I'm not even religious, and consider it silly as well. However, to me, it's a boring topic to talk about, and often leads to petty arguments over who is right and wrong. I avoid those conversations altogether, especially with a girl I am interested in.
So to you OP, don't engage in political or religious conversations with your girlfriend. She hates talking about it, you hate talking about, and most importantly, you both hate talking about it together.
You may even enjoy talking politics with colleagues and friends, but I can safely assume you hate talking about it with your girl. Just live it up, have fun and share a laugh. That's all I ever did with past girlfriends, and currently searching for in a relationship.
I guess what I am trying to say is political and religious views are NOT the right characteristics to judge a persons personality. Get on with it OP, a year and a half is a long time and it seems like you really dig her or else you would have left her a lonnnngggg time ago.
Sorry about that. I'm used to sarcastic ass Americans.Actually "We don't know what you meant", i am from another culture so don't always assume what i mean. I was saying it in a free spirited way, surely that's not a hard concept to grasp.
These are nice posts, but they both seem to miss the point that this thread started off about a very specific and stupid belief. It's not really about Jesus or even just religion.
With that said, these topics usually devolve into people thumping their chests about the infallibility of science, when they themselves lack critical thinking skills.
When it comes to aging, most take studies at face value, and many evolutionists don't even realize that Carbon dating assumptions are not reliable past even 5,000 years.
Other techniques for radiometric dating rely heavily on circular reasoning, using reference fossils. When dates don't comply with the reference fossils, it is either thrown out as contaminated, or the previous "reliable" date has to be thrown out. I'm not arguing for a particular age of the Earth, but it wouldn't hurt if people go at it with a cynical viewpoint.
Sorry to say, but this is one field of science that relies heavily on assumptions, biased interpretations, and sensationalist discoveries to secure more funding dollars.
Thankfully for us, people choosing whether or not to accept a scientific theory, has no bearing on the validity of the theory itself.
By the way, scientists don't use carbon dating for the age of the earth, they use argon and potassium dating for the age of the earth.
Thankfully for us, people choosing whether or not to accept a scientific theory, has no bearing on the validity of the theory itself.
By the way, scientists don't use carbon dating for the age of the earth, they use argon and potassium dating for the age of the earth.
Sanky hasn't responded in awhile, so hopefully he is gathering up his sources. I really hope it wasn't a simple hit and run.
Thank you sir. You summed up my feelings in one sentence. Well put.Thankfully for us, people choosing whether or not to accept a scientific theory, has no bearing on the validity of the theory itself.
It only matters if it matters to you.
Sanky hasn't responded in awhile, so hopefully he is gathering up his sources. I really hope it wasn't a simple hit and run.
-Snip-
It likely matters to our entire species. Our entire continued existence kind of hinges on making more good decisions than bad decisions. The more informed the world is, the more good decisions we have the potential of making.
And yet the world has continued to survive fine without the age of the Earth tattooed in their brain. It is not a requirement of life to know the age of it. As I said before, this is exactly as important as someone who says they don't care how old the Earth is.It likely matters to our entire species. Our entire continued existence kind of hinges on making more good decisions than bad decisions. The more informed the world is, the more good decisions we have the potential of making.
If the topic was "So my girlfriend thinks the moon is made out of cheese...", would this girlfriend be exempt from criticism as well?
Glad my girlfriend is an atheist. Only problem is the only drugs she lets me take is weed/alcohol... meh all relationships have there downfalls.
i'm extremely happy though.
These are nice posts, but they both seem to miss the point that this thread started off about a very specific and stupid belief. It's not really about Jesus or even just religion.
It's a stupid belief. Does it really matter though?
I mean some of you guys sound like you would only date vulcans.
Or they wouldn't stoop to dating a fucking idiot just for the sex or her looks, god forbid.
It's a stupid belief. Does it really matter though?
I mean some of you guys sound like you would only date vulcans.
It's a stupid belief. Does it really matter though?
I mean some of you guys sound like you would only date vulcans.
99% of this forum are bluffing when they say they would dump the girl
Who would have thought that some people value common beliefs and interests?
Don't assume that GAF doesn't have any principles just because you don't.
It's a stupid belief. Does it really matter though?
I mean some of you guys sound like you would only date vulcans.
Or they wouldn't stoop to dating a fucking idiot just for the sex or her looks, god forbid.
I mean some of you guys sound like you would only date vulcans.
And yet the world has continued to survive fine without the age of the Earth tattooed in their brain. It is not a requirement of life to know the age of it. As I said before, this is exactly as important as someone who says they don't care how old the Earth is.
Anyway, there are plenty of people (Including religious folk) that accept what science teaches regarding the age of the Earth & universe.
This thread is turning into another silly argument about the fake dangers of religious beliefs. Seriously, what do you think this girl will do with her lack of knowledge?
When his girlfriend writes a science textbook, I'll be a little more worried.
I don't think OP's personal plight has any impact on mankind's continued existence, hahaha.
Honestly, it is more beautiful and poetic to believe that we are all destined for the afterlife and that we are all under the eye of a God, who will ensure our immortal and everlasting happiness when we die.
No reason to be sad for her missing out on the depressing reality that we all just end.
To the OP: I apologize if I sound really harsh or blunt here, but are you sure you "love her dearly"? Because truthfully... I don't think you think yourself as an equal to her. I think deep down, you honestly think of her as a person that is lesser than you. I do not think this can be a basis of a healthy relationship for two adults.
.
The notion that you will completely ignore someone with a different outlook on life is obscene, especially to the level some posters in here are bringing it, by comparing an individuals beliefs to a child's intelligence. It's ridiculous.
Let it be known that I'm not even religious, and consider it silly as well. However, to me, it's a boring topic to talk about, and often leads to petty arguments over who is right and wrong. I avoid those conversations altogether, especially with a girl I am interested in.
I guess what I am trying to say is political and religious views are NOT the right characteristics to judge a persons personality. Get on with it OP, a year and a half is a long time and it seems like you really dig her or else you would have left her a lonnnngggg time ago.
Or they wouldn't stoop to dating a fucking idiot just for the sex or her looks, god forbid.
What? Are you saying religious women are fucking idiots?
What? Are you saying religious women are fucking idiots?
If tomorrow a scientific study was published that proclaimed irrefutable proof that carbon dating was in error by a factor of two, and that the Earth and the universe were really twice as old as we think now, I'd believe it. If the scientific community were all in agreement, I'd believe it, no matter how much I believe in things now.
Many posters in here are judging her intelligence based on her religious beliefs, when in fact she may write beautifully or solve calculus problems faster than they can.
Sorry duder, but no that's not my source.
I'll be back to respond in a bit, have to finish studying about the infallible science of finance.
I'll just pre-face by asking any of you if you truly understand the ASSUMPTIONS that are used to apply all these different dating methods.
Don't you think thats a problem. You believe one group of people even if they were to say hey we were wrong , its really this . But she believes another group of people and thats a problem ?
The truth is we are never going to know how old the earth is we are never going to know what really happened before us . There are allways new pieces to be found , there are allways corrections to past data .
(please note , i really don't beleive the earth is only 6,000 years old . However I'm open minded to science as much as religion because i wasn't alive 6,001 years ago to know if the earth was here)
Remember what the thread is about.
Is it about a religious woman or is it something more specific?
Sorry duder, but no that's not my source.
I'll be back to respond in a bit, have to finish studying about the infallible science of finance.
I'll just pre-face by asking any of you if you truly understand the ASSUMPTIONS that are used to apply all these different dating methods.
Yeah, it's actually not a very complicated reasoning. That's pretty straightforward. There's no subtext there.No, he's saying people who believe the earth is 6,000 years old are idiots.
Don't you think thats a problem. You believe one group of people even if they were to say hey we were wrong , its really this . But she believes another group of people and thats a problem ?
The truth is we are never going to know how old the earth is we are never going to know what really happened before us . There are allways new pieces to be found , there are allways corrections to past data .
(please note , i really don't beleive the earth is only 6,000 years old . However I'm open minded to science as much as religion because i wasn't alive 6,001 years ago to know if the earth was here)
If someone believes something that's absolutely fucking stupid is true, then yes. It matters.
I wouldn't date a girl with the mind of a small child, so something as ridiculous as this bothers me.
Like I said, my friend has two masters degrees. Fantastic at Math, works in a laboratory doing scientific (lol, his scientific research actually has strengthened his belief in God according to him) shit and is smarter than me. Yet he believes the Earth is 6000 years old.
Doesn't automatically make him unintelligent. Arguably I could say he's traditional and naive as shit. But I can't say he lacks intellect because of a matter of personal faith.
So I can't really agree with you there. And I mean we ARGUED about it...full on yelling and all that. Because at the time it blew my fucking mind. Because while I'm not an atheist I know full well the Earth is at least a few billion years old (personally I think it's MUCH older). Do I agree with his view? No. Not at all. But that doesn't make him a full on moron or unintelligent by default.
Seriously do people even read thread titles anymore? God damn.