Teach them critical thinking.![]()
You should point out that Jesus isn't the one that says it though.
That's not what I mean - I mean if they let the child grow up and figure out what it believes for itself. The age of the Earth is hardly something that important growing up.
If both parents nurtured a healthy scientific interest, it should be fine. It's kind of like believing in Santa, really. Kids just grow out of it. And children could learn things from both sides. If she'd force the child to go to church, though... then we have a problem.
Teach them critical thinking.![]()
That's not what I mean - I mean if they let the child grow up and figure out what it believes for itself. The age of the Earth is hardly something that important growing up.
1. Women can wear jewelry.
2. We can eat bacon.
3. Alcohol is better to be avoided and only a sin when a person gets drunk.
4. Christians are better off not dating unbelievers because bad company corrupts Godly morals.
I'm saying, let's say you meet an AMAZING person. Wonderful, intelligent, capable, loving, everything you could want....BUT she believed the Earth was 6000 years old.
Gaf my fiancée thinks Ghostbusters is a terrible movie, is this as bad as believing the Earth is 6000 years old, or worse?
Is that generally something parents do? Why would a caring religious parent allow even the smallest chance of condemning their kids to hell? In my experience, religious people suck at compromise. Why would they compromise when they're right?
A sure fire (Internet-approved) plan.Sounds like a relationship that's built to last. You should berate her until she agrees with you, OP. It's the only way to deal with people who don't believe the same things you do.
Gaf my fiancée thinks Ghostbusters is a terrible movie, is this as bad as believing the Earth is 6000 years old, or worse?
So does my mother and my older sister.
Gotta take the good with the bad my dude. I don't love them any less.
In life, not everyone will believe what you believe.
I think people saying "Dump her" are confusing a beliefe that the Earth is 6000 years old with being a horrible person.
I'm saying, let's say you meet an AMAZING person. Wonderful, intelligent, capable, loving, everything you could want....BUT she believed the Earth was 6000 years old.
Now some people are saying to throw away ALL that because of a single belief?
That doesn't make sense. I mean, neither does her belief in the Earth's age....but c'mon...
I think you're generalizing about this. Do you know the OPs girlfriend? How do you know she doesn't love him enough to compromise?
Of course, the issue is however, that some people push this reasoning to reach a false equivalency. It's one thing to have faith that the sun will rise tomorrow, it's another to have baseless faith that some being created that sun.Track record of...? Basic facts? How many people have tested them either? Done the math?
We accept certain facts as true all the time (as history has shown), and then something comes up and previous knowledge is overturned. Hence we also know from the track record that certain established facts can turn out to be wrong. Yet we still believe.
That is, until the group of people say "we were wrong," and then we believe the new thing. In the end, every belief we have is based on some degree of faith.
Gaf my fiancée thinks Ghostbusters is a terrible movie, is this as bad as believing the Earth is 6000 years old, or worse?
The best answer is to not argue about it, but please do try having a different belief imposed on you. As belief can dictate action, there's a very high chance that it will happen, and with an increased frequency. There are exceptions to that "rule," but take it as you will.
And sports at least bring money to a town. And it's also tangible. And I don't even follow them.
Dammit. Okay, never mind, you're right. This is true.
I did not take the whole religious aspect as seriously as I should have in my mind. Then again, she is still fucking OP, so...
Both sides sound like blind followers to me. Science changes all the time most things are theories. Keep you're mind open to possibilities. ( Not in this particular situation, but in general ) With a lot of experiences I have had in regard to health and nutrition I have found I had to dig hard and deep to find truths that go against what is so called "public" or accurate knowledge.
She is fine with it. She knows what the majority believe and is content to allow all of us "science believers" to go on deluded, lol. She does seem to enjoy trying to convince me, even though she knows full well that she can't. It's become a running joke of sorts between us, kind of playful actually.
Because she believes that God created the world 6000 years ago. She believes that God created the world 6000 years ago because she spent most of her formative years in an isolated environment that only espoused this viewpoint. She responds negatively to outside secular forces that challenge that worldview, treating them with suspicion and derision.
I wouldn't gather from this collection of information that the 6000 year old earth isn't the only thing she's holding on to from her schooling and she probably thinks her upbringing was normal and she's a good person and her kids will go to hell if they aren't Christian. This all suggests that she might get a little bit ornery about the subject of sacrificing her kids' souls and values to a secular society that feeds them misinformation and leads them away from the path of God.
More information would be nice but nothing given suggests that a 'compromise' is in the cards and even if both parties can agree top such a thing all I see down the road is festering resentment and dissatisfaction poisoning the relationship.
Both sides sound like blind followers to me. Science changes all the time most things are theories. Keep you're mind open to possibilities. ( Not in this particular situation, but in general ) With a lot of experiences I have had in regard to health and nutrition I have found I had to dig hard and deep to find truths that go against what is so called "public" or accurate knowledge.
No because your fiance just has a WRONG OPINION. OP's girlfriend is close minded and ignorant.
Quality of source is irrelevant now, believe whatever you want, there is no reason to think one thing over another! YAY!!!I find more in common with the militant atheist calling everyone stupid because they believe something blindly, as the street preaching evangalist telling everyone they're going to hell because they don't believe what they believe. Both are in the same retarded boat, that they're ego can't handle someone else not thinking the same way they do, and want to lash out for it.
I find so much irony in both sides, and just plain intolerance. One side telling the other "how can you be so blind" based on nothing more than what they grew up to believe. Sure, evolution is the scienfically proven answer off the backs of years of research and anthropological work, but most of hte people who tout that did nothing more than take it at face value either, believing what they were told growing up from a book and going no further. Wonder how many of these hardline intolerants spent in a museum seeing some of this work they oh so vigorously yell at and shout off about versus the time they spend arguing about it.
Yeah, congrats, they backed the right horse, but most did it at the same face value that anyone else in other camp did growing up. Reading what you were told to believe, and not going any further.
Of course, the issue is however, that some people push this reasoning to reach a false equivalency. It's one thing to have faith that the sun will rise tomorrow, it's another to have baseless faith that some being created that sun.
Using that false equivalency to bring validity to asinine ideologies is extremely frustrating.
No because your fiance just has a WRONG OPINION. OP's girlfriend is close minded and ignorant.
Nope.Both sides sound like blind followers to me.
Isn't it awesome?Science changes all the time
Like the germ theory of disease?most things are theories.
Science encourages a person to do that.Keep you're mind open to possibilities. ( Not in this particular situation, but in general )
Sounds interesting. Details?With a lot of experiences I have had in regard to health and nutrition I have found I had to dig hard and deep to find truths that go against what is so called "public" or accurate knowledge.
Exactly. My fiancée doesn't appreciate the subtlety of Bill Murray's humor. OPs girlfriend rejects science and every scientific advancement that has led us to an understanding of the earth's age.
My fiancée is a almost as wrong.
Haha.Both sides sound like blind followers to me. Science changes all the time most things are theories. Keep you're mind open to possibilities. ( Not in this particular situation, but in general ) With a lot of experiences I have had in regard to health and nutrition I have found I had to dig hard and deep to find truths that go against what is so called "public" or accurate knowledge.
really? Really? If what I'll call the path of science is filled with blind followers, who are the people who change the theories? A blind follower does not challenge the status quo. Who, then, is?
Both sides sound like blind followers to me. Science changes all the time most things are theories.
Great advice.
I do know what the scientific method is. I'm talking about on a personal basis. For example, I've read about wave-particle duality. I know what it is at a (really) basic level.
How do I know it actually occurs, when I've never done/observed experiments for myself? If you think about it, most information is just believing what a large enough group of people tell us. It's trust-based.
Unless you guys have done experiments on everything you currently believe...?
Quality of source is irrelevant now, believe whatever you want, there is no reason to think one thing over another! YAY!!!
OP is an example of the wrong opinion
so you're saying i have faith in science much like i have faith in the existence of norway?
Give me the nice person who believes the earth is 200 years old and can have fun and live carefree over the dogged annoying keyboard warrior who thinks he's changing the world by yelling at the seat of his computer because other people don't think what he thinks. Grow up OP.
Basically you can't prove anything beyond the fact that you exist. Nothing. That is what I was getting at the whole time. Literally, everything is faith. Religion is faith beyond faith.
Basically you can't prove anything beyond the fact that you exist. Nothing. That is what I was getting at the whole time. Literally, everything is faith. Religion is faith beyond faith.
Basically you can't prove anything beyond the fact that you exist. Nothing. That is what I was getting at the whole time. Literally, everything is faith. Religion is faith beyond faith.
Yes, I am a philosophy major
This logic makes sense only if you believe every one of your senses is a lie.