Fortinbras
Member
...Shig said:Dammit. Now I'll never finish out my achievements.
It was a fun concept.
...Shig said:Dammit. Now I'll never finish out my achievements.
No one really knows at this point. Such a weird decision.Pandoracell said:Sorry, what's this? Did a quick search. Why are they removing it?
chubigans said:No one really knows at this point. Such a weird decision.
radjago said:1. There weren't enough people playing the game.
3. The game only attracted core gamers instead of the expanded audience they were looking to lure onto Live.
I don't see how the IP would have any influence on the decision given the fact that the show was canceled two years ago. The IP had very little brand power here in the states (I think it still airs in Europe though).venne said:Could just be a casualty of a licensing issue. It's not like Microsoft owned the 1 vs. 100 IP.
I thought they bought the IP after the TV show was canceledvenne said:Could just be a casualty of a licensing issue. It's not like Microsoft owned the 1 vs. 100 IP.
chubigans said:I don't see how the IP would have any influence on the decision given the fact that the show was canceled two years ago.
But...that's what I said! Isn't it? The Saget show was off the air years ago.Stumpokapow said:No, it wasn't, and before you reply saying it was, consider that I know that 1 vs 100, hosted by Bob Saget, is no longer on the air.
Kenak said:Microsoft had such a great start this generation, but for some reason they are dead set on fucking themselves over before the finish line.
i thought it was partly live sub fee supported. :/ oh well, enjoy the extra money ms execs and shareholders!JonathanEx said:To be fair, as an ad-supported game it failed miserably because (at least in the UK), the only sponsors of series 2 were Bing and the Xbox Newsletter.
I also liked when they played the lobotomy Xbox adverts, they really helped convince me to buy the console I already own.
Possibly. But it mainly wasn't for Silver members because MS didn't want them near the dinner table. KEEP BEGGING FOR SCRAPS, KEEP BEGGING!AstroLad said:i thought it was partly live sub fee supported. :/ oh well, enjoy the extra money ms execs and shareholders!
chubigans said:But...that's what I said! Isn't it? The Saget show was off the air years ago.
That's not what I meant. What I meant was I doubt the IP holder would do much to discourage another season of 1vs100 given that the brand has less value than it did when it was on the air. Heck, the show was already off the air when MS started this version.Stumpokapow said:What does the Saget show have to do with anything? You said 1vs100 was off the air so there couldn't be any license issues.
chubigans said:That's not what I meant. What I meant was I doubt the IP holder would do much to discourage another season of 1vs100 given that the brand has less value than it did when it was on the air. Heck, the show was already off the air when MS started this version.
Well, there not making new ones here in the US. That's what I mean.Stumpokapow said:The show isn't off the air, I don't know why you keep saying that.
chubigans said:Well, there not making new ones here in the US. That's what I mean.![]()
Well I knew it was international but I thought the IPs work in a country by country basis.Stumpokapow said:Yes, I know that's what you mean--I knew that from the beginning. I was just hoping you didn't realize it was international as opposed to realizing it was international and not caring. The IP owner (Endemol, who also own Deal or No Deal, Wipeout, Big Brother, Fear Factor, Kid Nation, Wheel of Fortune, etc) isn't American, the show still airs in many countries, and the Microsoft version wasn't US-only either. If there are license issues, the Bob Saget show doesn't have anything to do with them![]()
LiK said:MS: Let's get rid of something fun.
ultron87 said:Replace it with a weekly You Don't Know Jack game and I won't miss it a bit.
pleasebeawesome pleasebeawesome pleasebeawesome pleasebeawesomeFladam said: