He's got a 3 year old thread from Destructoid. A whole lotta people just got served in here.
You want to read 50,000 more? Do a Google search.
He's got a 3 year old thread from Destructoid. A whole lotta people just got served in here.
It just came out, and it's at #29 right now. That's not good. Games that sold well are in the top 5 for weeks.
Why I think the game is performing poorly? I think the kart racing genre just isn't a large one on PC or the HD consoles, Blur performed poorly as well (on all platforms) and it even had a solid marketing push behind it and was developed at one of the top racing game studios in the world. Really the only franchise we see with remarkable performance in the genre is from Nintendo. Little Big Planet Karting appears to have been a failure, and I don't think Modnation Racers set the sales charts ablaze either.
Well, I sure am glad I'm talking to an expert on the subject.
So, you agree with me. Kart racing games aren't games that people spend $30+ on. That's what I said. This is a $10-$15 game being sold at twice what it's worth for people. These are quick fix arcade style games that people just want to play for a little while and drop. That's my whole point.
So, you agree with me. Kart racing games aren't games that people spend $30+ on. That's what I said. This is a $10-$15 game being sold at twice what it's worth for people. These are quick fix arcade style games that people just want to play for a little while and drop. That's my whole point.
Yeah okay now you're just making yourself out to be a blithering idiot.
He's got a 3 year old thread from Destructoid. A whole lotta people just got served in here.
Well, I sure am glad I'm talking to an expert on the subject.
If the PC version is anything like the Vita version which it probably is (and likely much better framerate!) then this game is absolutely worth whatever they are asking for. I heard $40 in US? That's a bargain. The game is designed extremely well and there is a tonne packed in. They have been really generous and it's led to a game with a lot of replayability.
My only complaints are framerate on Vita, and weapons could have been cooler.
If the PC version is anything like the Vita version which it probably is (and likely much better framerate!) then this game is absolutely worth whatever they are asking for. I heard $40 in US? That's a bargain. The game is designed extremely well and there is a tonne packed in. They have been really generous and it's led to a game with a lot of replayability.
My only complaints are framerate on Vita, and weapons could have been cooler.
If the PC version is anything like the Vita version which it probably is (and likely much better framerate!) then this game is absolutely worth whatever they are asking for. I heard $40 in US? That's a bargain. The game is designed extremely well and there is a tonne packed in. They have been really generous and it's led to a game with a lot of replayability.
My only complaints are framerate on Vita, and weapons could have been cooler.
I feel so owned. Likewise, Nintendo is raking in billions and all my Wii U perceptions are also wrong.
If only I knew as much as you obviously do.
Yeah, Destructoid is the only place that shits on Sega.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=501616
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=44805977&postcount=4
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=44805991&postcount=5
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=44806355&postcount=28
Ow. That must sting!
From over here it looks like you are looking for a reason to hate this game, or at least hate the developer. You're scraping together whatever evidence you can find, even if it's obscure or years old.
You aren't making a very sound argument, no matter what you're trying to actually do. You basically waltzed right in to the lion's den covered in lamb's blood and said "boy, I sure hope I don't get violently eviscerated today."
Any flimsy or tangential points you are making are completely deconstructed by your insistence of certain facts that are not only subjective, but more importantly outdated. You carry yourself like a man with a grudge, and you are in the wrong thread to be acting that way.
Years old? You mean the NeoGAF thread from November 2012 where everyone was trashing Sega? Really old.
I think the fact (that's right--fact) that this game is bombing is enough evidence that this game wasn't priced properly. If you read my posts, I haven't once commented on the quality of the game. I've only been talking about the fact that given the market, this game was not priced properly.
I've been trying to create a profile for this game in the Nvidia Panel, but I'm not really sure forcing any setting gives a better image quality to this game. I'll try again tomorrow and really check anti-aliasing especially. I have a GTX 660 with 2 GB of VRAM, so I should be able to put some crazy AA processing for this game. But when I tried modifying the general settings in the panel, I didn't notice any change.
I'm playing in 720p resolution (my TV's native resolution). I tried using the AA option of the game. Doesn't really change anything, or maybe it's just me.
Furthermore, when people respond to your complaints, you nitpick technicalities in their arguments like it's something that actually matters.
Try going to your C:\Users\(YourUserName)\Documents folder, head to the SART folder, and delete the settings.xml file inside.
That should reset it to the default state.
Nitpick "technicalities?" You mean "pointing out that your entire argument was based on a lie?"
Good fucking god the derail.
How does Mario Kart fit into your strange view?
Do we know if the best sellers chart on Steam also includes titles bought on external sites? Because I'd wager a fair chunk of people who bought it on PC picked it up from sites like GMG.If what I'm seeing is true, it's actually selling better on PC than it did on consoles. That won't be known for certain, because Valve doesn't release Steam sales figures, but it was in the top 20 best sellers for a while and is slowly falling.
In most places, the console versions failed to even chart.
Do we know if the best sellers chart on Steam also includes titles bought on external sites? Because I'd wager a fair chunk of people who bought it on PC picked it up from sites like GMG.
However, that stigma has never existed for the PC marketplace, at least. SEGA's always had a strange fascination with the PC platform ever since the 90s, and they have worked well to bring PC gamers, especially in the last few years, excellent ports of their titles, support developers under their wing, and treat their customers with respect and release their titles at very reasonable prices.
In this case, walking into a topic where almost everyone is really enjoying the game and citing why they shouldn't be enjoying it, or why the game isn't good, or the company that made it isn't good, or whatever.
It just came out, and it's at #29 right now. That's not good. Games that sold well are in the top 5 for weeks.
There is an easy way to get an estimate:
How many people are on the game's leaderboards on PC?
I'm not terribly surprised since it's a game that came out on consoles several months ago and was better marketed to them.
For the same reason a lot of mediocre Nintendo games such as New Super Mario Bros. sold extremely well: there were a lot of Gamecubes and Wiis collecting dust, and there was simply nothing else to play.
How many people are playing now is hardly indicative of how many it sold. I got a reasonably good score in the first GP on it and I was placed 1500. So try harder.Well, there are 3200 people playing Dark Souls on Steam right now, and there are 600 playing Sonic.
And just for reference, Football Manager 2013, which was released in November, has 55,976 people playing on Steam right now.
Obviously they haven't heard about Sega's terrible reputation on PC.
You realize that Sports Interactive had a _long_ history of Championship Manager games before Sega ever bought them?
You realize that most of the people who play the manager games couldn't care less about the publisher?
In fact, for more than half of the existence of Sports Interactive, they had nothing to do with Sega.
So why did you pick it as a specific comparison?
It's an example of a game that stayed in Steam's top 10 for multiple weeks.
There's lots of games that have done that. If Sega being the publisher isn't significant, why did you specifically choose that one?
Because I just recently noted it being in the top 10 for a while. If you want another example, Skyrim on Steam still has 35,594 players right now. It's a single player game, and it's over a year old, and it still has that many people playing on Steam. Now that's a game that sold well.
People are complaining about the price? It was available for $25 with $5 in credit on Amazon. If that's too expensive for a quality game at launch, then you need to find a new hobby.