Phobophile said:
With net neutrality creeping up on us just around the corner, this is even less likely to happen.
On the contrary, video and game download services are more likely to happen without net neutrality.
Currently the economics are that you pay a flat rate for unlimited transfer of any kind of data. ISPs do not discriminate between different kinds of data transfer -- this is the definition of net neutrality.
This encourages ISPs to vastly oversubscribe their networks -- the more people they cram onto their networks, the more money they make. But this means each person gets less bandwidth, and the ISPs are inclined to throttle or go after heavy users "abusing" the network.
If net-neutrality goes away, then your ISP can charge premium fees for certain types of traffic. The economics then totally change, because if they can charge more money for, say, video or game downloads, then it's to their advantage to have people use more of that kind of traffic, not less.
As demand goes up, they make more money, and hence are incented to upgrade their networks and reserve bandwidth for those premium customers.
To be clear, I prefer the current system of net-neutrality, but I just think the economics is going to force tiered service to become a reality in the near future.
To some extent the loss of net-neutrality is already happening -- I've heard that Comcast will go after you if you "abuse" your upload bandwidth, and either cut your service or throttle you unless you subscribe to a higher plan.