The Overwatch type of hero shooters do not do it for me and personally I don't really view COD as a hero arena shooter
What does my opinion on a single player game that isn't even on PS have to do with anything I said?! You went out of your way to look through my post because my opinion and 99% of this thread thinks gaas is lame for Sony. You could at least try not to look like such a sensitive fanboy.
Sadly for an old fart like myself that show proves I will be keeping a lot more of my moneySony has a sense of direction. Some of us just don't like it....
After seeing people actually having fun with Hellblade 2 the past week, and after this shitshow today, it might be asking too much for that poor fanboy soul to try to look reasonable.
Well they do have 2 ceos now. That kind of screams uncertainty does it not?
They can push these games like Concord all they want but they will still be getting their Astro Bot kind of money from me. I did see about four games I am interested in so I did not find the show a flop considering it was a SOP and I expected less. As I said in another thread though, I have lower expectations so it balances out for me.
I want them to free Bloodborne from PS4 hardware limitations and port it to PC. After that they can do whatever.
Nah, people also said helldivers 2 would be DOA and that it looked like a very generic GAAS trash.
That rarely works.....because the biggest target for these GAAS ages are people who mostly buy Sports games, COD and Fortnite and nothing else.
Sounds fair.
Yeah, I don't care about story elements in most games, especially GAAS games. I could give two shits about any kind of narrative focus for a GAAS game. It is pretty dumb imo. Gameplay is king and it looks pretty good imo. And I doubt Sony would release this game if they didn't think it could at the very minimum compete with Overwatch
Just vote with your weapon of choice in this case. These filthy casuals dont need to breath the same air as us.
It could also scream solidarity and teamwork (Between PS Japan and PS EU/US). It's all about how one perceives it because we simply don't know yet.Well they do have 2 ceos now. That kind of screams uncertainty does it not?
That's going overboard, casuals or not they can play what they want doesn't matter what we think.
Hey don't blame me, I heard crazy absurd shit around here, at this point it's hard to tell who's joking and who's not.
Ok everyone, we are shutting down the neogafs!
Add on coof lockdowns and wfh, and you're entirely on the money.
It was inevitable, and probably better for it to turn out this way. At some point, someone at PlayStation wss going to walk into a meeting promising the moon on a stick with gaas shit. Sony needed to go all in so they could get burned in significant ways, otherwise, this period of "experimentation" would've lasted even longer.
I just finished it. It is an exceptional game with more character, soul and heart than most new games on the market.
You think that's good? Is not good for them neither us.
Nokia thought the same in the mobile market.
This.
To be fair to him though he put more effort than Sony did for that state of play lolThis thread...
No, I don't.
Poor comparison. There's a grand total of about four companies in the world who can afford to enter the home console video game market and take the initial losses necessary to establish a brand at this stage. And one of them is already in and is struggling. There's no dark horse here; there's no revolutionary new home console experience to be had that upends the entire market and ousts the deeply entrenched monopoly. Sony won.
Nokia thought the same with physical buttons before touchscreens came out of nowhere and redefined the mobile experience. Market preferences can shift dramatically. Blackberry seemed invincible once.
You highlighted two GaaS games from 15+ game show for your agenda. One isn't even developed by Sony (Marvel Rivals). Additionally, most of the games they showed are multi platform.
