They must have realized PS6 costs as they happen every year and included them under R&D or somethingYeah, this is craziest thing to me. They are projecting 30% more profit in 2026 despite PS6 spending and HW losses, wich is crazy.
First party games make around twice the yearly revenue they did before he was promoted to head of first party games. Around half of that comes from their successful expansion to new game types (mostly multiplayer and gaas) and platforms (mostly PC). They also won a ton of awards and nominations. These are the reasons of why instead of firing him promoted him to CEO of SIE Stubio Business Group.Hulst is the Phil Spencer of SONY.
The billions he has wasted, he needs to be fired ASAP..
Q1 is traditionally weakest selling quarter for Playstation, but I expect the numbers to be effected by price increases for Q2 and Q3, they will pick up a little in Q4 because of GTA6. 2027 will fare slightly better (not much) due to GTA6 and possible price reductions throughout 2027Not too bad in the current market. Next quarter will be telling, even more q4. We need GTA.
As someone that isn't particularly excited for Grand Theft Auto, this is seriously underestimating the franchise's power amongst normies. The same folks who only buy COD, sportsball, and maybe Fortnite will absolutely upgrade from a PS4 to a PS5 just for this game.I don't think it will close the gap. Not at $600 for a PS5 Digital.
In about 25 minutesDid they have there q and a? Will be interesting if any mention of the shift in pc strategy.
"This grass field is perfect for a picnic, except for that overgrown mutated radioactive Tyrannosaurus Rex with mounted rocket launchers."this year it has no real competition in the console market, except for Nintendo.
Numbers still look decent compared to xbox obviously, but with so lil competition u would think sony would be in much better state, both console units sold and actual profit, u can tell their terrible move of banking on gaas has nasty consequences.
It could have been higher. Imagine if Naughty Dog, Bend, and Guerrilla Games had released a game in 2026 or fy25. Instead, they wasted time on GaaS games.What's better than "all time high profits"?
Alltime high profits defo not this quarter, and with crazy inflation/value of dollar so low ofc sony has "higher" profits this gen vs ps2 gen, its like saying guy making 100k yearly salary in 2026 makes more than guy making 50k yearly in 1980s, yet the old fuck could afford buying proper house in safe subburbian area on his salary yet " higher earner" has to rent relatively small place in not so safe hood insteadWhat's better than "all time high profits"?
You know that PlayStation gets the majority of games released unlike Nintendo or Xbox. So 10% is not as bad as you think.Their first party titles sold less than 10% of the total games sold unit wise, well no wonder since their first party output is far from being the best. On the other hand, now I understand why they can closed their studios without much second thought, since Sony literally can survive well without them.
While I agree it would have been better if ND or Bend released a game in 2025, none of that is going to mean shit in 2026. Wolverine is going to bring in more profit and revenue than whatever Guerrilla Games or Bend can put out, ND game sales may be close to Wolverine though. Anyway, none of that matters when they have GTA6 releasing this year (which is more or less an exclusive for them). GTA6 will bring in more money and revenue that all those games combined. The sales in both hardware and software it will bring in will make numbers from ND, Bend, GG or Insomniac look like drops in the bucket.It could have been higher. Imagine if Naughty Dog, Bend, and Guerrilla Games had released a game in 2026 or fy25. Instead, they wasted time on GaaS games.
This is very true. It's not just that they get the majority of games they also get the lion's share of third party sales of all consoles. They sell way more third party games than MS and Nintendo combined. This is the problem when people use percentages to jump to conclusions, we get situations like this where the percentages are used without context to paint whatever picture people want to see instead of actual reality.You know that PlayStation gets the majority of games released unlike Nintendo or Xbox. So 10% is not as bad as you think.
Am I the only one who sees, and this time for real, a new generation of consoles as absolutely unnecessary? Between the current ones performing really well, the fact that truly good games are hardly being released anymore, and the current prices being exorbitant, the thought of a new gadget now, just to spend more and more money on...nothing, fills me with a tremendous amount of dread.