When it stops being about a game and more about justifying your system.
When it brought nothing to the discussion. So, since always.
It has nothing to do with money or bragging. It could be any system. It's called an example.
I still doubt it, even if it's true, where would that game sell considering its audience is on Playstation.
To be fair, this is a remake of the good games in the series, not the bad ones you played.
A begging show isn't better than a shitshow.
Crash threads got ruined by the endless portbegging.
So this has a chance of going to Switch or not? What about other platforms?
People seem to get very defensive over whether or not this is exclusive, im just asking why would it matter if it wasnt? Then more people get to play it, how is that bad?
either way make no mistake the boxart is a great representation of how the games have aged
Just to be sure I understand you correctly: because they never clarified that it's exclusive, it's definetly exclusive. And if it was exclusive to another platform (nobody ever expected this) the response would be different how exactly? I don't think they ever gave a response to anything. I probably misunderstood you because nothing here makes sense to me.
Switch is out since 2 months. This is a platformer and if Nintendo's audience would be associated with one genre it's that one. Do you really see them releasing this rather on Xbox than Switch? Do you think it would sell more on the former?
When did hoping a great game comes to you're preferred platform become a bad thing and get a dumb term like port begging.
It's like what don't people understand? As of today, right now it has not been confirmed for any other platform except PS4. That by definition is exclusive, and if it makes people feel better, just say unofficially.
I think what we are seeing here is the result of an unfinished deal, with options. If sales numbers are good for both parties, Sony can pony(that came out like that) up for the rest of the exclusivity. I.e move units, sell millions, bundles,etc. and for that exclusivity has to be left in the air for now. If it's not worth it, acti will port the holy hell outta that game.
....if otherwise, why stop at the Switch? Let it hit all platforms, MS sold a shit ton of minecraft bundles. They have banjo, yooka laylee, etc. And like 30 million more players out there. That's why
You're not exactly helping yourself here dude. It's announced exclusively for one system only at the moment. There's a possibility, since it's not owned by Sony, that it will come to other platforms. There's also a possibility that it won't and the same amount of evidence supports both sides. Until then dropping by to say, "hur not buying it now, waiting!" is not the same as saying "this would be great on the go with Switch".As thought - it's nonsense.
Explain? What are other people bringing to the discussion by being hyped for it on one platform? It's an independently owned IP and it's ports of games that are 20+ years old. Entire thread premise is that it *might* not be exclusive.
You're not exactly helping yourself here dude. It's announced exclusively for one system only at the moment. There's a possibility, since it's not owned by Sony, that it will come to other platforms. There's also a possibility that it won't and the same amount of evidence supports both sides. Until then dropping by to say, "hur not buying it now, waiting!" is not the same as saying "this would be great on the go with Switch".
Activions owns everything about Crash including the OG games (I think). But Sony has publishing rights for the OG games. Vicarious built the game from the ground up BUT used ND's original level geometry to rebuild the gameplay from scratch. So basically this where the line is drawned between Sony and Activision, otherwise it would be 100% an Activision product.
I'll be knee deep in this game while others twiddle their thumbs hoping it comes to their hardware of choice.
I guarantee there are at least two other playstation exclusives you want to play as well so it will easily justify the investment.
The majority of people who are hyped for this game already played it, come on.
In literally losing money by not buying a PlayStation 4 Entertainment SystemPS4's are so cheap now that its a no brainer to purchase if you really want to play this game. I guarantee there are at least two other playstation exclusives you want to play as well so it will easily justify the investment.
PS4's are so cheap now that its a no brainer to purchase if you really want to play this game. I guarantee there are at least two other playstation exclusives you want to play as well so it will easily justify the investment.
No, player base doesn't mean much, just pointing out the Xbox' should not easily be ignored if (when) it were to go multiplat. I think it will get ported for sure but it's exclusivity in limbo is quite peculiar.There have been multiple occasions where people could've thought that it's not exclusive, such as that PR twitter account posting exactly that and then paddling back or the "exclusive for PS4" sign missing in promotional art. Rest makes sense of course.
I never said it should stop at the Switch, it's just strange to assume it would rather come to Xbox than that. Of course it would be the best scenario if it came out everywhere including PC. Playerbase doesnt mean much (just look at Horizon sales on that install base compared to Zelda's) especially when its a rather niche genre like 3D platformers.
Just mentioning that if this release saw that sort of success, whether it would become multiplatform or not would no longer be a question.
I'll be knee deep in this game while others twiddle their thumbs hoping it comes to their hardware of choice.
The more people who are able to play a game, the better. There's no acceptable justification for wanting to see art made less available.
That's great, I hope you enjoy it.
Personally I don't think a Crash Bandicoot remaster is worth dropping $300 on a Playstation 4, so I'll gladly continue to twiddle my thumbs.
Totally different situation.I'm not going to play Super Mario Odyessy until it's available on PC and Xbox 360!
Lately, there have been a ungodly amount of 'switch version when?' posts....for better or worse.
I will not be surprised if switch owners are gonna portbeg if bloodborne 2 got Announced or something.
I'm not going to play Super Mario Odyessy until it's available on PC and Xbox 360!
Maybe you forgot how much ps4 owners port begged for xcom 2, of course everybody forgot because this board is as console biased as you can get.its not just switch owners that will portbeg if a potential sequel is announced only on ps4
the great thing about being a ps4 owner is I don't have to portbeg. i backed the winning horse.
That's great, I hope you enjoy it.
Personally I don't think a Crash Bandicoot remaster is worth dropping $300 on a Playstation 4, so I'll gladly continue to twiddle my thumbs.
It's just pretty stupid that Activision is not commenting on this. Would help a lot.
Holy shit at this guys Twitter and YouTube... Just pure sadness...
Maybe you forgot how much ps4 owners port begged for xcom 2, of course everybody forgot because this board is as console biased as you can get.
more importantly, these are remakes of the OG playstation trilogy, and those games never released outside of playstation. that's the only thing that confuses me but I suppose since nsane is a new product, sony doesn't own the rights to them.To be fair, this is a remake of the good games in the series, not the bad ones you played.
its not just switch owners that will portbeg if a potential sequel is announced only on ps4
the great thing about being a ps4 owner is I don't have to portbeg. i backed the winning horse.
Who cares if it is or isn't.
I was hoping for 6 months max :/
It's not worth even dropping $30 on, some might say. The idea that all of the top tier exclusive games on PS4 don't tempt someone but a remaster of three aggressively mediocre platformers from 20 years ago does is kind of hurting my head.
That said, I see no reason this shouldn't be multiplatform. It's third party, it's been generations since the character was Sony exclusive, and I can't imagine the money Sony would have to pay Activision to get timed exclusivity could possibly be worth it just for the six people who would buy a console for Crash fucking Bandicoot in 2017.
If Mario had more than 80% of his titles on other platforms then yeah that would be the same.