dillingerx
Banned
You said that,not me. MGS4's character models were the only thing that were slightly impressive. The enviorments were way below averageSholmes said:
-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Splinter Cell 4 X360 images
- Thread starter AltogetherAndrews
- Start date
PS3 fans love the graphics hyperbole.
There is more detail in this fingernail than your entire battlefield of soldiers! There are more advanced physics in this salt shaker demonstration than your entire raging forest fire! The lighting that illuminates Snake's nostril is 1000x more impressive than Gears of War!
There is more detail in this fingernail than your entire battlefield of soldiers! There are more advanced physics in this salt shaker demonstration than your entire raging forest fire! The lighting that illuminates Snake's nostril is 1000x more impressive than Gears of War!
The difference is that this generation, PS2 fans developed their own standard for graphics based not on things that the Xbox couldn't do, but rather things that PS2-exclusive developers did particularly well. Now that same narrow-minded elitism has caused them to call into question the very existence of anything non-Playstation. Xbox fanboys were just idiots in many regards. "OMG LOOK AT THE SUCKY PS2 GRFX." but there's a new breed of snobs that makes those folks preferable by comparison.
Red Blaster
Member
dillingerx said:
:lol
Below average? Is that why people were clamoring "CG!" when it was unveiled?
Ninja Scooter
Member
Speevy said:
who gives a fuck? You put way to much thought into something so unimportant.
PhoenixDark
Banned
From a graphical perspective, this game is not impressing me that much. Sure, it looks good. But, I can't help but see Riddick 1.2. For some reason, the pics posted here look better than the ones in GI (although they are the same 
).
I'm sure it'll look much much better in a few months. And, it's also good to see Ubisoft took some of my ideas about the storyline...
). I'm sure it'll look much much better in a few months. And, it's also good to see Ubisoft took some of my ideas about the storyline...
mckmas8808
Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
PhoenixDark said:From a graphical perspective, this game is not impressing me that much. Sure, it looks good. But, I can't help but see Riddick 1.2. For some reason, the pics posted here look better than the ones in GI (although they are the same
I'm sure it'll look much much better in a few months. And, it's also good to see Ubisoft took some of my ideas about the storyline...
One of them is made on the Xbox while the some of the other pics are from the XBox 360
dillingerx
Banned
*Points to my post with the picture comparison a few posts back*dark10x said:
:lol lmao
Ryu too
SolidSnakex
Member
Blaster1X said:
That trailer isn't a target demo like Madden, that's MGS4.
Red Blaster
Member
Blaster1X said:Your goggles are stretch to tight around your bighead.
I've seen better environments on 360 games. but we are comparing games..not demo target videos, right?
You're not very bright, are you?
The thing about MGS4, is that it seems to be taking the same path we saw in MGS2 and 3. They focus on the scene as a whole, rather than the smallest details...which results in an overall more impressive looking experience. Doom 3 actually did this as well, back on the PC. If you examined any of its textures closely, you'd see how blurry they'd become...but the actual per scene detail and texture variety was way beyond what we were used to.
Late Stage Marxist
Member
A couple people flew off the handle in this thread :lol
Pac-man gameplay is right, at least until Subsistence comes out. The overhead camera in MGS3 was atrocious. I haven't played any of the SC sequels so I can't comment on their quality, but graphically they've always kept up with Konami.
If these scans were from a Japanese rag the OP would be in the clear...
Pac-man gameplay is right, at least until Subsistence comes out. The overhead camera in MGS3 was atrocious. I haven't played any of the SC sequels so I can't comment on their quality, but graphically they've always kept up with Konami.
If these scans were from a Japanese rag the OP would be in the clear...
Late Stage Marxist
Member
Speevy said:
Now look at SC4's environments.
Well, I can hardly make out anything in the background, but I know nothing about anything that's going on in that scene.
Anyway, I meant that Metal Gear Solid 3 isn't as technically impressive as Splinter Cell Chaos Theory, obviously. I hate this genre with a passion, so you won't see me championing the gameplay of these series.
Anyway, I meant that Metal Gear Solid 3 isn't as technically impressive as Splinter Cell Chaos Theory, obviously. I hate this genre with a passion, so you won't see me championing the gameplay of these series.
BigBoss said::lol
You're so pathetic, watch the trailer and tell me thats a highres PS2 game, some people still don't believe that its realtime.
I am pathetic?
"Look at the enviroments"
"(the enviroments) look like a high-res PS2 game"
<BigBoss posts pics of a character model>
You might want to request a firmware upgrade from Sony Automated Defense System.
HomerSimpson-Man
Member
Did people actually just call MGS4 a high res PS2 game? WTF, just WTF people?
These are the things I've read about Metal Gear Solid 4.
60,000 polygons in the hair
Physics like things burning on the ground and paper blowing all around
Most complex uses of HDR lighting ever
Unprecedented level of character animation
Most impressive character lighting ever
Most expressive and detailed characters ever
Huge organic world
Such a game doesn't need to be excused for its backgrounds. They just need more detail before...2007? 2008?
60,000 polygons in the hair
Physics like things burning on the ground and paper blowing all around
Most complex uses of HDR lighting ever
Unprecedented level of character animation
Most impressive character lighting ever
Most expressive and detailed characters ever
Huge organic world
Such a game doesn't need to be excused for its backgrounds. They just need more detail before...2007? 2008?