This thread depresses me because I can't really defend myself. I spend too much time in front of computers and video games. 21 years old, never been in a relationship.
It hurts because, while I don't agree with everything the guy says, I think there could be something to what he is saying. Regardless, I do not want to project my life onto others either.
FroJay said:I agree with him, the next generation is screwed.
Sounds like some hardcore moralizing agenda, but I'm glad to see we finally found a solution to the overpopulation crisis: all we need to do is get all the guys competing in StarCraft instead of football.
Also, has Philip Zimbardo done anything remotely relevant since the Stanford prison experiment? Feel like every time I see his name other than that it's in connection to some sensational bullshit news item.
Before video games the next generation was screwed because of TV shows and McDonalds, and before that the next generation was screwed because of Dungeons and Dragons, and before that the next generation was screwed because of hippies/Woodstock, and before that the next generation was screwed because of Elvis, and before that the next generation was screwed because of radio, and before that the next generation was screwed because of newspapers. Given the staggering amount of vapid mainstream pop-culture dependie ruining that has apparently accumulated over time, it's a miracle that we're not all hairy monkeys sitting around in a circle eating our own feces (while pressing buttons on our TV controller to headshot tentacled anime lesbians and listen to Satanic rock and roll) with absolutely no interest in boring things like Talking To Other Organisms or Having Sex With Non-Sterile Human Beings.
Let's look over the ridiculous vocabulary and really dive into the message here.
Many men are changing. However, there is more to it than video games and pornography. There are many variables in play as to what's happening. There is an economic evolution taking place in which more young males are given more time to themselves because employment is much harder to gain. In addition to that, I feel the advent of expanded social networking is currently creating a social revolution. Within these new thoughts, we see an acceptance of online culture, those who would rather be spending their time in cyber space than out looking for work, getting a date, ect.
I'm not saying video games and pornography have no blame, but they are more of a side effect to underlying issues.
Not sure how porn makes people risk-averse, though.
I play PC games, like STALKER, so if anything, I'm the exact opposite of risk-averse, because I play the hardest video games out there. I can handle anything!
Not sure how porn makes people risk-averse, though.
I can agree with some of that as well. This issues (if you can call it one) is not black and white, there's a little bit of truth to both sides.
As for my situation, I thought about it and it's just a matter of wanting to change your situation. You either want to change it, or you don't. There may be people out there who are content to keeping themselves out of a relationship, and if that's truly what they want, what can you do about it? I don't consider myself to be one of these people, but I'm sure they exist.
Stop playing games, Timmy! Do some coke and go out and about!
Do you really feel you can blame games and pornography for how you may or may not have ended up? Keep in mind, I'm not digging at you whatsoever. However, I feel besides my above reason which were painted for later adults, that social upbringing, parental guidance, and proper education have more of an effect on how a human will interact later in life.
wasn't the MTV generation meant to grow up with no attention span?
Don't people understand, if we get rid of anything fun then the only thing we have left to do is be super productive workers and breed like rabbits supporting short term economics because it forces us to spend more money and work harder to earn more.
THIS IS THE LIFE WE ALL SHOULD BE ASPIRING TOWARDS.
No, absolutely not. The problem lies in whether or not a person is able to moderate the amount of time the spend on those activities.
I can relate to this.
True in my experience.
Rings true for me too, unfortunately.
No friends. Tick. Never had a girlfriend. Tick. Don't fit in. Tick.
to me it sounds backwards.
I think it's more that the social systems and institutions are the ones failing men not the other way around.
If a study comes out and shows that female students are better at standardized testing then male students, what does that tell us? Doesn't mean girls are smarter, only that they do better on tests. Now if the education system, which relies on these types of tests, create studies which determine a students congnitive faculties, its going to show men underperforming. It doesn't deal with the issue, it just creates a generalization of the problem. If however, the education system used videogames to determine cognitive abilities, what then would the studies show?
if anything it's an issue of cultural, institutional, and social issues, that are creating the demise of men.
Alright men, it was a honor
Time to start reading up on our new mandated bible:
![]()
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat?
Anyway, what's so bad about it? It's natural selection at its finest: if these people never form families, their "solitary tendency" genes will be eventually culled away from the gene pool and the extroverted will rule the world, whereas in the past they were unnaturally led into reproduction by arranged marriages and such.
Rings true for me too, unfortunately.
No friends. Tick. Never had a girlfriend. Tick. Don't fit in. Tick.
I think I got why porn will lead to humanity extinction. Young males that abuse its consumption will think that every sexual intercourse ends with ejaculating on their partners face. Functional sterilization.
Going by my girlfriend's needs, it might as well end like that all the time, yeah.
the extinction of men is a small price to pay for futanari
You think it's bad now? Wait until someone brings a viable sex-bot to market.