And he was immortalized for it too:
![]()
He has the good hair.
And he was immortalized for it too:
![]()
Enjoyed both Celebrations 3 and 4. Great times.
I remember the audience going nuts and demanding them play the footage again. It was insanely awesome.
Save the fact that we get constent releases of comic arcs in animation form. It doesn't have to be a live action film. What is so terrible about an animated Shadows of the Empire or Heir to the Empire however?
JonTron. Semi-famous Youtube personality. He's a pretty funny guy.
play the footage again
No one is saying it's terrible, it's just not worth the effort from Disney's end. Why invest time and money into movies -- live action, animated, theatrical, DTV, whatever -- that aren't going to expand your brand?
Star Wars bout to Attack the Block. Let's get tooled up bruv!!
I haven't been since C3, but it was a hell of a time. I only went to 2 and 3 because they were in Indianapolis, and I was close to there at the time. I would love to go to more, especially if they have gotten more organized since then.
Weird that there is only one woman but very promising cast otherwise.
But isn't that the definitio of Brand expanding? Especially since they are literaly creating a new brand with "Star Wars Legends."
Was going to go to C7 before this whole EU mess. Don' think that is going to happen now though. Would have been fun to see another Spectacular.
I wouldn't let the EU thing bother you too much. Of course that's your opinion and prerogative and I won't press it too much, but Star Wars is Star Wars.
Anyway are the Celebrations strictly in LA now?
Not when you're investing into a completely alternate continuity. Expanding your brand shouldn't entail confusing your audience.
Also, isn't "Legends" just a rebranding of the EU? It's a banner meant to distinguish the older stuff from the newer ones; it's not creating something new.
edit: I also don't understand why so many people are acting like this came out of nowhere. Hasn't it always been Lucasfilm's position for years that only the movies are absolute canon and everything else is lower on the ladder? It's not like they pulled a bait and switch where stories that definitely mattered at one point now definitely don't; they had always relegated the EU to a lesser status.
It's odd to describe, because for me growing up Star Wars wasn't on the big screen, it was on pages and in game cartridges. Hell, I played Shadows of the Empire before I ever finished ANH. I guess it's a generational thing.
And he was immortalized for it too:
![]()
No one is telling you otherwise, just that the new films aren't bogged down by it. And as far as I know, the EU was basically like comic books, with many different angles and directions. I don't think they were ever supposed to be tied with the films.
If you enjoy stories, no one can take that from you. The fact is that since they want to do more films with new characters and stories, they want to be able to have free reign on what direction they go in without the authors of those books and such dictating how they're supposed to be written, because the EU was never made to govern any future films, just be side stuff that fans could get into.
Be nice if the girl was the protagonist.
I was under the impression that they didn't say they were wiping everything EU-related away, just that they wouldn't be beholden to it. So they might reuse EU concepts that worked, but if they changed stuff which then "overrode" the EU, then so be it.But I think what bothers me the most is the rumored direction. If Luke is going to have a wife he looks like and acts like Mara Jade then why not just call her Mara Jade? Same thing if the Solos have twins. The whole notion that they are taking EU themes and renaming them is beyond stupid.
True.
Or the black guy.
I like both versions. I really don't see a problem with that prequel image you posted. It felt like Star Wars to me as much as that photo you showed of the AT-ATs.
I was under the impression that they didn't say they were wiping everything EU-related away, just that they wouldn't be beholden to it. So they might reuse EU concepts that worked, but if they changed stuff which then "overrode" the EU, then so be it.
Sorry, I don't have quotes/links, but maybe someone remembers where I would've read this?
I never wanted EU adapted into these new movies, nor did I want these movies to use too many elements are familar theme(such as a Vong invasion). I wanted these movies to exist along with it and tell all new stories, but ones that didn't intentionally override stories told elsewhere. It would have been nice to here about Dash Rendar or the Clone Emperor but those elements don't need to be the focus.
Surely Lucas didn't personally authorize everything in the EU? Honest question - I really don't know how the EU works (I've read a handful of books, but that's it), but that's a lot of material (comics, books, games etc) for just him to act as sole gatekeeper.Probelm is though, where there was originally one there are now many in charge. I am very curious to see what happens if down the road a screenwriter or director actually mentions Thrawn or the Vong on film.
I read something like that as well.
Probelm is though, where there was originally one there are now many in charge. I am very curious to see what happens if down the road a screenwriter or director actually mentions Thrawn or the Vong on film.
Surely Lucas didn't personally authorize everything in the EU? Honest question - I really don't know how the EU works (I've read a handful of books, but that's it), but that's a lot of material (comics, books, games etc) for just him to act as sole gatekeeper.
HE. WILL. RETURN.
![]()
When Cloud City was being evacuated he didn't rescue his wife. He didn't rescue his children. He rescued the mother fucking ice cream maker.
And he was immortalized for it too:
![]()
How would that happen? There aren't a lot of prospective writers/directors that have had meetings with Kennedy/Abrams/Kinberg/Kasdan, and the ones that have are VERY unlikely to have knowledge of the EU, or really anything outside of the movies anyway.
Surely Lucas didn't personally authorize everything in the EU? Honest question - I really don't know how the EU works (I've read a handful of books, but that's it), but that's a lot of material (comics, books, games etc) for just him to act as sole gatekeeper.
Star Wars is just such a massive thing that there are all kinds of perspectives and knowledge banks at play. They just want to make more films, and they want to make them like they're envisioning, and they don't want to be tied down to a bunch of extraneous stuff that shouldn't have any say over what they do. It's easy for a bunch of authors to throw a bunch of randomness at the canvas, but expecting the filmmakers to know every single thing they do and have did is beyond reason. That's why they're saying the EU isn't canon to the films; not because they disrespect the EU or its fans, but rather that they just want to be able to work from a clean slate.
I'm specifically saying that the people who have been mentioned as possibly making spinoff films (Joe Johnston, Zack Snyder, Lawrence Kasdan) probably have zero knowledge of Thrawn or the Vong so the scenario the previous poster brought up is likely not happening anyway.
I'm unsure if you're just using my post to extend the point, or if you actually think I was agreeing with the poster I was responding to (I don't.)
I'm unsure if you're just using my post to extend the point
This. We're on the same page. I don't believe any of the filmmakers should know the EU top to bottom or even be influenced by it.
You're all killing me here... I'm seriously loling.
And brandonh83 and LastNac, what's the deal whis this Rick guy you keep metioning?
And brandonh83 and LastNac, what's the deal whis this Rick guy you keep metioning?
Rick McCallum. The ultimate yes man.
The producer of the prequels, Rick McCallum. He was a yes man because George Lucas is a genius and didn't want to cross his path.
It's only been 30 years. They were in their 20's. This would put them in their 50's.
Fisher and Hamill were 30 ish. Ford was early 40s I think.
Rick McCallum. The ultimate yes man.
The producer of the prequels, Rick McCallum. He was a yes man because George Lucas is a genius and didn't want to cross his path.
Well, if Kyle Newman gets the job...How would that happen? There aren't a lot of prospective writers/directors that have had meetings with Kennedy/Abrams/Kinberg/Kasdan, and the ones that have are VERY unlikely to have knowledge of the EU, or really anything outside of the movies anyway.
The black guy IS the protagonist. He's the lead.
It hasn't been confirmed who is the "lead" yet.
Nah we minorites need this one!I'm guessing something of a shared lead, like Luke, Han and Leia, but it's possible that Boyega is the "Luke," or central protagonist.
...that being said, please let it be Daisy. Nothing whatsoever against Boyega, he seems super cool and I'm about to watch Attack the Block later, but I just really want a female lead-lead in the new films.
Michael Stackpole (I believe it was Stackpole) has a story about the one time he got to "meet" George Lucas. Basically they took him up to the ranch for a lunch meeting and purposefully sat George at a table near him and waited to see how he would react. Ultimately he didn't freak out and the lunch meeting went fine and he would go on to do the X-Wing books and all the Corran Horn/NJO stuff. That seems to be about as much interaction the EU novel people had with Lucas anyway.From what I read, aside from approving/suggesting the plot of Dark Empire, and suggesting concepts on The Clone Wars TV show (recent one, not the excellent Genndy Tartakovsky one a few years back, Lucas does not even read EU material. While I do think he has to personally authorize every project, I think aside from then synopsis they give him, he reads any more than that.
Apparently he and his son love to play Battlefront though...