Charles Foster Kane
Rosebud
You mean like the coming to america thing?
You could also start lining up.
You mean like the coming to america thing?
You don't have to assume, it's official. Luke's clothes in ROTJ was supposed to be the uniform of "trained Jedi Knights."
Some gaffer actually did this way back when, lolz.
How could Lucas retcon this? That's a much more badass look than everyone looking like Obi-Wan.
![]()
Man. Who knew Coruscant had 3 suns shining at it from all kinds of angles?
btw the reason most of Episode 2 looks like shoddy compositing is simple:
It was one of the first digital HD camcorder projects, they actually shot some material for action scenes on lossy HDCam tape which had super crappy compression. Imagine ILM trying to get good greenscreen keying results with basically heavily compressed 720p material and then on top of that there was the occasional: "This scene was lit and shot to emulate nighttime lighting, but can we now have Padme also stand at the window and have the scene at sunny daytime?"
I also remember McCallum talking about how cool it was to zoom into the image and choose a different framing after the image was shot. *sigh*
I think Lucas desperately lacked proper storyboarding and previs for the prequels. Like proper previs. EVERYTHING, not just action scenes.
In many regards Lucas was a bit too early with Episodes I-III. Digital HD format was not really there yet, the previs culture was non existent and CG reality was not fully at DAVY JONES/AVATAR levels yet.
But I though Star Wars happened in a past. I won't think much of it, I'll just accept it.
You summed it up perfectly for me. I always felt Episode III was the best visually due to how good those advancements got in 2005.
To add to that when Lucas looked at a cut of ESB he screamed that Kershner had ruined Star Wars and went to make a new cut that had more action and got rid of that slow placed character building parts. He showed it to some, they told him the truth. It was awful. He relented and later admited they were right.
Considering ESB has been considered the best I'm sure that really struck his ego.
Lucas is a fucking awful director.
He's bad because of his lack of humility, but his actual skill is pretty good, if not really good. A New Hope was a very well directed movie.It's fine being an awful director(no not really but whatever) but Lucas lacks the humility to see that he might be wrong about certain things.
Basically, this minus the sarcasm.So A New Hope is badly directed? He made all the wrong choices with casting, sets, locations, script, the team and all? Amazing it ever got a sequel.
So A New Hope is badly directed? He made all the wrong choices with casting, sets, locations, script, the team and all? Amazing it ever got a sequel.
He's bad because of his lack of humility, but his actual skill is pretty good, if not really good. A New Hope was a very well directed movie.
Does the dark side block people's sense of reason? It didn't seem to be the case in the OT, but the way Anakin just went along with the kids and separatists murders after finding out the emperor didn't even know how to save Padme for sure just bugs me. The fact he's still there even after she dies is, ugh.
Thinking doesn't go well with the prequels.
It gets explained a lot better in the official novel for Episode 3. By the time he figures out Palpatine has played him for a fool all he has left is Palpatine. He's killed the Jedi, Led to the death of the woman he loved etc. He's left crippled and a shell of the man he was before so resigns himself to the fact Palpatine is the only one left and accepts that fate as he is no longer powerful enough to deal with Palpatine himself.
When he does the Nooo and starts crushing droids etc. he is trying to kill Palpatine but he just doesn't have the power anymore
I view it as a fluke that was only able to come about due to the time crunch.
Considering the prequels and ROTJ exist in their current forms, I disagree with that.
Go watch Logans Run and then watch A New Hope back to back. Feels like there is a decade of taste separating them when there was only one year. Like it or not George helmed a movie no one thought was going to be any good and made pretty well ever good choice you could.
American Graffiti was a really good movie for its time but most people forget he ever made that (got lots of Oscar nominations too, including Picture, Director and Writer)
I think Lucas just got burned out in a major way on Star Wars and it affected everything about his process going forward. I sometimes wonder about the world where Lucas directed 3-4 movies between the OT and prequels instead of not sitting in that chair between 1977 and 1997.
Go watch Logans Run and then watch A New Hope back to back. Feels like there is a decade of taste separating them when there was only one year. Like it or not George helmed a movie no one thought was going to be any good and made pretty well ever good choice you could.
Except, George didn't make every choice, and early cuts of the film prompted lukewarm responses.
Just read the production section on this page. If you feel more daring (or like annoying BobbyRoberts), read this.
Lucas benefited greatly from collaboration with people such as Paul Hirsch and his ex-wife, Marcia. Attributing everything good solely to George is simply inaccurate. That's not to say George doesn't deserve any credit, of course.
George had the ideas and framework, and he was the director, but other people helped put SW together. Hell, Ralph McQuarrie doesn't get nearly enough love. I'd argue it was more his imagination than Lucas' that set the visual tone for the OT.
I'm quoting all this because people need to read those links and learn how much so many people contributed to Star Wars.
If we solely got what Lucas wanted, you can bet there would be no franchise.
Whyyyy youuuuuuu...
Nah, there's a lot of good information in there - it's just presented kinda skewed. So long as you know that going in, it's all good.
I wouldn't say people SHOULDN'T read "Easy Riders, Raging Bulls," but I would make sure they knew it wasn't exactly all that journalistic, too![]()
Do we really need to have another discussion about whether George Lucas is the best or worst thing ever to happen to Star Wars?
Except that Luke was a 65 year old man instead of a little kid, and he was accompanied by a cartoon frog instead of a cartoon rabbit.I haven't read it but supposedly the first draft for Star Wars was a lot like the prequels.
Do we really need to have another discussion about whether George Lucas is the best or worst thing ever to happen to Star Wars?
Yes. I mean, what else are people supposed to talk about?
Let's make more fan-fiction theories about this cast instead!
Sorry, I guess I'm just sort of tired of this "everything good about the OT movies was through collaboration" meme. As somebody who dabbles in film-making It's like nobody realizes this happens to nearly every great film (and yet we still largely attribute it to those directors on other films); it's just better documented with Star Wars because of its cultural status. It's not insightful, it just sounds like somebody regurgitating Plinkett's SW critiques.
(That being said, I give a shout-out to the Secret History of Star Wars book. Great read about the creative process.)
I hated how that one guy in the board room of the Death Stay told vader "Don't try to frighten us with your sorcerer's ways, Lord Vader. Your sad devotion to that ancient Jedi religion has not helped you conjure up the stolen data tapes, or given you enough clairvoyance to find the rebels' hidden fortress..."
The jedi have ONLY been gone for 20 years, and that makes it sounds like its been several generations. This guy was old enough he probably saw vids of the clone wars and the jedi in action.
Sorry, I guess I'm just sort of tired of this "everything good about the OT movies was through collaboration" meme. As somebody who dabbles in film-making It's like nobody realizes this happens to nearly every great film (and yet we still largely attribute it to those directors on other films); it's just better documented with Star Wars because of its cultural status. It's not insightful, it just sounds like somebody regurgitating Plinkett's SW critiques.
It's not insightful, it just sounds like somebody regurgitating Plinkett's SW critiques.
Which is super fucking annoying all on its lonesome. I'm all for criticism and I have problems with the movies, but I think there's a difference between criticism and obsessive, repetitive negativity. I'd rather just focus on what's ahead. But people can talk about whatever they want. I just don't personally care for the politics behind the creation of the movies. I mean, I find it interesting to some extent, but not really for the purpose of further bashing.
I suppose these posts were directed at me so I'll take the bait.
Plinkett might have made some people interested in the production behind SW, but not everyone discussing it is basing their claims solely on those reviews. Some people were interested in and read about the films' production long before Plinkett came along.
It's not about determining whether Lucas was the best or worst thing. Clearly the series doesn't exist without him, but it's simply balancing out the idea that Lucas made every decision on the original films. Like you said it's true of any film, but SW is the one in which the discussion arises most because of the sheer popularity as well as success of Lucas. I even said that the collaborative nature was true of any film or artistic endeavor.
Yikes. I did my best to write my post without any bashing or over the top negativity. I thought the poster to which I originally responded might be genuinely interested in reading more about the production.
No worries, I wasn't really directing it at you; you did your research. I realize that not everybody is stealing from Plinkett, but the parroting of his talking points has become really prevalent in the last 4-5 years.
My rant was more a general thought I've had in regards to SW topics lately, where stories tend to strip Lucas of any agency/credit for his work on the OT (undeservedly), while attributing all crap to him for the prequels (deservedly). I apologize if you feel like you were singled out: you qualified your statements well enough.
I hated how that one guy in the board room of the Death Stay told vader "Don't try to frighten us with your sorcerer's ways, Lord Vader. Your sad devotion to that ancient Jedi religion has not helped you conjure up the stolen data tapes, or given you enough clairvoyance to find the rebels' hidden fortress..."
The jedi have ONLY been gone for 20 years, and that makes it sounds like its been several generations. This guy was old enough he probably saw vids of the clone wars and the jedi in action.
Nice John Boyega interview.
Yes...I'm tickled pink that John is possibly a lead in what may eventually be the largest revenue generating movie ever.
I know. Skin color shouldn't matter.
I've watched television and movies for over 40 years. My top 25 characters in a book, comic, film or tv show...none of them are black. Little things like a black man being a potential lead in a potential BILLION dollar revenue film...Star Wars...makes me happy.
Good job Disney.
You're not alone.I'm also a crazy person who mostly enjoys the prequels. So feel free to give me crap.![]()
Yeah, skin color should be a non-issue as far as who to pick for a role and how well it's performed. But having a personal affinity towards a black lead is perfectly understandable. I'm sure a lot of people actually feel the same way. I haven't seen Attack the Block yet, but from the .gifs and wiki's summary, it seems like I probably should. I really hope he is a Jedi.Nice John Boyega interview.
Yes...I'm tickled pink that John is possibly a lead in what may eventually be the largest revenue generating movie ever.
I know. Skin color shouldn't matter.
I've watched television and movies for over 40 years. My top 25 characters in a book, comic, film or tv show...none of them are black. Little things like a black man being a potential lead in a potential BILLION dollar revenue film...Star Wars...makes me happy.
Good job Disney.
Yikes. I did my best to write my post without any bashing or over the top negativity. I thought the poster to which I originally responded might be genuinely interested in reading more about the production. It wasn't intended as a "let's all bash Lucas" derailment.
This thread moves pretty fast, so I have no idea if this has already been posted, but here's an interesting article that elucidates some of the casting process. Apparently it took place over 9 months and Dev Patel failed to win a part as recently as 3 weeks ago:
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/star-wars-vii-cast-how-699964?mobile_redirect=false
Mara Jade hype levels rising.So there is one more major female lead role to be cast then?
So there is one more major female lead role to be cast then?
Please, be a woman of color.
Yeah, the role that Lupita N'yongo read for, the role that seems to be going to Maisie Richardson-Sellers, is still to be announced.
Hollywood Reporter seems to think she's a Kenobi somehow.
I like him. So he is supposed to be the lead? A jedi?