• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Star Wars Episode VII Thread of Opinion and Speculation

Status
Not open for further replies.
Can't say where I heard this from, but Max Von Sydow might not be playing what we suspect.

Sources suggest he might play a merchant who deals in "death-water" or beers, liquors and such. An evil brewmiester who controls his own army of brainwashed stormtroopers is a possibility.

Maybe he's just this guy, but older.

sleazebaggato.jpg
 
Huge wall o' text courtesy of Mandrake.

Credit where it's due, some serious thought and effort put into this.

My non-serious answer - writers should base the entire plot on a single round of the Star Wars LCG. Would end up with an interesting story of how an Imperial Star Destroyer was single handedly taken down by Yoda who only moments before distracted a rancor using the force (promptly to be destroyed by some random force lightning).
 
^ I definitely think it will be a great movie.

I would love to see Liam Neeson ghost, but I don't think it makes much sense to do it. An Anakin ghost could be used for a good dramatic moment though.
 
Seems like Abrams has the eye for balancing nostalgia, storytelling, and spectacle. I think he and his team will pull it off.

I'm thinking that Oscar Isaac will be some kind of political antagonist.
 
I don't think Luke will be leading an academy. I think he will have left everyone, living remotely like Obi and Yoda, but for other reasons, something like how the dark side affected him and he feels like the world can and should go on without jedis or siths, so he can be at peace.

But now he will have to pass on what he learned to an apprentice, because a new threat has arisen.

Not to mention the whole parallels setting up a subtle theme of "this has already happened" making it familiar to old fans but putting a twist on things.

Having Luke embrace Tattooine given his introduction would also show some growth in character.

I agree that a new threat will bring him out of retirement and serve for his overall arc.. setting up a new way to combat the rising threat, ultimately culminating in his death ala Obi Wan. And like Obi Wan, continuing to help from beyond.
 
Not to mention the whole parallels setting up a subtle theme of "this has already happened" making it familiar to old fans but putting a twist on things.

Having Luke embrace Tattooine given his introduction would also show some growth in character.

I agree that a new threat will bring him out of retirement and serve for his overall arc.. setting up a new way to combat the rising threat, ultimately culminating in his death ala Obi Wan. And like Obi Wan, continuing to help from beyond.

I actually hope they don't do that. Putting Luke through pretty much the exact same Obi-Wan arc would be kind of lame, in my opinion.
 
I said it in the other thread so I'll say it here.

Han is going to die, first movie likely, second at most.

He wanted Han to die before and probably only coming back to put this to rest once and for all .

Plus it can add some weight to what the movies are about.
 
I predict the movie will actually be pretty good, lots of comparisons to the OT and most people and fans will be happy.

At the same time, I hope they don't get too caught up in trying to "not be bad", like, they could end up with a movie that is good by all accounts but not exactly spectacular or iconic like Star Wars has tended to be.
 
Seems like Abrams has the eye for balancing nostalgia, storytelling, and spectacle. I think he and his team will pull it off.

I'm thinking that Oscar Isaac will be some kind of political antagonist.
It would be really awesome if they inject a ton of political intrigue and maneuvring into the film. I want it to explore not just some new conflict, but how the factions of the various planets of the galaxy are positioning themselves.
 
It would be really awesome if they inject a ton of political intrigue and maneuvring into the film. I want it to explore not just some new conflict, but how the factions of the various planets of the galaxy are positioning themselves.

I would also really enjoy this but all of the OT diehard purists will come out whining about how "buh buh buh simple good vs evil story the politics in the PT were boring ABRAAAAAMS!!!"
 
The political intrigue could be good if they do it right, which the prequels didn't. I think they're going to stay away from heavy galactic politics though thanks to the PT.
 
It would be really awesome if they inject a ton of political intrigue and maneuvring into the film. I want it to explore not just some new conflict, but how the factions of the various planets of the galaxy are positioning themselves.

Yea, exactly - factions. That would be really interesting to see, although I'm not sure if there should still be such division. It all depends on how the new canon handles the Empire after ROTJ.
 
I would also really enjoy this but all of the OT diehard purists will come out whining about how "buh buh buh simple good vs evil story the politics in the PT were boring ABRAAAAAMS!!!"

yeah but I feel like the hardest of core of OT purists are going to hate the film anyway, no matter what.
 
The whole bringing balance to the Force thing as I took it was a "prophecy" that the Jedi believed in during the prequels, but even they questioned that themselves in Episode III.

Anakin's character arc is completed regardless. The story was about family, not Anakin being the godsend of the universe. His final words were "you were right about me, tell your sister you were right..." not "fuck yeah I saved the entire galaxy forever!"

It's never mentioned in the originals because it's not really a thing. One thing about the prequels I wish Lucas would have detailed was where exactly that prophecy came from. In the end it ended up being sort of true, but it didn't bring balance to the Force. I don't see how balance could ever be brought to the Force. That's like asking the planet earth for world peace. It's never going to happen.

We may not agree on everything, but you're dead on about Vaderkin's redemption. It was never about any stupid prophecy or "bringing balance" (side note : how did the Jedi think "balance" would be a good thing, when they were living in a world with hundreds or thousands of Jedi and only two Sith? Isn't it obvious in that situation that balance would be a bad thing for the Jedi?) to the Force, it was about a man who succumbed to his own desire for power ultimately being redeemed by the love of his only son, and that's so much more powerful.
 
Yea not necessarily that we need a bunch of senators, but that it would be nice to see various factions that are sort of together but they don't completely see eye to eye on things. There's a lot of different peoples out there like the hutts and maybe some splinter groups or having to work with unscrupulous folk, etc. On top of this you can stick their representatives/generals/etc all working for their own gains which may or may not be to the benefit of others depending on what's happening. Don't make it like super in your face, just use it to add some dynamics and some twists so its not just good vs evil.

I feel that these are exactly the kinds of issues that would pop up when a great power crumbles. People have to work together against some new common threat, but there is the allure of power for themselves in the wake of the Empire's collapse.
 
I would also really enjoy this but all of the OT diehard purists will come out whining about how "buh buh buh simple good vs evil story the politics in the PT were boring ABRAAAAAMS!!!"

The political intrigue could be good if they do it right, which the prequels didn't. I think they're going to stay away from heavy galactic politics though thanks to the PT.

Yea, exactly - factions. That would be really interesting to see, although I'm not sure if there should still be such division. It all depends on how the new canon handles the Empire after ROTJ.

Full Disclosure : I'm one of the "purists" (not the word I'd use to describe myself but I think I fit the mold you're talking about) who will probably find something to be disappointed by no matter how good the sequels are.

I think political intrigue on a galactic level can be done well and be interesting. I think we can agree that the prequels didn't handle it well.

I, personally, doubt whether that's the approach that would work for Star Wars. One of the things that worked about the OT was that it had a very simple delineation - the Empire is bad, and everyone fighting the Empire is good. It's not realistic, and it doesn't take a lot of things into account (like Luke submitted applications to the Imperial academy, are we to assume that if he'd been accepted that he'd automatically be evil? Isn't it likely there are other good people out there joining the military simply because they need the work? Like a lot of people in real life?), but they commit to it and are consistent and it worked.

The fact that it worked had a lot to do with the writing, the charisma of the cast, and the fact that they didn't try to show us a lot of political intrigue. We got a throwaway line about the senate being dissolved and that was really it.

Separate factions and the political fallout of the battle of Endor are incredibly interesting and have so much potential, but I don't think they should be the focus of the movie. We need a clear threat and a clear underdog to root for. The big if that all of this hinges on is whether or not JJ is going to try and make a trilogy that feels like the OT, or if he's going to try and make a new style of movie that lives in the same universe. Either way could lead to a good movie, but me personally, I want more of the Star Wars I loved as a kid - broad strokes, big themes, heroism - I want a romanticized version of conflict, I want a space opera.
 
Separate factions and the political fallout of the battle of Endor are incredibly interesting and have so much potential, but I don't think they should be the focus of the movie. We need a clear threat and a clear underdog to root for. The big if that all of this hinges on is whether or not JJ is going to try and make a trilogy that feels like the OT, or if he's going to try and make a new style of movie that lives in the same universe. Either way could lead to a good movie, but me personally, I want more of the Star Wars I loved as a kid - broad strokes, big themes, heroism - I want a romanticized version of conflict, I want a space opera.

I pretty much agree with everything you've said. It could serve as an interesting backdrop for whatever personal conflict our main characters will face, but it shouldn't be a focus. That was a big problem with the prequels - no clear protagonist (Obi-Wan was close), no underdog for whom to root. A jumbled mess of half-baked ideas.

But I figure the new EU will explore the political fallout after Endor, and we might as well have a New Rebublic set for Episode VII. Still, I like the idea of one of the characters being a political figure who maybe challenges the establishment. That could give Leia something to do.
 
You guys can rest easy. There is no way 7, 8 and 9 will be worse than the prequels. Seriously think about and watch Episode II to refresh yourselves.

[Edit: Although, Episode 3 is different in my opinion. It barely hit the quality bar and was the best of the prequels. Lucas indeed got better and that is expected when you go from not making movies to making multiple after such a long hiatus.]
 
For me? Well, a good movie, for one thing. After watching the bulk of the director's past projects, I only think he's an "okay" filmmaker. Not bad, nor good. Just "okay". Outside from that, I'm keeping my expectations at a minimum, as I don't want to be upset with how the film might turnout.

As much as I like A New Hope, The Empire Strikes Back, & Return of the Jedi, I had fallen in love with Star Wars when it had gone away from referencing the original trilogy (Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic) or when it's being handled by a different team that are taking their own spin on the mythos (Genndy Tartakovsky's Clone Wars mini series.)
 
I heard a rumour that Boyega would play Luke's adopted son, Lukakin
Not this again, haha.

Honestly, as much as I hope Boyega is a jedi, I hope Gleeson is also a jedi. Gleeson/Boyega dual protagonist role would be amazing, kind of similar to Obi-wan/Anakin's relationship in the first half of Episode III. Or during the entirety of The Clone Wars cartoon, I guess.

I'm also an advocate for small scale politics. The OT had them to an extent, mostly centered around Empire vs. Rebellion issues. If Kasdan riffs of of that and makes the new trilogy have some New Jedi/Republic vs. Imperial Remnants/Sympathizers, I think it can be interesting.
 
I wonder if they'll drop the sith idea of only one master and one apprentice, bit daft.

I fucking hope not. The Rule of Two is like one of the coolest thing about the siths. Only two members of a whole millenia old order, all knowledge and power concentrated in two beings. One master and one apprentice. One to embody power, the other to crave it.

That is like one of the coolest philosophies I have ever read about, I was in awe of it when I read it the first time, and I still am. And it's pretty original afaik. If there were suddenly like dozens of siths that'd be pretty lame. Though now that both are dead I do wonder what will happen.
 
with the empire dead and replaced by an incompetent bureaucracy, it'll basically be the thick of it in space.
 
I want jedi to be OP as fuck in this new trilogy. Bring on the crazy CGI effects.

Please no. In the original trilogy, if a Jedi did something, you felt like they were doing something really great and fantastic. Yoda lifting Luke's X-wing out of the swamp was a hugely impactful moment, and showed the awesome power that he held inside of him.

Prequel trilogy? Everyone was flipping around, throw stuff, jumping off of or onto stuff, basically looking and acting like cartoons. There was nothing impressive about it anymore, because there was no reason to believe that Jedi or Sith couldn't just do anything they wanted. They were video game characters.

Give meaning again to what the Jedi can do. Their expressions of power should be rare, but when they happen, awe-inducing.
 
Until we get a trailer, it's all fanfiction at this point.
I suppose so. But what's wrong with a little theorizing? There are plenty of ways that this movie can play out, and it's always interesting to see what other fans want to/think will happen. I noticed a lot of people don't want to see OP Jedi, which surprises me. I always thought the crazy flips and force powers were one of the best parts of the PT. Plus, we can always come back to threads like these after a trailer or the movie itself is released and see how close we were to being right. Or how wrong we were.
 
Hoping for at least one of those really broad synopses on Sunday. You know those ones that spend half the time talking about actors rather than plot.

Please no. In the original trilogy, if a Jedi did something, you felt like they were doing something really great and fantastic. Yoda lifting Luke's X-wing out of the swamp was a hugely impactful moment, and showed the awesome power that he held inside of him.

Prequel trilogy? Everyone was flipping around, throw stuff, jumping off of or onto stuff, basically looking and acting like cartoons. There was nothing impressive about it anymore, because there was no reason to believe that Jedi or Sith couldn't just do anything they wanted. They were video game characters.

Give meaning again to what the Jedi can do. Their expressions of power should be rare, but when they happen, awe-inducing.
This guy gets it.
 
I don't think Luke will be leading an academy. I think he will have left everyone, living remotely like Obi and Yoda, but for other reasons, something like how the dark side affected him and he feels like the world can and should go on without jedis or siths, so he can be at peace.

But now he will have to pass on what he learned to an apprentice, because a new threat has arisen.

I think this will be done because otherwise he would need a wife and probably some kids, which would be too much ground to cover or to not cover. So making him a hermit is more appropriate, it allows us to pretty much see Luke right where we last saw him, at peace, but with nothing missed in all those years. Han and Leia though will obviously be a different story, but you can't damage the icon that Luke is by having anything having happened significantly since the original trilogy. In that scenario Luke would be the embodiment of a direct link to the original trilogy, which is exactly what is needed for the series. He's basically a figure of purity at the end of RotJ, you can't really change him, other than having him in a sort of peaceful symbolically-cryogenic state.

It's like why at the end of The Matrix trilogy, Neo is taken away. Same reasoning. Same reason Jesus goes to heaven. You can't change the hero, he has to remain who he is until he is called upon again.

Luke went through a lot in the first 3 movies. I am sure he has questioned everything.

Its crazy.
 
The new Jedi Academy will be on Tatooine because it is too dangerous to keep it close to corrupt power figures in Coruscant, and because of the Skywalker connection, and because the New Republic wants to stabilize the once Hutt-slave infested region.

The Force will be more mystical and rare like the OT.

C3P0 and R2D2 become the main characters. C3P0 cries after Solo sacrifices himself for the greater good
 
I find it unlikely that Luke would go into exile after ROTJ. He becomes a Jedi, then heads to Tatooine to live in a hut and doesn't even attempt to pass on the Jedi philosophy. Seems like a waste.
 
I fucking hope not. The Rule of Two is like one of the coolest thing about the siths. Only two members of a whole millenia old order, all knowledge and power concentrated in two beings. One master and one apprentice. One to embody power, the other to crave it.

That is like one of the coolest philosophies I have ever read about, I was in awe of it when I read it the first time, and I still am. And it's pretty original afaik. If there were suddenly like dozens of siths that'd be pretty lame. Though now that both are dead I do wonder what will happen.

The big flaw with the Rule of Two is that if both Sith die at the same time the entire legacy is over right then and there.

It's unlikely that a new Sith would follow it unless they came across teachings of old Sith Lords who did, but even then the new Sith could decide not to because it "failed" in the end.
 
I could conceivably see all of the new people as Jedi-in-training. Mysterious stuff happens, then towards the end of the movie, we see Mr. Driver taking advice / orders from someone, who when shown, ends up being a red-outlined Palpatine ghost.
 
Can't say where I heard this from, but Max Von Sydow might not be playing what we suspect.

Sources suggest he might play a merchant who deals in "death-water" or beers, liquors and such. An evil brewmiester who controls his own army of brainwashed stormtroopers is a possibility.

Is that so Abrams can reuse the brewery as a set again?
That sounds disappointing if true.
Sydow basically can't be a Sith that is for sure (he would have been like 50 during the era of Palpatine), but he would make a great Ex-Imperial power figure/Industrialist/Grand Moff
 
star-wars-episode-7-title-revealed-744f8052-a6cc-4b2d-bae2-ea451e02cef2.jpeg


Seen in my facebook feed. Anyone know if it's real?

Why would it be? The name is drab and boring, exactly the opposite of real Star Wars names; and it was found on Facebook, the same place where you learn Jeff Goldblum and Bill Cosby died and the moon landing was obviously a hoax.
 
I could conceivably see all of the new people as Jedi-in-training. Mysterious stuff happens, then towards the end of the movie, we see Mr. Driver taking advice / orders from someone, who when shown, ends up being a red-outlined Palpatine ghost.

With the EU gone and the revelations from the Clone Wars cartoon there might not be any such thing as actual Sith ghosts now.

Darth Bane showed up as an illusion as part of Yoda's test to become a force ghost himself, he said that Sith do not believe in and reject any sort of afterlife.
 
Please no. In the original trilogy, if a Jedi did something, you felt like they were doing something really great and fantastic. Yoda lifting Luke's X-wing out of the swamp was a hugely impactful moment, and showed the awesome power that he held inside of him.

Prequel trilogy? Everyone was flipping around, throw stuff, jumping off of or onto stuff, basically looking and acting like cartoons. There was nothing impressive about it anymore, because there was no reason to believe that Jedi or Sith couldn't just do anything they wanted. They were video game characters.

Give meaning again to what the Jedi can do. Their expressions of power should be rare, but when they happen, awe-inducing.

Say what you will about the non lightsaber action, but the Saber duels in the prequel series are a million times better than the dull sword flipping in the original trilogy.

And for the record, the lightsaber duels would be horse shit without the flipping. I would not enjoy this franchise if all the duels were like Obi Wan vs Vader in A New Hope. At the minimum I want Vader vs Luke in Empire, but at the same time, the prequel trilogy (specifically Quigon and Obi wan vs Maul and Obi wan vs Anakin) are some of the most entertaining fights in cinema. (note, when I say entertaining, this doesn't necessarily equate to good/fantastic/whatever)

Also, doesn't your last sentence contradict the entirety of the second paragraph? You complain about the over the top nature during the fight sequences, and then you ask for them to be able to produce that rare but awe inducing moment of power? What is more awe inducing than a well orchestrated ballet of swords? Do you prefer Obi wan standing stil in a sword fight and Yoda straining himself to lift an Xwing out of the bog? None of those moments are "awe inducing" to me.
 
I just hope JJ kind of reigns it in for this one and isn't still in Star Trek mode. I watched Into Darkness knowing he would do SW next, and it left me with a bad feeling. I can only hope that it'll be okay because he doesn't take the Trek legacy nearly as seriously as SW, that the script was wholly to blame for the disposable action movie tone, and that Kasdan knows exactly where to continue this story.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom