• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Street Fighter IV PC Benchmark is out!!! Come post your superior framerates!!

gifife said:
2aie96o.jpg

edit:
FPS: on
Anti aliasing : off
Full screen : on
Display : 1440x900
Refresh: 75
Vsync: off
Frame rate: fixed
Aspect: 16:10
Bright:100
Parallel : on
Texture filtering: 4x
Model Quality: Mid
Background: high
Soft shadow: mid
Self shadow: high
Motion blur: low
Particle: low
Extra touch: posterization
Seems the particles make all the difference. This is amazing performance for a 8600.
 
Darklord said:
B?? By the looks of everyone else's benchmark shouldn't it be better? :(
Evilore got 12 more fps than you but his CPU and GPU are overclocked. Is yours an old 260 or a new 216 core, and what do you have it clocked at. I can't imagine an overclock accounting for a 12fps difference though. Check your Nvidia control panel to see if anything is enabled that shouldn't be like Ambient Occlusion.
 
SCORE: 8825
AVERAGE: 58.56FPS
OS: Windows XP Professional
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+
Memory: 3070MB
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
Display Setting: 1440x900 75Hz
2qbgch5.jpg

FPS: on
Anti aliasing : off
Full screen : on
Display : 1440x900
Refresh: 75
Vsync: off
Frame rate: fixed
Aspect: 16:10
Bright:100
Parallel : on
*Texture filtering: 16x
Model Quality: Mid
Background: high
*Soft shadow: high
*Self shadow: highest
*Motion blur: high
*Particle: high
*Extra touch: none

test 2 upped some settings * differences from last test *
 
SCORE: 9644
AVERAGE: 59.23FPS
OS: Windows XP Professional
CPU: Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 165 (2.7ghz)
Memory: 2048MB
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Display Setting: 1440x900 60Hz
15ntyth.jpg
 
23 mins to download a benchmark? *yawn*

*downloads and takes a nap*

Although, I'm not sure I'll get the PC version when the PS3 version is just sitting there.
 
SCORE: 5884
AVERAGE: 59.29FPS
OS: Windows Vista(TM) Home Premium
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz
Memory: 6134MB
Graphics Card: ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
Display Setting: 1920x1200 60Hz 8xAA

(c)CAPCOM U.S.A., INC. 2008, 2009 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.



How do you guys get 16xAA and 100+fps?
 
SCORE: 6236
AVERAGE: 59.80FPS
OS: Windows Vista(TM) Home Premium
CPU: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 940 Processor
Memory: 3326MB
Graphics Card: ATI Radeon HD 4870
Display Setting: 1280x1024 60Hz 8xAA



Here's a strange thing. I turned off the v-sync and the game was like running x10 its speed. Crazy. But everything I put at max setting.
 
Ok this is kind of neat. SF4 will occupy a 4:3 screen at 1280x1024(can check on the monitor) but render the game in 1280x720 16:9 letterbox.
 
So here we go (mind you I need to RMA my card since one of my cores is dead,so this is single core perf)

So with these settings

Settings1.jpg

Settings2.jpg


We get:

8xAAresult.jpg


And without any AA we get:

NoAAresult.jpg



the fights all run at an average of 120, the overall average goes down because when the multicharacter spin scene first loads up there's a 1 second dip to like 45fps for whatever reason and it fucks with the overall average.



I'm running this on the same display I have my 360&PS3 hooked up to and hooooooooly fuck the 1080p difference can't be overstated, even without AA the game looks so fucking crisp, my flatmate picked up the 360 version so I've played it enough on this same set that the shit just blew my mind.

Every console game NEEDS a PC port, seriously, madness.
 
Ken Masters said:
if you buy this on PC, can you put this game on a PC and a laptop?
It depends on the DRM that is used for the retail game. Most likely you can.

Shadow780 said:
I still get 8x max, everything else is on high BTW.
You have an ATI card and you can only enable the higher ones with Nvidia cards. Don't worry 8xMSAA which is what you are getting is still amazing. I want to see what you get when you turn off V-Sync though.
 
Rorschach said:
23 mins to download a benchmark? *yawn*

*downloads and takes a nap*

Although, I'm not sure I'll get the PC version when the PS3 version is just sitting there.

Took me about 23 seconds from that link in the OP
 
"I still get 8x max, everything else is on high BTW."


I was mainly talking about the FPS. I think the AA options vary between ATi and nvidia cards. You could potentially force it in the driver panel.
 
Thanks, here's V-sync off:

SCORE: 10429
AVERAGE: 150.85FPS
OS: Windows Vista(TM) Home Premium
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz
Memory: 6134MB
Graphics Card: ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
Display Setting: 1920x1200 60Hz 8xAA


Everything else maxed.
 
zbarron said:
Evilore got 12 more fps than you but his CPU and GPU are overclocked. Is yours an old 260 or a new 216 core, and what do you have it clocked at. I can't imagine an overclock accounting for a 12fps difference though. Check your Nvidia control panel to see if anything is enabled that shouldn't be like Ambient Occlusion.

It's a 216 core but I haven't overclocked it or the CPU. I tested it again and it seems to be around 70fps in the fighting but then the last part where all the characters in a circle it drops to around 40fps.

Where can I find Ambient Occlusion in the control panel do you know? I'll check if it's on.

I tested it with C16xAA rather than C16xQAA and got a much higher performance and an A rank.

SCORE: 6480
AVERAGE: 65.63FPS
OS: Windows Vista(TM) Home Premium
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz
Memory: 6140MB
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
Display Setting: 1920x1080 60Hz C16xAA


Edit: Also Evillore has 12gb to my 6gb. That would explain the better performance I'm guessing.
 
Darklord said:
It's a 216 core but I haven't overclocked it or the CPU. I tested it again and it seems to be around 70fps in the fighting but then the last part where all the characters in a circle it drops to around 40fps.

Where can I find Ambient Occlusion in the control panel do you know? I'll check if it's on.

I tested it with C16xAA rather than C16xQAA and got a much higher performance and an A rank.

SCORE: 6480
AVERAGE: 65.63FPS
OS: Windows Vista(TM) Home Premium
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz
Memory: 6140MB
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
Display Setting: 1920x1080 60Hz C16xAA


Edit: Also Evillore has 12gb to my 6gb. That would explain the better performance I'm guessing.
The overclocking would have an importance in the framerate. Ambient Occlusion is the top feature under "manage 3d settings." It's only available with the latest drivers so if it isn't there, don't sweat it. The 12GB shouldn't make any difference since this game probably uses less than 2GB. It's nice to have for serious multitasking and many non-gaming programs but unfortunately games just aren't really using more than 2GB of RAM and probably won't for a very long time seeing how most people are running 32-bit OS's.
 
zbarron said:
The overclocking would have an importance in the framerate. Ambient Occlusion is the top feature under "manage 3d settings." It's only available with the latest drivers so if it isn't there, don't sweat it. The 12GB shouldn't make any difference since this game probably uses less than 2GB. It's nice to have for serious multitasking and many non-gaming programs but unfortunately games just aren't really using more than 2GB of RAM and probably won't for a very long time seeing how most people are running 32-bit OS's.

Ah ok. Well I checked and it's not there. I thought I had the latest drivers...

EviLore said:
Are your drivers current?

I thought I did. Maybe I'll update my video drivers and see how it goes.
 
SCORE: 10207
AVERAGE: 63.75FPS
OS: Windows XP Professional
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4600 @ 2.40GHz
Memory: 2046MB
Graphics Card: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series
Display Setting: 1280x720 85Hz

I need to upgrade this CPU if I want to to up settings higher. I left it one default outside of particles and refresh rate.
 
Shadow780 said:
So it's better to have V-sync off?

For benchmarking you generally want vsync off so that you can see your true performance stats. For gaming vsync + triple buffering will be the way to go unless you're oblivious to screen tearing.
 
EGM92 said:
You'll get higher frames with it off, but it's not really playable. I can't imagine playing it at 280fps.
That might just be the benchmark which is probably just like a real time video. I'm sure the full playable game will let you play it things beyond 60fps without it speeding it up.

By the way, I beat your score. I just needed to "tweak" the settings a bit.
25isz2q.png
 
EGM92 said:
You'll get higher frames with it off, but it's not really playable. I can't imagine playing it at 280fps.


SuperEnemyCrab said:
for benchmarking ya, otherwise your locked at your monitors refresh rate. You may want to turn it on when actually playing the game to avoid tearing, depending...


EviLore said:
For benchmarking you generally want vsync off so that you can see your true performance stats. For gaming vsync + triple buffering will be the way to go unless you're oblivious to screen tearing.


I see, thanks.
 
The model quality thing seems to only add shaders to the fighters, doesn't up the polys of them. So you cant see the extra touch without model quality on high.
 
Seems like an awesome port so far, as expected. I get something like 80fps average with everything maxed at 1280x1024.

yes i still have a huge fat radioactive CRT.

Definitive version up in here.

Anyone go the Wii route and set it to minimum? You can completely turn off the backgrounds. :lol
 
Even though I'm pretty sure the answer is going to be a resounding ":lol :lol :lol NO! :lol " I figured I'd ask anyway:

Would this game run on a (white plastic) MacBook from 2008? ^_^;
 
I get an 80 average at everything cranked with mine, not too shabby:

E8400 Core 2 Duo @ 3ghz
4gigs of ram (on 32 bit though so It cant see it all =/)
8800 GTX
 
Ye, I tried to set it at 640x480 everything maxed, still runs shitty with the model quality on high, and the 2x anti aliasing kills it even more, get around 30fps like that :(
At medium model quality the fighters look more shiny and plastic like, but still very playable.
 
Top Bottom