Ugh.. Well it was nice knowing ya.
I thought for sure this would hit 60fps though, the whole style of it screams 60fps :/
I'm sure it will still be fun but... Grinding on rails then shooting or both St the same time, at 60fps would have felt great
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Sunset Overdrive runs at 30 fps/900p
- Thread starter chicagocubsfan
- Start date
- Status
I thought for sure this would hit 60fps though, the whole style of it screams 60fps :/
I'm sure it will still be fun but... Grinding on rails then shooting or both St the same time, at 60fps would have felt great
Head.spawn
Junior Member
vpance
Member
PS4 is fine, given that it can do Uncharted 4 level graphics at 1080p60. Bone on the other hand will not likely be able to reach such heights, ever.
It's not a matter of how much it sold over all but what it sold on x1
What would the resolution have to drop to in order to get 60fps? Anyone smart like that?
Number look good/bad on paper. In the end what matters is what i see on my flat screen when i play.
The only thing i don't like about the game is the character moves too slow. Even when gringind all over the place looks like he's moving in slow motion.
Is there a demo planned for this?
The only thing i don't like about the game is the character moves too slow. Even when gringind all over the place looks like he's moving in slow motion.
Is there a demo planned for this?
Let's wait until the games release before we declare what they are. Companies aren't above misleading in pre-release concept trailers - even first party companies. Even the companies you cite as the example.
BabyFaceKillah
Member
Deuces
so you played the game??
OT: i thought this was known??? actually didnt they say that instead using the boost to up the resolution they used it to add more effects??
guess i shouldn't be surprised at how big this thread got, i wonder how long till it becomes a graveyard.
Yeah i'm sure a 500$ ps4 would have bombed horribly, cause nobody buys for that price.
You should tell that all these people outside the u.s. who already pay >500$.
B_Boss
Member
The thing is, I can seriously imagine the PS4 version (if it were to exist) to definitely hit 900p/60fps especially if BF4 can...sure SO and BF4 are different games but BF4 is quite advanced with its implemented elements and MP gameplay. I can't say for sure that SO doesn't have as much going on but I imagine if anything, it is at the very least about as much if not a little less.
Damn....I want this on PS4 bad as hell lol.
Damn....I want this on PS4 bad as hell lol.
kahboomkin
Member
Heh, honestly this doesn't even bother me anymore.
As long as the game is fun and that framerate is locked, I'll be happy.
As long as the game is fun and that framerate is locked, I'll be happy.
vpance
Member
If any dev can live up to expectations, it's ND. So yeah, I believe it. Lol at people thinking what we've seen so far in the last year is the tops for PS4.
Port begging is a bannable offense, fyi.
Naughty Dog isn't above lying to you, either. But sure, keep on keeping on.
BabyFaceKillah
Member
nobody is thinking this.
No one knows since I guess everyone involved is embarrassed or something.
While Ubisoft and Activision just laugh to the bank and announcing their slam dunks for WD/Destiny.
Anyway, what were people expectation from SO or X1 games anyway? It has been nearly a year guys...stop raising your expectation. The standard is there for a reason.
If you said SO is running at 1080/30, then yeah, that would be shocking.
It is funny to see people not buying the game because it isn't 1080...I mean why? The game is exclusively for the X1, isn't that the whole point in buying a console? For the exclusive games right?
I guess people want to buy another year of COD installment instead.
vpance
Member
7 billion people on this planet. Some people out there definitely are thinking this, let me lol at them, ok?
block tower
Member
my point wasnt about comparing features, it was that the average buyer accepts the tablet and smartphone price tag because of how its marketed and sold. the average consumer isnt walking into a store and doing a checklist of what components are in phones and tablets and what it cost to produce the phone or tablet. Sony and MS didnt need to launch a console with an astronomical price but they both couldve launched a system at $475, taken a small loss on the consoles themselves and insured that they would be competent machines.
Tell us more of that Uncharted 4 @ 1080p/60fps game.
We should wait to see UC4 in actual action before using it in any sort of comparison. But i've been happy with my PS4 so far.
All that would have done is raise prices for those people outside the US even more. So what would that prove?
All that would have done is raise prices for those people outside the US even more. So what would that prove?
justsomeguy
Member
Diablo forza horizon and destiny say hi too
vpance
Member
At the end, Drake and Sully fuse into a superior being, setting up the antagonist for Savage Starlight.
Dude, don't go there.
You are talking about cross-gen and not graphic intensive games.
And really? You are bringing in a racing game for comparison?
What next? Are you going to list sport games too?
No one knows for sure, as EA refused to provide exact sales figures for the game in their financial report. Which is telling in itself. But from what I have gathered, it's now somewhere between 2m to 2.5m on all formats.
For comparison, we know that Destiny grossed $325m in 5 days, which at $60 a game, works out to be 5.4m games sold. It's possible that the PS4 version of Destiny will end up selling more that the combined total for Titanfall.
When Titanfall was released, it was #1 in the US for two months. First month was only on XB1, where is just beat Infamous SS, then next month 360 and PC as well, where is sold most on 360. The PS4 continued to outsell the XB1 in all regions when Titanfall released, so it didn't have the system selling bump MS were hoping. It was bundled with the XB1 as well.
If I've got any of the above completely wrong, I'm sure SalesGAF will jump in a correct me.
Anyway, this is all off-topic, so I'll shut up.
Not sure if anyone is interested, but Insomniac released paper on their method of lighting the scene.
http://www.insomniacgames.com/siggraph-real-time-lighting-via-light-linked-list/
A nice new take on how to have multiple lights.
http://www.insomniacgames.com/siggraph-real-time-lighting-via-light-linked-list/
A nice new take on how to have multiple lights.
Deputy Moonman
Member
And yet in the same breath you say the xbox one has already peaked. Your argument is sound.
BuggeryBugz
Member
This thread is amazing. We have everything from people having already played uncharted 4 to port begging.
Anyway, it has been known for a while that this was the res and it seems to be fine and look great.
Anyway, it has been known for a while that this was the res and it seems to be fine and look great.
The average buyer knows a smartphone is capable of many things aside from being just a phone (internet surfing, social updates, personal organized, portable gaming, etc). To the general public, gaming consoles are just that; devices solely for gaming purposes.
Add the fact that smartphones get a lot more use because they're always with you all the time, you can see why people are willing to pay more. Convenience, not just in terms of portability but also the features available, is key here so you can't just ignore that.
ProvenDeadly
Member
Basically what I learned from this page is U4 is playable and the Xbox has like 2 1080p games (even though a majority are 1080p) Quantum Break is a confirmed 900p. The Xbox has peaked, While the PS4 hasn't even gotten started. Also something about Destiny.
Also Xbone can't handle 1080p without massive compromises.
Typical hardware-resolution thread though.
Also Xbone can't handle 1080p without massive compromises.
Typical hardware-resolution thread though.
This is bullshit. Gaming consoles have been some of the biggest Netflix streaming boxes for televisions for years. The problem is desire to stream and consume content on televisions shrinking, and when a smartphone can play games it overrides the need for a casual consumer to buy a device specifically to do that.
justsomeguy
Member
"xbox cant handle 1080p!"
"yes it can, here's some examples"
"they don't count!!!"
Console warz is serious business 😅
ProvenDeadly
Member
There's a list that shows most Xbox game are 1080p, but those games probably don't count either.
Edit: Here's a good one
http://m.ign.com/wikis/xbox-one/PS4_vs._Xbox_One_Native_Resolutions_and_Framerates
travisbickle
Member
A quick count on the list gives me
20 1080p
20 under 1080p
If we remove TR totally because it's 1080 and 900.
So no it is not the majority or most.
Whereas PS4 is at 43 1080p to 4 under 1080, yet it often gets pulled into discussion about current consoles not hitting 1080?
They don't.
I wouldn't even mention any of those games if I am talking about 1080 comparison between two current consoles.
Heck, I don't even care if they are 900/30 as you can tell from my earlier post about SO/X1.
But to bring inferior products for comparison is like saying preseason games matter. That preseason win against Seattle didn't help the Broncos in a true game.
There is a difference when talking about next-gen graphic, and so-so graphic from the yesterday years.
Not going to argue about Diablo and Destiny.
However Horizon is most certainly a graphically intensive game. Also what does being a racing game have to do with anything?
Depends on screen size and how far you sit from the tv.
Also depends on how sensitive you are to this stuff. I can't tell a 900p game from a 1080p game unless I have two side by side images. Others claim to be able to easily see the difference.
If you think it doesn't seem to matter that much you're probably not that sensitive to it. Which is a good thing because you can enjoy more games without complaining about resolutions!
In countries where TV streaming is available? Yes. Nevermind that many of those were purchases probably intended for gaming first.
Still doesn't diminish the convenience factor.
Depends on screen size and how far you sit from the tv.
Also depends on how sensitive you are to this stuff. I can't tell a 900p game from a 1080p game unless I have two side by side images. Others claim to be able to easily see the difference.
If you think it doesn't seem to matter that much you're probably not that sensitive to it. Which is a good thing because you can enjoy more games without complaining about resolutions!
Makes sense. Seems as if people are more concerned about the frame rate locked. They confirm that yet or that a wait and see thing?
I don't know the distance answer, but it's not just the whole 1080p - 900p = 180p missing type stuff.
But there is alot of pixels missing, that may cause the difference for some... I forget how much.
somebodyelseathome
Banned
Got this quote from an article in the IGN comments. Simply reenforces the idea that it all really comes down to the game-play in the end. Regardless of what system we play on.
"If resolution was so important then the Vita would have killed the 3DS. " - Tendoboy1984
"If resolution was so important then the Vita would have killed the 3DS. " - Tendoboy1984
Middle Earth: Shadow of Mordor is (supposedly) on PS4.
Unless those pixels are going away by turning them into black bars, it means the whole picture needs to be stretched and scaled for a 1080p screen. This makes the game look blurrier.
samurai1226
Member
Titanfall sold over 3 million times, 2 million on xbox one and 1 million combined on pc and 360. So I guess thats an excellent number for a game that was released a half year after the launch of the One
travisbickle
Member
If you work for EA or MS I don't think you were supposed to release that information?
Yeah I shouldn't have used the word missing.
Anyway here is Nib95's post..I couldn't quote it.
ok, I'm bored with this shit....
you know what? WHO CARES?
last generation, THE RULE was that ps3 got the inferior and/or broken ports of practically EVERY SINGLE GAME,
yet a lot of ps3 owners seemed quite happy. no?
this generation, again I have both consoles since day 1, and I still have not seen a broken port like I did on ps3.
but a handful of guys still bang the same drum.
well, keep on banging it, just be sure to notice that what sony has declared to be the most important game for them from fall 'till next year, really has no advantage (gfx or whatever you like) on ps4. (if that means anything to your syllogism)
lets discuss instead about all the games that xbone has that ps4 ...doesnt. (wow, sunset overdrive is one of them! who;d have guessed??!
)bottom line, it makes more sense than this stuff
I can't tell, even killer instinct at 720p looks sharp enougth to me, this is only a big deal done console can do it more regular than the other
travisbickle
Member
Someone posted a list to confirm that "most" game on XB1 are 1080.
The list actually shows a 50:50 split.
The person banging the same drum is the person claiming most titles are 1080p.
Russell_T_Shackelford
Banned
Not that one could tell from the stream, but there was a guy streaming SoM last night on Live from PS that claimed it was 60.
- Status