• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Super Smash Bros Wii U and 3DS Thread 3: Ridley's Believe It or Not!

I'm really not sure what point you're trying to make. Characters shouldn't be included because they don't have distinct silhouettes? That's pretty absurd.

No I'm suggesting most smash fans don't know who these characters are and are going to pick a character based on visuals. A unique silhouette that cannot be confused with the other characters is part of a good visual design.

Having said that the beast man fire emblem character wasn't the best example. The cape can make things confusing.


...

Misty, really?

we're suggesting Misty now?
you know what this means, right
Cynthia for SSB4

Not saying add her as a character, just using her as an example of a character who won't be confused with others in the roster.

People learn about the roster, by playing smash. It supposedly helped FE, and I know people personally who played the earthbound games because their first experience with ness and lucas is smash bros.

You give it to them , they learn about it and begin to care. And those who do care, will care.

Yeah sure I agree, but that point could be said about King K Rool, Mouser or any character.

Smash bros, is also an advertising firm for its franchises, as many cross overs are.

Smash should be used a lot more as for advertising upcoming and current projects. Include some characters and levels for X, Tropical freeze, Baynatto or whatever.
Include codes for free DLC Smash characters with the purchase of upcoming 1st and important 3rd party games as a way to get people interesting in games they might otherwise ignore.
 
Wow. I mean I'm just being pessimistic about Rosalina getting in and basically being prepared for the worst case scenario that she is represented through Peach's blue costume.

But some people are proper serious about not wanting her in the game.
 
Wow. I mean I'm just being pessimistic about Rosalina getting in and basically being prepared for the worst case scenario that she is represented through Peach's blue costume.

But some people are proper serious about not wanting her in the game.

I don't know why anyone wouldn't want her (or a fleshed out Daisy) in the game. I personally would love to have more female characters.

There's only 4 in the Smash series so far.
 
In my experience (anecdotal) most people who play smash don't even know who most of the roster are. They couldn't tell you who Marth or Metakinght is let alone the games they come from.

These people won't care that Roalina is a space orphan or Daisey really loves egg salad. They are just going to pick a character they find visually appealing, so to them the princesses might as well be a selectable colour swaps.


Look how similar (and dull in my opinion) their silhouettes are.
AriPGNO.png


Compare this to the hundreds of visually interesting characters Nintendo has with strong silhouettes, shapes and colours.
csmotfw.png


Vote NO on Rosalina!

And besides, if you're really into visually dull characters they've got you covered with the Wii Fit trainers.

Bwahahaha at Misty...loooool I'm in tears. Little Mac deserves to be in and he actually offers an unique moveset as well.
 
Wow. I mean I'm just being pessimistic about Rosalina getting in and basically being prepared for the worst case scenario that she is represented through Peach's blue costume.

But some people are proper serious about not wanting her in the game.
I know one guy from another board who would take Bowser Jr. over Rosalina even though he HATES Bowser Jr.
 
nope, Sakurai actually wanted Leif in Melee not Roy!
(and it's a damn shame IS made him switch, Leif actually has a character)

Not true. While Leif was considered first, the decision to use Roy instead was Sakurai's after he got an early look of FE6. Him and the Smash Bros. DX team are even listed in the credits of FE6 under Special Thanks.

The other developers are not Sakurai's bosses and Smash Bros. isn't their game. While Sakurai probably has to get approval from them to use their characters, they can't force him to do anything.
 
Not true. While Leif was considered first, the decision to use Roy instead was Sakurai's after he got an early look of FE6. Him and the Smash Bros. DX team are even listed in the credits of FE6 under Special Thanks.

The other developers are not Sakurai's bosses and Smash Bros. isn't their game. While Sakurai probably has to get approval from them to use their characters, they can't force him to do anything.

Yeah they can.

Pokemon in particular, that approval they have to get is forcing. They get to decide who gets to be in, no matter how much sakurai wants it. They get the final say. That is how it works.
 
Sakurai has spoken of it being most difficult to work with Gamefreak, but he has never said they flat out force him to do particular things, let's not get ahead of ourselves.
 
Sakurai has spoken of it being most difficult to work with Gamefreak, but he has never said they flat out force him to do particular things, let's not get ahead of ourselves.

Its just as much forcing as marvel does with capcom.

They are very particular with with their representation, some would call it rigid instruction. Forcing isn't exactly to far off, I guess the term forcing sounds harsh for some people. But they seem to have specific instruction to how they wish to be represented, and sakura need their approval. I can use a less harsh word, but its kinda force.

Hey you wanna use are properties, you have to do x,y, and z the way we say, and we may consider some suggestions you have. Forcing GF bad guys, or makes sakurai a victim, its just something he has to negotiate with. Crossoevers are hard.
 
I remember an interview with Sakurai where he said working with GameFreak is really difficult.
I took that to mean Pokémon Company/Game Freak is strict with how its characters are depicted — that’s why the Pokémon have headwear and slightly different colors instead of six drastically different color schemes. As far as actually picking the Pokémon, that’s still up to Sakurai, though he does work closely with Pokémon Company for future-proofing with selections like Lucario.

I just don’t see Jigglypuff as a character Pokémon Company would have forced on Sakurai all these years, and the Pokémon Trainer is an overly complex (and Sakurai-esque) character that seems like an odd choice for an outsider to push. There just aren’t any playable Pokémon in the history of the series that stick out to me as being obviously forced.
 
Its just as much forcing as marvel does with capcom.

They are very particular with with their representation, some would call it rigid instruction. Forcing isn't exactly to far off, I guess the term forcing sounds harsh for some people. But they seem to have specific instruction to how they wish to be represented, and sakura need their approval. I can use a less harsh word, but its kinda force.

Hey you wanna use are properties, you have to do x,y, and z the way we say, and we may consider some suggestions you have. Forcing GF bad guys, or makes sakurai a victim, its just something he has to negotiate with. Crossoevers are hard.

You can use insisted.
 
Interesting, I stand corrected. But still - it's not like Nintendo's decision to push Rosalina just suddenly happened. The games with her on the roster were in some stage of development or already completed by the time Sakurai began working on Smash 4's roster.
It really is kind of sad that Samus's defacto rival hasn't made it in smash yet.

Don't get me wrong, I dislike Ridley and I'd rather have several characters over him, but his exclusion seems... weird. Most of the "original 8" have their villainous counterparts.
 
I took that to mean the Pokémon Company/Game Freak is strict with how its characters are depicted — that’s why the Pokémon have headwear and slightly different colors instead of six drastically different color schemes. As far as actually picking the Pokémon, that’s still up to Sakurai, though he does work closely with the Pokémon Company for future-proofing with picks like Lucario.
eh.... I have no idea about all that. I'm sure he could offer suggestions. And they may very will listen, but choice? Nah that's them.

I just don’t see Jigglypuff as a character the Pokémon Company would have forced on Sakurai all these years, and the Pokémon Trainer is an overly complex (and Sakurai-esque) character that seems like an odd choice for an outsider to push. There just aren’t any playable Pokémon in the history of the series that stick out to me as being obviously forced.
Its probably because they didn't i am sure GF isn't a dictatorship, they are just very specific.
I do not think they forced anything on sakurai character choice wise. I am aware however if they wished to exorcize they level of control , they could. They could be come like marvel and just be crazy. Though to be fair, character representation wise marvel 3 excelled at characterizing their characters , so marvel might be on to something.

You can use insisted.

I could, Sadly I'm not smart enough to think of words.
 
Its just as much forcing as marvel does with capcom.

Actually, in that regard, I've talked with Chris Baker (one of the guys at Marvel's game division) about how they came down with characters in MvC3.
What happened was that Marvel gave a list of character suggestions to Capcom and Capcom could pick whomever they wanted. And then they would work together with Marvel to make the character representation close to the books (e.g. intro/outro quips of certain match-ups, Dr. Strange's incantations, or alt costumes, etc.).

There's one character that Capcom insisted on that wasn't on Marvel's list, btw, and that's Shuma-Gorath.
 
Actually, in that regard, I've talked with Chris Baker (one of the guys at Marvel's game division) about how they came down with characters in MvC3.
What happened was that Marvel gave a list of character suggestions to Capcom and Capcom could pick whomever they wanted. And then they would work together with Marvel to make the character representation close to the books (e.g. intro/outro quips of certain match-ups, Dr. Strange's incantations, or alt costumes, etc.).

There's one character that Capcom insisted on that wasn't on Marvel's list, btw, and that's Shuma-Gorath.

That is what I was getting at. I do not think any character was forced, however how they were represented , very particular. And I realize they could exorcize that right if they really wanted to . Its a dick move, but its been done.Edit: not really I guess, its only really a dick move when you dicktate all of it, but I would understand if a company had like 3 characters they were really pushing at the moment. I'm sure during marvel 3's development, they had to have usual's and and they i'm sure deadpool was being pushed.

I didn't know the first part though interesting.
 
Well, now Marvel is actually interested in taking care of its properties instead of just giving away licenses like they did in the 90s.
And for the better, too. I would have hated Capcom so much if they had screwed up Dormammu or Dr. Strange.
 
fun fact: Capcom was so insisted on getting Shuma-gorath they even at one point offered to give Marvel one of their properties to use him.
 
Well, now Marvel is actually interested in taking care of its properties instead of just giving away licenses like they did in the 90s.
And for the better, too. I would have hated Capcom so much if they had screwed up Dormammu or Dr. Strange.


Agreed. Yesh some of those old marvel representations...

Now if we can capcom to stop making themselves broker , get some lawyers and license us up a new marvel for the generation.

Almost seems intentional with the whole Boo theme going, lol.

>>

<<

hehehe.

It wasn't intentional and I am a dummy

fun fact: Capcom was so insisted on getting Shuma-gorath they even at one point offered to give Marvel one of their properties to use him.

whoah. Did they name what they wanted to give away?
 
Most of the "original 8" have their villainous counterparts.
Only half of them do. Mario has Bowser, Link has Ganondorf, Kirby has Meta Knight/King Dedede, and Fox has Wolf.

Donkey Kong, Samus, Yoshi, and Pikachu are without rivals, and you could expand that list to Captain Falcon, Ness, and technically Jigglypuff as well.
 
Only half of them do. Mario has Bowser, Link has Ganondorf, Kirby has Meta Knight/King Dedede, and Fox has Wolf.

Donkey Kong, Samus, Yoshi, and Pikachu are without rivals, and you could expand that list to Captain Falcon, Ness, and technically Jigglypuff as well.

I guess you could count Mewtwo as the villain for the Pokemon.
 
Agreed. Yesh some of those old marvel representations...

Now if we can capcom to stop making themselves broker , get some lawyers and license us up a new marvel for the generation.



>>

<<

hehehe.

It wasn't intentional and I am a dummy



whoah. Did they name what they wanted to give away?

No, but I imagine it wasn't going to be one of their top franchises through that would be suicide, it was probably something that was more or less dead like Ghost n goblins, Strider or final fight etc.
 
fun fact: Capcom was so insisted on getting Shuma-gorath they even at one point offered to give Marvel one of their properties to use him.

This is disturbingly sad.

No, but I imagine it wasn't going to be one of their top franchises through that would be suicide, it was probably something that was more or less dead like Ghost n goblins, Strider or final fight etc.

Lol nothing you listed is dead (Nintendo only fan I presume?), strider (also belongs to the manga artist so he's co-owned) has just been reborn and they still love goblins. Most likely would be breath of fire.
 
Yeah, could be cool. Though iirc, Strider is/was co-owned by a Squeenix designer. So that couldn't have been put up for offer at the time.

It would actually give marvel more excuses to use the hand.

Oh yeah, that would make things complicated.

Same thing with karin from street fighter right?
 
Top Bottom