Bento said:"Horrible"? Isn't that quite the exaggeration for a law that is rarely applied?
duckroll said:How many people here really think that Sweden and Switzerland are the same country?
If that's the case then that's already considerable. Some health care systems openly advise against such stuff (just because the risk increase translates to higher expenditures at the bottomline).Hitokage said:I remember reading an article saying that the risk with first cousins is equal to that of waiting ten years.
I don't have a sister though...samus i am said:Obviously he wants to bang his sister.
Should everything that's gross be illegal?samus i am said:It isn't even a religion thing. There is an extreme gross factor to it. Plus your kids could come out retarded (in the true sense of the word).
But they don't ban them.blu said:If that's the case then that's already considerable. Some health care systems openly advise against such stuff (just because the risk increase translates to higher expenditures at the bottomline).
zoku88 said:Can't really say anything about this except that it is logical.
I really don't think Sweden and Switzerland are the same country, I just always get confused between the two. It's like Niger and Nigeria.
So you're fine with incest being illegal just as a tool to attack something else?Jeff-DSA said:Incest is the prosecutable part though. That's where they get them.
Swedenland?duckroll said:How many people here really think that Sweden and Switzerland are the same country?
In the first generation.zoku88 said:But they don't ban them.
And the risk is still fractions of a percent, IIRC
It's not that I don't find incest gross, but I'm not sure this is a terribly coherent argument. I don't know of many governments that do anything to legally prevent couples with high risks of birth defects from procreating.Hitokage said:As far as science is concerned:
Cousins? Sure.
Immediate Family? Nah.
duckroll said:How many people here really think that Sweden and Switzerland are the same country?
Shurs said:Great.
I don't think anyone should have the right to tell two consenting adults that they cannot be together.
Why extend rights to straight, gay, lesbian, bisexual and transexual people but not to those who choose to engage in incestuous relations?
I have never engaged in incest, nor do I have the desire to do so, but that doesn't mean that people shouldn't be able to partake if that's they want to.
The gross factor is subjective, I don't feel it at all... Some people think anal sex is gross, I think it's hot. They're entitled to their opinion, as long as they live me alone. Grossness is not enough to make something illegal.samus i am said:It isn't even a religion thing. There is an extreme gross factor to it. Plus your kids could come out retarded (in the true sense of the word).
catfish said:For the same reason we don't let people fuck kids, because the result of such an UNHOLY union, could fuck up a 3 eyed kid real bad.
Keep this shit banned and stop comparing it to gays.
Shurs said:Great.
I don't think anyone should have the right to tell two consenting adults that they cannot be together.
Why extend rights to straight, gay, lesbian, bisexual and transexual people but not to those who choose to engage in incestuous relations?
I have never engaged in incest, nor do I have the desire to do so, but that doesn't mean that people shouldn't be able to partake if that's they want to do.
Oh boy ^^ Sweden has a yellow cross... I think you're referring to DenmarkDavidion said:White cross on the flag, white linens on the chef.
Close enough, imo.
vordhosbn said:it's not funny anymore.
Bento said:Oh boy ^^ Sweden has a yellow cross... I think you're referring to Denmark
Depends on if I have to pick up the bill to pay for their retarded baby or not In the case of most European countries, we have to.dude said:And retarded people also create retarded babies, should it be illegal for them to procreate too?
: ODavidion said:
That's a whole different issue. I believe one that is going on in the Libertarians thread.Bento said:Depends on if I have to pick up the bill to pay for their retarded baby or not
Indeed, but I wouldn't be comfortable banning something on the idea that it takes generations upon generations of doing it repeatedly in order for it to have an ill-effect on society.Legendary Warrior said:In the first generation.
Well, would you be opposed to it if it had an "ill effect" on society in the first generation, or was that line just for effect?zoku88 said:Indeed, but I wouldn't be comfortable banning something on the idea that it takes generations upon generations of doing it repeatedly in order for it to have an ill-effect on society.
There's no problem with foreign gay couples who already have adopted a kid though. The biggest problem are the adoption agencies in Switzerland, because they don't support adoption by gay people.Gaborn said:Actually Switzerland doesn't allow gay couples to adopt.
Gaborn said:Actually Switzerland doesn't allow gay couples to adopt or to marry. They have registered partnerships with some of the rights of marriage.
No, they don't, but they're fairly strict about allowing them. In Canada, for instance, you'd have to sign some legal papers for a bunch of the mandatory procedures related to late-age pregnancies.zoku88 said:But they don't ban them.
Actually, IIRC, for some particular defects (e.g. Down syndrome) the risk is far from fractions of a percent, and moreover, it grows worse than linearly with age (I'm tempted to say exponentially, but as I don't recall the figures, I'll just refrain).And the risk is still fractions of a percent, IIRC
BloodySinner said:Something tells me GAF in general is banging their siblings...
zoku88 said:Indeed, but I wouldn't be comfortable banning something on the idea that it takes generations upon generations of doing it repeatedly in order for it to have an ill-effect on society.
Shurs said:They are allowed to have sex, right?
Markster said:Plenty of people are pressured into "consenting" monogamous, heterosexual marriages too. Should those be illegal?
dude said:I don't have a sister though...I do have a brother
I really don't think Sweden and Switzerland are the same country, I just always get confused between the two. It's like Niger and Nigeria.
Gaborn said:Of course.
why?methos75 said:Disgusting if passed
How do you even prove that? That's an impossible to enforce law.RoadHazard said:Yes, if a person is being forced/pressured against their will to marry someone, I do think that should be illegal.
I only confuse the names, I'm not that bad...RoadHazard said:Except that Niger and Nigeria are neighbors, while Sweden and Switzerland are in different parts of Europe. But I suppose you just meant that you get the names confused? It's a pretty common mistake for people not living in or close to any of them, I guess. And there's also the thing with both us and Switzerland being known for being neutral contries.
I would be opposed to reproduction when it's likely to produce disorders, so yes, I would be opposed to having incestuous couple reproduce if what you said were the case.Legendary Warrior said:Well, would you be opposed to it if it had an "ill effect" on society in the first generation, or was that line just for effect?
Neo C. said:There's no problem with foreign gay couples who already have adopted a kid though. The biggest problem are the adoption agencies in Switzerland, because they don't support adoption by gay people.
btkadams said:why?
i just don't give a fuck what other people do in their bedrooms to be honest. i can't even muster a thought to possibly do anything like that with my family without getting physically ill, but i really don't care what other people do.
Something tells me Gaf has trouble banging anything...BloodySinner said:Something tells me GAF in general is banging their siblings...
Self-hate was invented here, Calvin did his shit here first. :lolTyrant_Onion said:Switzerland is racist against foreigners and locals.
Tyrant_Onion said:It's also okay if you had a sex change below the age of 25 before you come to our country, but not when you are native Swiss.
Switzerland is racist against foreigners and locals.
Speevy said:Because unlike gays doing anything, this really is a slippery slope.
If it's legal for a sister and brother to have sex, then it's legal for a father and daughter. And why stop at a 56 year old father and his 23 year old daughter.
A 6 year old daughter wouldn't have any choice in the matter, and would grow up thinking it was perfectly fine, whether child abuse/molestation was still illegal or not.
Speevy said:Because unlike gays doing anything, this really is a slippery slope.
If it's legal for a sister and brother to have sex, then it's legal for a father and daughter. And why stop at a 56 year old father and his 23 year old daughter.
A 6 year old daughter wouldn't have any choice in the matter, and would grow up thinking it was perfectly fine, whether child abuse/molestation was still illegal or not.
Neo C. said:Self-hate was invented here, Calvin did his shit here first. :lol