• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Take-Two CEO: "THQ won't be around in six months".

Considering NBA 2K series has trounced NBA Live in quality the past 2 years, I'm surprised about T2's comments over licensing deals. I wonder if there's been a road block in renegotiating their license with the NBA. Or perhaps EA, feeling that their game is becoming more irrelevant, is trying to secure an exclusive license with the NBA.
 
Considering NBA 2K series has trounced NBA Live in quality the past 2 years, I'm surprised about T2's comments over licensing deals. I wonder if there's been a road block in renegotiating their license with the NBA. Or perhaps EA, feeling that their game is becoming more irrelevant, is trying to secure an exclusive license with the NBA.

Is this post from before 2009?
 
Sad to say that this thread title almost deserves the SHOCKING NEWS tag.

They are in Acclaim style trouble here and have been for some time.
 
Tough love, Zelnick was a hated man by wall street for refusing to let EA buy Take-Two, now he looks smart for that decision and has earned the right to make these observations.
 
Doesn't Take Two despite having some of the best selling and most acclaimed series bleeds money every year? I mean, it's not like they are on the top of the world themselves. That said, any company who greenlits RDR is fine by me.
 

Just off the top of my head FASA, Ensemble, Rare, Lionhead, and Bungie--all of which were closed, turned into shells of their former selves, or jumped ship. Clearly MS is one of the last buyers we should be wishing upon Vigil, Volition, or Relic.
 
Just off the top of my head FASA, Ensemble, Rare, Lionhead, and Bungie--all of which were closed, turned into shells of their former selves, or jumped ship. Clearly MS is one of the last buyers we should be wishing upon Vigil, Volition, or Relic.

Now that is a vague accusation.
 
I hope the following survive:

Warhammer 40k (I loved Space Marine!)
Red Faction (more like Guerrilla!)
Saints Row
Darksiders

Everything else is meh.
 
Darksiders, Metro, Saints Row, Red Faction, Warhammer would be neat franchises for Nintendo.

Nintendo should gobble them up.
 
Only reason I'd somewhat care about this is because Volition, and I'm still not too sure if I even care looking at the way they took their masterpiece in in Red Faction: Guerrilla and just shat on it in the sequel.

But if they survive and find a new home they better drop this ridiculous Saints Row style stuff and return to making something fun with that destruction engine they got or go back to making something like Descent or FreeSpace. Damn, we don't have enough good space flight combat games.
 
Nintendo needs mismanaged sub par game developers? Outside of Vigil of course, Darksiders is a better Zelda than Zelda.

yes just yes. There hasn't been a truly great Zelda game since OOT. Windwaker almost but the end fetch quest ruined it. Maybe if I played the GC version of Twilight Princess ?

1j46ec.gif


It's all my fault.

I never bought deBlob.

me either, i genuinely feel bad there cause it was a good game too.
 
Aside from console warrior greed, is there any reason to want THQ's developers to be swallowed up by MS or Nintendo? (Or Sony for that matter)
 
Aside from console warrior greed, is there any reason to want THQ's developers to be swallowed up by MS or Nintendo? (Or Sony for that matter)

for me, UFC is the only standout property there - it's really popular, and i think that's still growing (was said earlier that it now has a presence on live as well).
 
me either, i genuinely feel bad there cause it was a good game too.

It was one reason why I bought so few of the much hyped 3rd party titles on the Wii. It was boring and repetitive. 3rd parties should not wonder about their sales when Nintendo's titles are just so much better.
In the end, THQ saw what happens when a game is hyped but does not deliver: The sequel flopped.


Wrong. I played Darksiders and I played Skyward Sword. The latter is the better game.

Haven't played Darksiders, and now I probably won't. I enjoyed the core gameplay mechanics in Skyward Sword and the bosses, the rest felt archaic and lifeless.

I know, my standards are high. But usually, Nintendo knows how to satisfy my needs.
 
My god, what an arrogant prick.

THQ might not be living its best moments, yet these words are terribly harsh and indelicate.
It's just too bad that Devil's Third will never come out (cuz we all know it's pretty much vaporware at this point).
i'd LOVE to be proven wrong by Itagaki though! :P
 
I don't think Zelnick is completely wrong. Sure, it's a crass statement, and it is pretty frustrating to hear one company rip another when they're financially unstable, but the lack of unlicensed games probably helps their revenue.

I don't like his idea that THQ's IP's are not of the same quality. I think Saints Row (while derivative and maybe even uninspired in the first game) has proved to be it's own crazy, awesome franchise. I think deBlob (which I bought on DAY ONE!) is fucking fantastic. I'm a sucker that buys annual releases of WWE games every year, and I love their improvements to the UFC franchise. I bought Darksiders after a huge price drop, and am trying to begin it soon.

But in this economy, I'm not the typical consumer. These titles are all great games, but their sales are no where near the Rockstar IP's (I'm a Rockstar fangirl by heart!), and I don't think the company has that one go-to title for revenue. I'm so excited about Itagaki's project (but that still seems niche) and I'm always ready for anything Volition related. Hell, I just want to see some casual updates for the WWE and I'm more than satisfied. But their sales are suffering, and I hope they make it out alright.
 
Square Enix-Eidos is the best possible match for the healthy studios at THQ.

If it's Nintendo/MS/Sony, the games will be platform exclusives

If it's EA/Activision/Ubisoft/etc., the studios will either be destroyed (EA), relegated to CoD DLC maps (Activision), or set to built modules for the next AssCreed.
 
Top Bottom