Shao Kahn Brewing a Stew
Banned
My brain hurts from the conspiracy surrounding this matter.
Who is lying? Who is telling the truth? Head exploding!
Who is lying? Who is telling the truth? Head exploding!
Pie and Beans said:That really isn't the response to field to make this all go away. You swallow your shit, apologise profusely and pay up with something extra for the bother, you don't play the coy "well SORRRRRRY mom" card when everyones looking at you like a jagass already.
shagg_187 said:My brain hurts from the conspiracy surrounding this matter.
Who is lying? Who is telling the truth? Head exploding!
Aliensshagg_187 said:My brain hurts from the conspiracy surrounding this matter.
Who is lying? Who is telling the truth? Head exploding!
tsab said:Telltale > Tell tale > Tell story > Tell fiction > Tell lie
*Mindblown*
Yes, they should have, but at the same time, I can understand where they were coming from. They had no way of knowing if there were any cosmetic damages present on the jeep prior to shipping. Even after the damage, it still appears to be in great shape.It is true that by signing the BL you end up absolving the carrier of responsibility. Telltale claiming they didn't know the Jeep was damaged is at that point irrelevant. I'm sure their main point is going to be pleading ignorance, but they should have contacted the guy before signing.
I was paid just above the area minimum wage, worked around 50-60 hours a week and had a three to six hour daily commute.
So Boomer is supposedly a scammer and liar? Wow, this story gets more and more interesting.Jintor said:
Jintor said:
DangerStepp said:Just now seeing this.
GAF is now People's Court?
How many people here have already proclaimed they're boycotting TT?
Jintor said:
The problem stems from the fact that HE selected the carrier and witnessed the fact that it would not be a covered transport, yet still gave the go ahead. That was not a part of his original claim.yeah he sure scammed them out of... lending them his personal property for a trade show, not receiving the previously agreed comp (some damn PAX badges) and then expecting damage to be covered for and repaired.
The truth probably lies somewhere in the middle.Dibbz said:Wait so Boomer is a scammer running a smear campaign against TT? What is going on?
WoodenLung said:I am boycotting their Jurassic park game.
because it looks bad
Quick! Get the pitchforks ready for the insurance company!dark10x said:The truth probably lies somewhere in the middle.
I know alot of GAF likes to raise the pitchforks at any sign of corporate misdeed situations like this are a good reason why it's always smart to wait and listen to both sides of the stories. It's so disgusting that one guy actually received threats over the phone and email because of this.dark10x said:The problem stems from the fact that HE selected the carrier and witnessed the fact that it would not be a covered transport, yet still gave the go ahead. That was not a part of his original claim.
He chose the carrier, the carrier damaged the vehicle, and information as to the state of the vehicle was not present to TellTale. That's not to say they shouldn't cover the damages, but this guy isn't being completely honest either.
Pretty sure the former TT employee is a femaleBaron_Calamity said:I feel really bad for the former Telltale guy. Even if he personally damaged that Jeep (which he didn't) he didn't deserve the internet calling him up and threatening to rape him.
I wish I was thinking more clearly yesterday. Doing this the day before the game launch should have clued me in to something being wrong.
Here are screenshots from a few emails that disprove his major points. Here and here. ( I removed the images before posting, I can't do that, but they have been sent to boomer via a reply to his threatening emails to me even after he knew I left Telltale) The dates in the top right are the from the first time he started a fake smear campaign and I had to compile emails so our lawyer could help him file claims. Even though at that point he was obviously scamming us we still tried to help him. I won't post anything else but I have hundreds of emails concerning this. Even before the event he kept demanding that we change the terms. It got so bad that I refused to talk to him and asked him to email me so there was a record. As soon as I met him at PAX I knew something was off, he started claiming damage before he got there and saw the jeep. Even now his massive exaggerations are showing through. What he calls a "joyride" was the thirty feet we had to take the car to be inspected and the gas removed. The only reason I wasn't driving it was because my license was expired by a few days and we wanted everything to be 100% legit. I know there is more than one PAX enforcer here that can confirm the distance.
It IS spiteful and I don't blame her one bit, based on the harassment she received.Finally, by calling boomerjinks out as a "scammer" it only serves to escalate tension when we should actually be at a point where that is scaling back in. It feels spiteful.
She deserves more until she presents the evidence she claims to have.dark10x said:It IS spiteful and I don't blame her one bit, based on the harassment she received.
You really think that somebody deserves death and rape threats over some supposed damage to a movie prop?Ignis Fatuus said:She deserves more until she presents the evidence she claims to have.
Ignis Fatuus said:She deserves more until she presents the evidence she claims to have.
Seriously? If you really feel that way you have serious problems.Ignis Fatuus said:She deserves more until she presents the evidence she claims to have.
BlueMagic said:TellTale are jerks. Plus, their games suck. YOU HEAR ME TELLTALE? BTTF WAS SHIT.
EDIT: Jokes aside, what's the current situation? Any plot twist?
dark10x said:The problem stems from the fact that HE selected the carrier and witnessed the fact that it would not be a covered transport, yet still gave the go ahead. That was not a part of his original claim.
He chose the carrier, the carrier damaged the vehicle, and information as to the state of the vehicle was not present to TellTale. That's not to say they shouldn't cover the damages, but this guy isn't being completely honest either.
NintendoGal said:Incorrect. He simply found the carrier online and sent the SUGGESTION to TT who then selected it themselves.
Hate to split hairs here, but I've been on the bad end of picking things, such as a hotel when I thought it was decent.
If he suggested it, he holds the blame for that side of things. Furthermore, he knew that it would be transported without a container and should have declined if he were so concerned.NintendoGal said:Incorrect. He simply found the carrier online and sent the SUGGESTION to TT who then selected it themselves.
Hate to split hairs here, but I've been on the bad end of picking things, such as a hotel when I thought it was decent.
dark10x said:If he suggested it, he holds the blame for that side of things. Furthermore, he knew that it would be transported without a container and should have declined if he were so concerned.
Lastly, as I noted before, TT was never given any indication as to the state of the vehicle when it left the owner. Even with the blemishes, it still appears to be in excellent condition. Is it that strange that they accepted the vehicle at that point?
mclem said:...but doesn't him suggesting it to TT imply that he felt the carrier was adequate?
dark10x said:If he suggested it, he holds the blame for that side of things. Furthermore, he knew that it would be transported without a container and should have declined if he were so concerned.
Lastly, as I noted before, TT was never given any indication as to the state of the vehicle when it left the owner. Even with the blemishes, it still appears to be in excellent condition. Is it that strange that they accepted the vehicle at that point?
Boomerjinks is the person with the expensive, custom cars, and TellTale is a software company. It's not unreasonable to assume that TellTale went with his suggestion because they figured he knew what he wanted.NintendoGal said:Incorrect. He simply found the carrier online and sent the SUGGESTION to TT who then selected it themselves.
Hate to split hairs here, but I've been on the bad end of picking things, such as a hotel when I thought it was decent.
I really hope that it was this very post that got you banned.Ignis Fatuus said:She deserves more until she presents the evidence she claims to have.