ZackieChan
Member
Good Christ, when I thought you could not been more wrong, you come and post this?
Thanks for your well thought out rebuttal.
You sound like a poor 
Good Christ, when I thought you could not been more wrong, you come and post this?
Dude, you derided fellow gaffer fiction on why she didn't have a passport because of her hardships and you claim the moral high ground?Thanks for your well thought out rebuttal.
You sound like a poor
1b. Rich people are trusting
Surprisingly, a great deal of rich people leave their car and house doors open. Conversely, in areas of poverty, you'll find that this behavior is highly unlikely to happen. Rich people have the tendency to trust those they meet (within reason) and give others the opportunity to be themselves.
5a. Poor people want the cheapest way
5b. Rich people want the best way
Dude, you derided fellow gaffer fiction on why she didn't have a passport because of her hardships and you claim the moral high ground?
yes. I'm sure it's a trust issue and has nothing to do with the fact that car and that house are all they have.
So poor people only have negative qualities? Do we only measure the virtues of a man by how much of a material impact he has on the world? I come from a family of Jehovahs Witnesses and whether they are wealthy or poor has very little impact on the value they get out of life. Yes it's an edge case but it's weird for me seeing a list that seems so 1 dimensional.
You say this to a person with with children?The fuck are you talking about?
Edit: where am I claiming the moral high ground? I just want you to have a substantive comment instead of merely talking shit.
This is pretty much why I've avoided kids and will continue to indefinitely. Though, again, there are plenty who travel extensively with young children. You just have to make some rather drastic changes to how you earn income, which many admittedly cannot do.
My rich neighbors were disgruntled when they found that their Porsche did not come in a specific shade of green, which they deeply wanted. Because of this, they decided to custom build their green Porsche with unprecedented specifications. I've never seen such a thing!
Where does it say that poor people only have negative qualities?
fucking nailed it. Should have been 1st post. And yes it's astrolad.*Strokes chin while ordering $100k escort to stroke my penis* very interesting indeed, if only those poors had my wisdom.
You say this to a person with with children?
11. Rich people are more often than not the children of rich people.
Poor people are not.
Given financial hardship, I don't know think you get the message.Saying that I don't want to have children, but know people who have raised children while traveling extensively is "deriding" someone now? What planet are you from?
Where does it say that poor people only have negative qualities?
I buy used books for a maximum of 1 , because I'm poor.
Given financial hardship, I don't know think you get the message.
The whole article is about how being rich is a virtue and being poor is a vice, it's disgusting neoliberal bias sentiment that has brainwashed a country and led to the incarceration of millions of poor and a total lack of empathy when the US treats developing nations like shit.
Huh? I'm taking about the article linked in the OP. Where are the virtuous qualities of poor people in that article? It's all subjective, and they clearly only have one way in which they want to spin it.Where does it say that poor people only have negative qualities?
That's the whole idea of our new way of doing capitalism, if you're not successful it's because of an inherent flaw in your character that is under your control, therefore you don't deserve help from those that are better off. I'm guessing that mindset has been pretty large in America for a while and my country (the UK) is currently adopting those neo liberal views now.Basically this guy says in the article that he once was poor and became rich because he changed his behaviour. Well great for him, but to be rich it's not only a matter of being active and positive, that helps for sure, but reality is much more complex than this. A lot of people is entrepreneur, but only few can success in that, and mostly of them the luck take a great part. Also maybe some people is unable to leave the povertly because big debts that maybe aren't even his fault, or are because an illness or something else. That's why I find this article stupid and provocative.
When will people realize that it is mathematically impossible for anything beyond a minority of people to be rich?
In order to move from poor to rich, you need to make several times more money than you spend in making said money. With very few rare exceptions, that is not really possible without resorting to the work of others, who must generate you more money than you spend on them so the numbers work out in the end. It's like a pyramid: the base must be thicker than the top.
So, even if every single person developed "rich people qualities" and started "working real hard" the vast majority would never be able to become rich because there simply is no room for everyone in front of the boat.
That is true to some extend, but the examples used here are just ridiculous. Painting your Porsche a certain shade of green is not really some kind of example on how to create opportunities.I recognize a lot of my old way of thinking in the "poor people" points of this article. I also recognize this in my how my parents used to operate. I'm sure it prevented them from having success and joy in their work. So I think there's some truth in this article.
Rich people have money, poor people don't. That's about it.
What a POS article "rich people are paragons of virtue, poor people suck". And that final dissing at tv sets from books, they are just mediums ffs. A novel is not better than a movie.
That is true to some extend, but the examples used here are just ridiculous. Painting your Porsche a certain shade of green is not really some kind of example on how to create opportunities.
That is how it is in general broI think the article is worth discussing in a reasonable way, but GAF certainly isn't capable of that. On GAF, if you're rich it's because you were born into money, if you're poor it's because you're oppressed. Ironically there's no accountability in either scenario.
Pretty interesting article that actually makes you question some of the beliefs you might have about poor people being just products of their environment or social factors. I know some might see it as negative or blaming, but it's actually much more hopeful than that when you think about it as a philosophy more geared towards encouraging people to make positive changes and control their own destinies rather than playing The Blame Game.
Pretty thought-provoking stuff all around even if you don't agree with every single point.
http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/253331
I think the article is worth discussing in a reasonable way, but GAF certainly isn't capable of that. On GAF, if you're rich it's because you were born into money, if you're poor it's because you're oppressed. Ironically there's no accountability in either scenario.
I think the article is worth discussing in a reasonable way, but GAF certainly isn't capable of that. On GAF, if you're rich it's because you were born into money, if you're poor it's because you're oppressed. Ironically there's no accountability in either scenario.
1-3% are always going to have the majority of the money, that's just the way things are. But if they're going to control most of the assets, then they need to spend those assets and re-invest that money into circulation not just to use it to generate more personal income for themselves.
That is true to some extend, but the examples used here are just ridiculous. Painting your Porsche a certain shade of green is not really some kind of example on how to create opportunities.
No matter how much the money circulates, my point is that it is impossible for everyone but a minority to get to the point where they can buy a porsche or live in a mansion. To get there you need to rely, directly or indirectly, on the services of people who must make less than you, like a food chain. So, this piling on the poor becomes malignant, since they must exist in order to support the rich.
It's much easier to be creative when you're raised in an environment that encourages it and isn't worrying about whether to pay rent or buy food next week.I think that's a ridiculous example too. Not sure what the author was thinking.
The gist of 7 seems reasonable though; don't copy others, but find your own way of getting things done, use your unique strengths and dare to be creative.
It's much easier to be creative when you're raised in an environment that encourages it and isn't worrying about whether to pay rent or buy food next week.