Smiles and Cries
Member
hopefully it will not be called Macbook Touch :lol
Xater said:That's so fake. :lol
This post reminds me of a video of a TED Talk I saw a year or so ago, I can't remember from what TED year it was but the demonstration was of some new zooming/scaling technology where you'd see a newspaper front page and zoom in on it (i think they even had gesture/pinch zooming on a touch screen) and the article would present more information and text when zoomed in. Almost like a glorified PDF but more interactive.Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:People are thinking too literally about this being a magazine and book device. Jobs doesn't want that, and I doubt Apple cares to get into that business.
It's going to be like the NY Times rumor from today that talks about how it can show an enhanced version of the Times with video and interactive elements. It's not about taking current newspapers and putting them onto a screen. It's going to be about creating the new newspaper.
What, so you'd prefer to wait until they get a brand new tablet only platform going, get all the devs and ODMs involved, take a few years for them to develop something usable, and then allow us to use the software? OK!krypt0nian said:Not at all. I fully understand, as does the rest of the thread, the difference between an OS and an app. If their solution is just run an app over the top of Win7, then they may as well stay home. :lol
i could live with it.Smiles and Cries said:hopefully it will not be called Macbook Touch :lol
btkadams said:i could live with it.
iMac!mrkgoo said:I think they would like to distinguish the "iDevices" from the "Mac" devices.
Since I believe the tablet is more on the "i" side of things, I would say the "" monicker is more likely than the mac one.
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:iMac!
mrkgoo said:I think they would like to distinguish the "iDevices" from the "Mac" devices.
Since I believe the tablet is more on the "i" side of things, I would say the "" monicker is more likely than the mac one.
Same as the word about anything: no one knows a single thing at all. It's all just guessing.blu said:so what's the word on any potential BC/emulation of current App Store apps?
Tobor said:Introducing iBook.
BrandNew said:what time is the keynote on wednesday again?
fair enough.Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:Same as the word about anything: no one knows a single thing at all. It's all just guessing.
"Dudes, why do you want to wait for the Playstation 2 when the Dreamcast is out and already has games!"Shogmaster said:What, so you'd prefer to wait until they get a brand new tablet only platform going, get all the devs and ODMs involved, take a few years for them to develop something usable, and then allow us to use the software? OK!
If I waited for all that with Tablet PCs, I'd be stuck with you fools still! :lol
Suckers...
My iPod touch is my TiVo remote, my iTunes remote AND controls my computers when I want it to. I also use it a lot to look stuff up from other rooms. I use my iPod touch a lot more than I would have expected.LovingSteam said:Shhh... nobody uses their iPhone's or Touch's at home!
BrandNew said:Oh man.
So are we going to assume that there's a big artistic draw to the tablet as well, based on the invites and design of the building?
Leaks incoming...DECK'ARD said:Apple are busy decorating the building for the press event, covering it with paint splodges by the looks of it:
![]()
Shit's getting real!
Question: How many 500 errors will this event cause on Wednesday?
BrandNew said:Oh man.
So are we going to assume that there's a big artistic draw to the tablet as well, based on the invites and design of the building?
cjelly said:Leaks incoming...
Tobor said:Gruber is back this morning with a giant piece on Apple v. Flash.
It's an absolute lock that Flash will not be on the tablet. Prepare to light your balls on fire accordingly.
http://daringfireball.net/2010/01/apple_adobe_flash
StrikerObi said:No ban bet or anything, but here's my list:
OS, Software, and UI
- It runs "OS X" (for tablet, in the sense that iPhone runs "OS X"... for iPhone)
- An iPhone style OS in that it will be locked down. No direct file system access.
- An interface similar to the iPhone's, but as others have said probably with room for widgets on the home screen.
Keyser Soze said:OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG
StrikerObi said:Great piece. This was obviously spurred by YouTube's HTML5 beta, but I'm surprised he didn't mention it in the piece itself.
YouTube in HTML5 is the best thing to happen to the web in a long time. Step 1 to throwing off the shackles of Flash. YouTube has got to be the most-visited site on the web that uses Flash. Once all the browsers (IE, FireFox, Safari, Chrome -- 2 down 2 to go) support HTML5 video with h.264, YouTube can flip a switch and make HTML5 the default. Flash will just disappear off of their site, and slowly other sites will fall like dominoes. Flash YouTube will remain of course, and videos that can't be converted to h.264 will continue to run in the Flash player. That doesn't matter though. As soon as HTML5 becomes the default (rather than the option), Flash is dead.
panda21 said:well as much as i can't wait to see flash disappear, i think its going to take more than youtube.
flash adverts and page decoration/navigation are all over the place, and afaik (love to be told otherwise though) there are no tools that come close to adobe's flash authoring stuff for html 5/css based ads. hell the text in html 5 canvas is still boned. i'm not sure css 3 would really cut it compared to flash either.
SephCast said:What are you OMG'ing about?
panda21 said:a giant iphone doesnt sound that appealing, but then thinking about it the web browsing isnt great on the iphone and its too small to read pdfs.
Tobor said:None of that matters to users, though. The issue has always been video, the rest is secondary. Once the bulk of video is in HTML5, and advertisers realize that their flash ads aren't reaching a large percentage of browsers, the rest will fall into place pretty quickly.
guise said:But does HTML5 and H.264 permit managed advertising? ...it doesnt on youtube (yet)
Until the actually publishers of online/on-demand video (which isnt user-generated) can control the advertising revenue streams of their videos using HTML5 i cant see it kicking off mainstream.
panda21 said:well as much as i can't wait to see flash disappear, i think its going to take more than youtube.
flash adverts and page decoration/navigation are all over the place, and afaik (love to be told otherwise though) there are no tools that come close to adobe's flash authoring stuff for html 5/css based ads. hell the text in html 5 canvas is still boned. i'm not sure css 3 would really cut it compared to flash either.
jamieson87 said:Why so tense? :lol
StrikerObi said:But nobody installs flash to look at page decoration/navigation and ads. They install it for video (and games).
Flash will always be around, especially for games. But the only reason Flash is an 800 pound gorilla is because of video. At a certain point, if/when all or most video runs in HTML5, I won't need to have Flash installed anymore. I don't play flash games, and I'm not going to keep Flash installed just so I can look at those awesome flash-based ads. I'll be happy as a pig in shit when those flash-ads can't load (I use ClickToFlash for now).
YouTube is just the first domino. Lots of users only USE flash for video. As a side effect, lots of companies can take advantage of this and create their whole site in Flash and other sites can put flash ads on their pages. But if people stop needing Flash for video, then for lots of them, there's no reason to keep it installed. In turn, companies will stop creating pages and ads in Flash. In this way, Flash continues to lose dominance until it disappears. You can see this already happening a little bit thanks to the iPhone. CEO of a Fortune 500 company can't access his company's website on his iPhone because the site is in Flash. He tells the web guys to "fix it" (which means axing Flash and making a new site).
Though in reality Joe Average won't uninstall Flash once he doesn't need it. It'll just languish on his system. But when he buys a next computer, he won't install Flash because he will never be prompted to install it to watch a video on YouTube. This is the way Flash dies.
What's hilarious is that in this case, you have the DC and I have the PS2 since TPC are far more powerful.Kano On The Phone said:"Dudes, why do you want to wait for the Playstation 2 when the Dreamcast is out and already has games!"
Shogmaster said:What's hilarious is that in this case, you have the DC and I have the PS2 since TPC are far more powerful.![]()
Technosteve said:I just turned my pc in to a mac over the weekend, what i really don't like about the mac os x is the single window model, i can't do side by side windows with out a script. Since iphone is limited to one object window at a time it's not a big deal, but for the tablet if i want to browse the web and watch a video at the same time will it let me?