WaterAstro
Member
Planets move bro.
All of us, we're moving.
All the time.
It's R E L A T I V E.
And spaceships move... faster, like, FTL fast.
Planets move bro.
All of us, we're moving.
All the time.
It's R E L A T I V E.
I'll always argue against the space battles of Rogue One, simply because the big ships warp in...then sit there and do nothing. It's awful on re-watches especially noticing you never see them shoot any big guns or anything. It frustrates me just because I love big space battles and was letdown at not seeing them do anything. I was expecting some awesome stuff like the example already given here:
I watched that Mass Effect video linked earlier and they briefly touch upon it.The Fact that most FTL in movies is through hyperspace deprives us of cool moments using relativistic projectiles. Dropping a rock is the most simple and most brutish form of space destruction and I can't remember ever seeing it in a movie. It's like there is an specific level of technological advancement in which it would be used, get too civilized and then it is the equivalent of a WWI soldier with chain mail and a pike.
"This recruits is a 20 kilo Ferris slug, feel the weight. Every 5 seconds the main gun of an Everest class dreadnought accelerates 1 to 1.3% of lights speed. It impacts with the force of a 38 kiloton bomb, that is 3 times the yield of the city buster dropped on Hiroshima back on Earth. That means, Sir Isaac Newton is the deadliest son of a bitch in space! Now, serviceman Burnside! What is Newtons first law?
Sir! An object in motion stays in motion, sir!
No credit for partial answers, maggot!
Sir! unless acted on by an outside force, sir!
Damn straight! I dare to assume that you ignorant jackasses know that space is empty. Once you fire this hunk of metal, it keeps going till it hits something. That can be a ship, or the planet behind that ship. It might go off into deep space and hit somebody else in ten thousand years. If you pull the trigger on this, you are ruining someone's day, somewhere and sometime. That is why you check your damn targets! That is why you wait for the computer to give you a damn firing solution! That is why, Serviceman Chung, we do not "eyeball it"! This is a weapon of mass destruction. You are not a cowboy shooting from the hip!
Sir, yes sir!"
I watched that Mass Effect video linked earlier and they briefly touch upon it.
Still, 0.01c isn't even in the neighborhood of 0.5c. I imagine a world with relativistic weapons would ban them by treaty/convention like nukes are today. Using them would be far too cruel and destructive to be worth it.
BSG was probably the best at this.
I only got a small taste of that nullsec life but warping with your fleet via Titan is just one of the best feelings.B-R5RB has already been mentioned but here is video footage of the Battle of Asakai (a different one), you can see all the titan pilots (avatars specifically) jumping into the system at 3:30+.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLqb-m1ZZUA
Note that everything you see on screen, all those different ships, everything is a single player, no single AI/scripted events.
I'd say The Expanse is eveb better if you are into realistic battles with lots of physics juggling and projectiles tearing shit up port to starboard.
But as far as big dumb (and fun) battles go, BSG remaing the king of TV.
That's simply not how FTL works in a lot if these pieces of fiction. There'ers plenty of time. In star trek a ship has warped through objects to escape an object without any damage to said object.
B-R5RB has already been mentioned but here is video footage of the Battle of Asakai (a different one), you can see all the titan pilots (avatars specifically) jumping into the system at 3:30+.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLqb-m1ZZUA
Note that everything you see on screen, all those different ships, everything is a single player, no single AI/scripted events.
The opening chapter of Iain M. Banks Excession, but the payoff is at the end of the book. But you'll be glad.
That's really dumb. So you can use subspace to "phase" as well? What if you phased directly into another object?
I didn't really think much of this when watching the show but now I'm curious and I googled to see if there were any answers.BTW, why was it in BSG that ships could shrug off hits from nukes?
Nuclear explosion damage comes in three flavours:
1.Direct heat
2.Blast overpressure
3.Prompt (mostly gamma) radiation
Type 2 is only applicable in an atmosphere. There is no blast in space as there's no air to create the blast.
Type 3 is expected to be sustainable by a space worthy ship. Interstellar space is a very radiation rich environment, so we can assume the ship is radiation proof.
This leaves direct heating. In space this would consist mainly of radiative heat transfer. Large amounts of this would be directed away from the ship into empty space. A large amount would still be absorbed by the ship itself and would no doubt cause substantial damage to the ship, but not necessarily enough to destroy it by vapourising it. Most metal objects survived in Hiroshima for example. Given the advanced tech here, they no doubt have equally advanced materials technology resistant to this sort of damage (as we indeed see throughout the series).
Probably the greatest threat to the ship would be via electro-magnetic disruption of its sensors and communications, disruption of flight ops, and destruction of unarmoured critical weapons systems exposed on the ship's surface.
Star Trek uses Warp Drive which moves objects into subspace while in FTL before entering normal space time again. It's never been very accurate which is why they always jump into a star system and then use impulse drive to maneuver to a planet. This renders it useless for weaponry.
Babylon 5 FTL is done by jumping through hyperspace gateways, this would be an utterly useless delivery mechanism for any munitions.
Star Wars hyperspace functions much like supspace does in Star Trek, though they appear to be able to pinpoint their destinations much better. It might work here.
BTW, why was it in BSG that ships could shrug off hits from nukes?
In this universe, they do eyeball it!
I want to see a Warhammer 40k show since 40k has the biggest ships in fiction.
Um, Star Wars ships are significantly larger than 40k vessels. To the point of Star Wars looking absurd - Snopes new ship is 60km in length, whereas an Apocalypse class imperial battleship is under 4km.
Star Wars ships have become really dumb in size.
This is only true with the Disney canon. With the previous canon (disregarding the EU and the Death Star), WH40k ships are almost always much larger. Even the smaller light cruisers in WH40k are three times as long as the Imperial Star Destroyer in Star Wars. Only the Super Star Destroyer is able to compete, depending on the source you rely on (according to Wookieepedia, sources state the SSD's length as being anywhere between 2200 meters and 19,000 meters. I remember it as being 7200 meters, which is on the larger side of WH40k ships).
This is only true with the Disney canon. With the previous canon (disregarding the EU and the Death Star), WH40k ships are almost always much larger. Even the smaller light cruisers in WH40k are three times as long as the Imperial Star Destroyer in Star Wars. Only the Super Star Destroyer is able to compete, depending on the source you rely on (according to Wookieepedia, sources state the SSD's length as being anywhere between 2200 meters and 19,000 meters. I remember it as being 7200 meters, which is on the larger side of WH40k ships).
What an insane hail of bullets. Even crazier when you realize the tracers are only one out of every five.
Anything from Legend of the Galactic Heroes.
The opening chapter of Iain M. Banks Excession, but the payoff is at the end of the book. But you'll be glad.
Ship battles often start at distances of tens of thousands of kilometers, way before anyone can acquire visuals. If they get close enough to see each other, it's usually because one or both parties are preparing boarding actions (a necessity if you want to capture a ship since its internal systems can be extremely unstable if hit by ship weaponry)
...
Humans take care of the targeting since computers are considered heresy, so weapons can be quite inaccurate (sometimes compensating by impacting enormous areas of space).
Seems to be no Kindle version, and I'm overseas at the moment. How is the Culture Series?
Serenity
I love this series, but the battles had a lot of missed potential. I was too 2d for a 3-dimensional battlefield.
When? I don't remember anything like that. Warp Drive doesn't remove an object from normal space, it just creates a bubble of normal space around a ship and that bubble is then accelerated to FTL within normal space, so warp speed collisions can occur.In star trek a ship has warped through objects to escape an object without any damage to said object.
hehe. WH 40k seem to be so stylized or with so much fantasy roots that they can surely get away with not having any excuse to have battles with ships this close to one another. Cool that they give some, but you don't need any when you are visual as cool as the Warhammer universe.
When? I don't remember anything like that. Warp Drive doesn't remove an object from normal space so warp speed collisions can occur.
Like most things in 40k the answer to these sorts of things are "it depends".Um, Star Wars ships are significantly larger than 40k vessels. To the point of Star Wars looking absurd - Snopes new ship is 60km in length, whereas an Apocalypse class imperial battleship is under 4km.
Star Wars ships have become really dumb in size.
I'll always argue against the space battles of Rogue One, simply because the big ships warp in...then sit there and do nothing. It's awful on re-watches especially noticing you never see them shoot any big guns or anything. It frustrates me just because I love big space battles and was letdown at not seeing them do anything. I was expecting some awesome stuff like the example already given here:
Space Battleship Yamato 2199 has amazing battles.