Langdon Alger
Banned
Holy crap, I forgot about Uncharted 4. I hate the game, but it's graphics are mind-blowingly good.
For a game going for photo realistic graphics that's a good thing!!!Personally I think it's also super boring looking because it looks like an actual photo. Snooze.
Damn that's gorgeous, how was the world though ? Was it empty?I have to say it again:
Xenoblade X looks completely nuts if you consider that it is running on a WiiU.
I still can't believe that Xenox X's gigantic world (one of the biggest ever) is actually truelyone world which requires no loading.
once you get thejaws will drop regulary.flight mode
unbelievable
![]()
![]()
![]()
Damn that's gorgeous, how was the world though ? Was it empty?
Frame-rate is horrible, which knocks it out of the running for me. It does LOOK nice, though.Surprised at not much mention of Until Dawn.
It certainly has best looking Peter Stormare.
Well this thread isn't best performing game of the generation so far.Frame-rate is horrible, which knocks it out of the running for me. It does LOOK nice, though.
Killzone. To me, still the best looking game out there to this day.
...but it is about the most technically impressive games, right? Frame-rate is part of that discussion.Well this thread isn't best performing game of the generation so far.
But the frame rate never bothered me in Until Dawn anyway.
No. Though the last few pages seem to have run with that. OP specifically didn't mean technically impressive....but it is about the most technically impressive games, right?
I've never been so glad to be wrong on GAF! After numerous similar threads eventually devolved into fanboy duel, I'm glad this thread is still rational and interesting.Oh, God, that title. Fanboy wars and hyperbolic posts abound!
The OP was initially referring to art style, but later clarified that "best looking" can be interpreted in any way by anyone....but it is about the most technically impressive games, right? Frame-rate is part of that discussion.
Killzone Shadowfall still holds up. Still in my top five PS4 games for visuals.
Damn that's gorgeous, how was the world though ? Was it empty?
![]()
Bloodborne is ridiculously a good looking game... the atmosphere and the art direction is the absolute one of the best I've ever seen, BB2 would look stunning and mind blowing if it was ever made.
Damn that's gorgeous, how was the world though ? Was it empty?
It's the single best open world ever developed in my opinion. It isn't vastly populated but it's not meant to be. Its an alien world full of monsters and awe inspiring views, the game is all about exploring and discovering the secrets of plant Mira. Game of the year 2015 for me.
Are there any good guides for this game yet? When I played it I didn't really have a clue what I was doing or where to go.
Uncharted 4, The Order, Until Dawn, Driveclub and The Division all look bonkers still.
I think Until Dawn has the best character models I've ever seen.
How? Both of these games look really dated in terms of rendering tech and asset quality.Most games I thought of have already been mentioned, but I still think a few deserve repeat:
Project Zero Maiden of Black Water
Bayonetta 2
One of these games is not like the others....
seriously The Division looks like garbage even on PC 4K downsampled. The console versions barely even pass for current gen.
Defnitive answer imo is Driveclub. Even years after I sold my PS4, my much stronger PC has yet to show me a racing game that looks as good as Driveclub. Horizon 3 doesn't even come close (and runs like shit to boot)
How? Both of these games look really dated in terms of rendering tech and asset quality.
There are very few games, let alone open world games, with the sheer asset density of the division. Let alone the straight up obsessive attention to little details., Note that video includes half of the details noticed by players. How anyone could look at the snow storms with dynamically lit particle effects and think it wouldn't pass for current gen is beyond me.One of these games is not like the others....
seriously The Division looks like garbage even on PC 4K downsampled. The console versions barely even pass for current gen.
Defnitive answer imo is Driveclub. Even years after I sold my PS4, my much stronger PC has yet to show me a racing game that looks as good as Driveclub. Horizon 3 doesn't even come close (and runs like shit to boot)
I mean art aside, those two games still aren't very technically impressive. Like the AA solutions have a lot of jaggies, character animation is really not where it should be, this is supposed to be fear and shock...Can't disagree more, Bayonetta 2 has some gorgeous art and there are moments where it simply looks stunning
Maiden of Blackwater also looks great with some of the best character models on Wii U and one of the most eerie environments ever put into a game.
There are very few games, let alone open world games, with the sheer asset density of the division. Let alone the straight up obsessive attention to little details., Note that video includes half of the details noticed by players. How anyone could look at the snow storms with dynamically lit particle effects and think it wouldn't pass for current gen is beyond me.
I mean it's a technical thread, you wanna highlight specifically what looks bad about it? Like is there something wrong with the volumetric particle effects? No, is the lighting system below par, absolutely no, is there a lack of attention to detail or lots of dead areas, (congrats on finding one of the emptiest looking spots btw, way to ignore the other three screens on this same page lol), no, I didn't even highlight how ridiculously detailed the interiors are, the scale of the buildings, the dynamic shaders for snow depending on TOD and weather. It's absolutely technical impressive in every sense of the word.It's too bad that "sheer asset density" doesn't make a bad looking game look good. Instead you see shades of shit most of the time like this
Seriously wish posts like this were moderated more often, because it's gamefaqs level fucking shitposting. Seriously. Sign up for that website if this is the level of discourse you prefer because I tried to have a discussion about, GASPPPPP, the technical specifics of a ubisoft game and used actual sources and facts instead of braindead phrasing likeI should have known better criticizing a Ubisoft game in a thread Yves is posting in.
in a thread about game tech.looks like garbage