LQX
Member
This monster is in Modern Warfare 2. I hate/fear it and love it at the same time.Noisepurge said:The awesome Atchisson Auto Assault-12 (AA12)
![]()
This monster is in Modern Warfare 2. I hate/fear it and love it at the same time.Noisepurge said:The awesome Atchisson Auto Assault-12 (AA12)
![]()
firehawk12 said:Horrible, horrible film... with shitty direction (what's with the CLOSE UPS every other scene?) and terrible writing (someone tried to rip off Tarantino and failed).
Even the money shot action scenes were pretty boring to watch. Too bad.![]()
The Take Out Bandit said:You know, I actually enjoyed that aspect of the movie.
This movie and Rambo have eschewed the 80's formula of badass team inserts into war zone and is picked off one by one until only the star remains. I appreciate this because in a movie like Predator I loved all the characters, but they all had to die.
It's good to see everybody make it out alive.
As for Gunnar they establish him early on as a drug user and a risk; but this is where the maturity of story comes in IMO, and Barney forgives Gunnar instead of outright killing him.
How many friends do you know that are douchebags, but are still your friends?
I dunno. I may be over thinking it, but I really dig it.
Is being good the point? Wish I saw the movie so I could get a better understanding of what you mean but isn't this movie supposed to be cheese and camp? Maybe it just doesn't nail that but I always figured this movie would awesome in the vain of "Scully, remember when I said I would kill you last? I LIED."commish said:I am the biggest Sly fan on the block, and I've been waiting 2 years for this movie. I have to agree, there were WAY too many closeups. So weird. The writing was pretty terrible and awkward (that scene with Arnold made me cringe) and, at times, completely nonsenical. While I didn't go see the movie for the story, there really is no excuse for having such a weak one. He went back for a girl he knew for 5 minutes? Really? There was also NO chemistry between the actors. None. Rambo was better at this.
That said, I still enjoyed the movie, as did my friends and seemingly most people in the theater. It's fun and has some great action sequences. Sly is just capable of a bit more in the writing and directing areas.
_Bro said:Is being good the point? Wish I saw the movie so I could get a better understanding of what you mean but isn't this movie supposed to be cheese and camp? Maybe it just doesn't nail that but I always figured this movie would awesome in the vain of "Scully, remember when I said I would kill you last? I LIED."
You clearly do not watch MMA at all. It was obvious from the initial casting that with a huge wrestling star and a huge MMA fighter, that they would ultimately be put up against each other on screen...ToyMachine228 said:The one Expendable that beats Steve Austin in a fight makes no sense. Stallone and Austin have sort of a rivalry going and the expendable that no one knows fights and kills him? OK...Bad choice there.
Because Austin was cast as the heel.Revolutionary said:You clearly do not watch MMA at all. It was obvious from the initial casting that with a huge wrestling star and a huge MMA fighter, that they would ultimately be put up against each other on screen...and that MMA would come out victorious
saw XPENDABLES last night.... um, so like - it was sposed to be - so they... uhhh
JASON and TERRY deliver though
was bruce willis cgi generated in expendables?
Expendable. said:
Bleepey said:And to think people think you are a troll!
JASON and TERRY deliver though
Expendable. said:
G-Fex said:
The Take Out Bandit said:Eh?
Star studded?
Only to die hard or B-grade action flick fans. A lot of these guys haven't been in the spotlight for ages. Statham's position is questionable as he's Hollywood Al Qaida, releasing bombs in American theaters on a regular basis.
Anyhow, yeah - I'd say Rourke is the only cast member to be a "big star" by today's standards; the rest is complete MAN SERVICE. I jizzed my pants when I sawname in the opening credits, and honestly not many folks know who he is, even fans of HK flicks.Gary Daniels
The Take Out Bandit said:Only to die hard or B-grade action flick fans
Oh, they should get Piper for the sequel. And then have a twenty minute fight scene in an alley with him.Dreams-Visions said:
I left with more hair on my chest.DOO13ER said:What a fucking final act, goddamn.
I left the theater with a full beard.
Dreams-Visions said:
Oh, Richard Norton would be bad ass. Gimme some Cynthia Rothrock too. Jackie is a long shot, so they should get Yuen Bao and Sammo Hung.The Take Out Bandit said::lol
I have much love for this cast; but I'm not going to mince words here.
The sequel needs some Richard Norton, Steven Segal, Mark Dacascos, and it would be awesome if Stallone could get Jackie Chan in there. <3
PhoncipleBone said:Oh, Richard Norton would be bad ass. Gimme some Cynthia Rothrock too. Jackie is a long shot, so they should get Yuen Bao and Sammo Hung.
After seeing it for the 3rd time, I realized I had grown another ball.PhoncipleBone said:I left with more hair on my chest.
Marvie_3 said:After seeing it for the 3rd time, I realized I had grown another ball.
Expendable. said:The movie wasn't laughably bad. It was just utterly boring. The first 2/3rds was just a string of meaningless conversations.
natedog4000 said:http://movies.yahoo.com/news/movies.reuters.com/sylvester-stallone-talks-expendables-sequel-reuters
Q. HAVE YOU WRITTEN A SCRIPT FOR A SEQUEL TO "THE EXPENDABLES"?
Stallone: It's plotted out in my mind's eye. I believe this group has to continue to evolve; it just can't become the same people. So how do you get new people introduced into the group, and how do you have some of the other people leaving? Those are the challenges.
Sean said:I hope there's not a complete cast reboot. I feel like most of the characters weren't used to their full potential so I'd like to see them continue with the current lineup. Can get rid of Randy Couture though IMO.
It'd be pretty epic if Stallone could get Chuck Norris on board, even if it's only for a brief cameo. Just get Chuck to recite a Chuck Norris Fact or something and the internet would go fucking nuts.
depths20XX said:I went into this movie having not seen any trailers or hearing much about it. It was just a really bad movie all around. Even from an action standpoint it failed. The entire final action sequence takes place at night and looks like total shit. Not even sure why Mickey Rourke was in this. Others like Couture and Austin just feel out of place. Didn't even have any good one liners or cheese. This really wasn't a good tribute to 80's action movies.
elwes said:Watching Stallone interact with Statham was like watching an oiled up pug trying to hump an exercise ball.