Keavy_Rain
Member
I'm having strange dreams with A LOT of not so subtle sexual undertones. It's really annoying :lol
That appears to be normal. I have had incredibly vivid sex dreams at least once a week since starting.
I'm having strange dreams with A LOT of not so subtle sexual undertones. It's really annoying :lol
Day 70 and it's easy now. Of course, it helped that i started this the day i began dating a girl, so i guess i was kinda cheating.
But even when im alone for a couple of days i feel no urge to watch porn or even masturbate, so i think i've defeated it. Not that im being particularly productive in those days, but at least im working my way through my backlog of games. Also, i see way more pretty girls everywhere, but im not sure if its because the weather has been really nice or because i stopped looking at porn. :lol
I should try this. If I go like 10 days I start to notice how I actually feel more emotions than just anger and lazy, haha. I'll see people with kids and think the kids are adorable, stuff like that.
Then one fap session and BAM, palette clean. Kids awful. Bingo bango, haha.
But I wonder how liberating it would be to go a month or more without porn and have actual human emotions.
Alright, cool. Had some really strange ones and I honestly for maybe the first time ever, really couldn't tell the difference between reality and dream. I may have broken my streak, I just don't know :lolThat appears to be normal. I have had incredibly vivid sex dreams at least once a week since starting.
Had a wet dream after only five days. I almost forgot how much I hate those. Still going strong, though.
I actually enjoy them. When I have them I have sexy dreams and then wake up mid-orgasm.
This...so much this. There is some unhealthy random shit tacked on that for some reason people are buying into.I really think /r/nofap, and to a lesser extent this thread, are missing the point of Wilson's hypothesis and may even be detrimental in the long run.
/r/nofap specifically has almost entirely misinterpreted Wilson's point (to abstain from porn due to its capacity for addictive behavior) and turned it instead into a crusade against masturbation in general, porn-assisted or not.
Even this thread leans towards that direction, with everyone concerned with not masturbating and barely discussing the porn component.
What /r/nofap is encouraging isn't recovery from porn 'addiction', it's a mindset that masturbation is a highly detrimental and shameful activity.
I'm kinda watching this from the outside in because I find it fascinating, but that's not the impression I get at all.I really think /r/nofap, and to a lesser extent this thread, are missing the point of Wilson's hypothesis and may even be detrimental in the long run.
/r/nofap specifically has almost entirely misinterpreted Wilson's point (to abstain from porn due to its capacity for addictive behavior) and turned it instead into a crusade against masturbation in general, porn-assisted or not.
Even this thread leans towards that direction, with everyone concerned with not masturbating and barely discussing the porn component.
What /r/nofap is encouraging isn't recovery from porn 'addiction', it's a mindset that masturbation is a highly detrimental and shameful activity.
Then one fap session and BAM, palette clean. Kids awful. Bingo bango, haha.
But I wonder how liberating it would be to go a month or more without porn and have actual human emotions.
I really think /r/nofap, and to a lesser extent this thread, are missing the point of Wilson's hypothesis and may even be detrimental in the long run.
/r/nofap specifically has almost entirely misinterpreted Wilson's point (to abstain from porn due to its capacity for addictive behavior) and turned it instead into a crusade against masturbation in general, porn-assisted or not.
Even this thread leans towards that direction, with everyone concerned with not masturbating and barely discussing the porn component.
What /r/nofap is encouraging isn't recovery from porn 'addiction', it's a mindset that masturbation is a highly detrimental and shameful activity.
finally cleared 10 days again
i'll prolly fuck up today or tomorrow like usual after postin in here lol
oh well, 10 down, 90 to go, hopefully
Then don't.I'm almost 30 days in, but I don't think i'll ever give it up completely.
NO STIMULATIONWhat about erotic stories? Can we use those as stimulation?
Or they're Naked Snake and picking up dudes.
HI GUYS MY NAME IS JARATE AND I DIDN'T READ LOL
I keep mis-assuming because nobody in their right mind would want to watch gay porn anyway. It's universally terrible.Fixed again!
I'm a dude who likes dudes yo.
Yes, it is a period of 90 days with no porn, no masturbation and (if it can be avoided) no orgasm. It is 'reset' the dopamine receptors in your brain for arousal.http://www.reddit.com/r/nofap
Isn't this program specifically designed around not masterbating to visual stigma, or even masterbating for a while?
I'm sorry I'm not willing to read 31 pages of people talking about their masterbation.
I keep mis-assuming because nobody in their right mind would want to watch gay porn anyway. It's universally terrible.
I'd have thought gay guys wouldn't have this problem!
Home grown porn is always better. Unless you mean professionally. In which case I'm not a fan of your industry I'm yet to come across man-man porn I find anywhere near as pleasing as I find me-man reality.I don't only watch gay porn (well, used to)... I make it.
Your opinion is invalid.
I keep mis-assuming because nobody in their right mind would want to watch gay porn anyway. It's universally terrible.
I'd have thought gay guys wouldn't have this problem!
Yes, it is a period of 90 days with no porn, no masturbation and (if it can be avoided) no orgasm. It is 'reset' the dopamine receptors in your brain for arousal.
True facts of this:
1 - It works. See: success stories.
2 - You can resume non-extreme pornographic consumption afterwards.
3 - It's only been 16 pages by any sensible metric.
4 - Even going by your weird 31 count, if you're not willing to read, don't bother posting. You don't even need to read the entire thing to see your point had been made before and was ill-judged then, too.
They weren't built for internet porn either, but such is the situation we're in.Not orgasming for 90 days is not healthy. Humans were not built for that.
They weren't built for internet porn either, but such is the situation we're in.
Stop comparing this to weight loss. Go to YourBrainOnPorn and watch the educational videos.
This post is just one giant "didn't read lol", even after you've asked for sources and explanations and have been provided.Actually humans were built to be attracted to sexual acts, and porn is merely a sexual act in viewable form
The problem is the amount of access to the porn we have leads to over stimulation, and excess of anything is unhealthy, especially when it comes to sex.
And I will keep up my food analogy. Food and orgasm both produce pleasure, and are easily available, and also both are wide scale problems with regards to excess. There aren't specific parts in your brain that get addicted to things, addiction lies in your pleasure centers, and both things produce pleasure that gets you addicted.
Hell we've been making porn since we were cavemen
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/15/s...-female-anatomy.html?_r=2&emc=tnt&tntemail1=y
This post is just one giant "didn't read lol", even after you've asked for sources and explanations and have been provided.
Actually humans were built to be attracted to sexual acts, and porn is merely a sexual act in viewable form
Ah yes, 'biotruths'.We've seen success stories for, fad diets, and those success stories are usually short term. Also, it can work, but it's not the most healthy thing
Not orgasming for 90 days is not healthy. Humans were not built for that.
The source I provided. And the thread that lists stuff from the source multiple times.Explain to me then what I didn't read.
Ah yes, 'biotruths'.
The source I provided. And the thread that lists stuff from the source multiple times.
I know this for fact because you keep bringing up points fully addressed by the source.
And it's not that you're disagreeing with the source, either. You're genuinely raising these things as if they've never once been raised.
So, yeah. This will be the last time I respond to you until you do your homework.