• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

The HD Movie thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
NekoFever said:
No they're not. Off the top of my head, Monsters Inc is the only Pixar movie currently on BD that's not 2.35:1.
Really? Both Wall-E and Up are 16:9 for me and I don't see any option for other display modes. I have my TV set to it's 1:1 pixel mode.
 
Why are people so upset over aspect ratios? Can't you just change your tv aspect ratio if you want to cut off the part of the picture the director wants you to see if you hate it so bad?
 
Zaraki_Kenpachi said:
Why are people so upset over aspect ratios? Can't you just change your tv aspect ratio if you want to cut off the part of the picture the director wants you to see if you hate it so bad?

I just want to watch a film on every inch of my expensive TV - I don't give two shits about what the "director wants".

Edit: I know that makes me sound like a prick, but I've had to show so many people how to zoom the picture on their new DVDs because they think they're TVs broken - the "director's intention" speech doesn't fly with the majority of people.
 
McBacon said:
I just want to watch a film on every inch of my expensive TV - I don't give two shits about what the "director wants".

Exaclty, I remember when widescreen became popular, it made sense having everything wide and didn't mind black border. Then I bought a widescreen TV and I get no blackborders (or forced stretching), but a few years later I see films that are extra wide which brings back the shitty black borders.
 
How did I miss the news about the Fallen Angels blu-ray March release date?

143773-d1.jpg
 
KAL2006 said:
Exaclty, I remember when widescreen became popular, it made sense having everything wide and didn't mind black border. Then I bought a widescreen TV and I get no blackborders (or forced stretching), but a few years later I see films that are extra wide which brings back the shitty black borders.
"Extra wide" films aren't a new thing. They've been around far longer than widescreen TV and haven't suddenly appeared in the last few years.

Hell, there's a film about Napoleon from 1927 that was shot in 4:1, which would look like this on a widescreen TV:

2mqknqh.jpg


But anyway, it's 1am here and the black bar tards are out - must be a full moon or something - so I'm going to bed.
 
McBacon said:
I just want to watch a film on every inch of my expensive TV - I don't give two shits about what the "director wants".

Edit: I know that makes me sound like a prick, but I've had to show so many people how to zoom the picture on their new DVDs because they think they're TVs broken - the "director's intention" speech doesn't fly with the majority of people.

Look at Junglebook in widescreen and tell me that where they crop the top and bottom so you lose people's arms to make fake wide screen so that it "uses every inch of my expensive TV". I don't see how other people not understanding a reason for you to do it.
NekoFever said:
"Extra wide" films aren't a new thing. They've been around far longer than widescreen TV and haven't suddenly appeared in the last few years.

Hell, there's a film about Napoleon from 1927 that was shot in 4:1, which would look like this on a widescreen TV:

2mqknqh.jpg


But anyway, it's 1am here and the black bar tards are out - must be a full moon or something - so I'm going to bed.
:lol What a piece of shit. It's you "full screen tards" who started this by bitching for no reason out of the blue. Dumbass.
 
Zaraki_Kenpachi said:
:lol What a piece of shit. It's you "full screen tards" who started this by bitching for no reason out of the blue. Dumbass.
Wait, what? I'm on your side! Friendly fire!

Black bar tards are the ones who complain about the black bars. I'd be complaining if they weren't there when they're supposed to be.

Now I really am going to bed.
 
Not Friendly Fire! Fuck! :(

On another topic, does anyone remember what The Prisoner was before it being on sale now or the website to check prices over time? I don't really have $50 but if it's cheap I'd be more willing to try and swing it.
 
Zaraki_Kenpachi said:
Not Friendly Fire! Fuck! :(

On another topic, does anyone remember what The Prisoner was before it being on sale now or the website to check prices over time? I don't really have $50 but if it's cheap I'd be more willing to try and swing it.


i paid £50 for it so it is cheaper then that, does the US version come with the book?
 
Kowak said:
i paid £50 for it so it is cheaper then that, does the US version come with the book?

I don't know but it just looks like a box set so I'm going to say no? The box looks bigger for the UK but that might just be deceiving whether it has the book.
 
Kowak said:
i paid £50 for it so it is cheaper then that, does the US version come with the book?

No. You guys get the cooler edition. I did get mine for $40 right around its release date, though, so I really can't complain.
 
Best Buy prices starting tmrw:

New Releases

Gamer $22.99
Weeds Season 5 $25.99
Whiteout $19.99
The Invention Of Lying $19.99
Smokin' Aces 1&2 Combo Pack (BBY Exclusive) $29.99
Smokin' Aces 2 $24.99
Bourne Identity $17.99
Bourne Supremacy $17.99
Bourne Ultimatum $17.99

$16.99

Inglourious Basterds
Star Trek
Transformers 2 : Revenge Of The Fallen
Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian
The Ugly Truth

$19.99

Public Enemies
Pelham 123
Family Guy: Something, Something, Something Darkside
Bruno
Funny People
500 Days Of Summer
All About Steve
Ice Age : Dawn Of The Dinosaurs

------------------------

Definitely picking up Star Trek and 500 Days of Summer.
 
CajoleJuice said:
Are you sure you're not looking at the DVD set? That's what's 49.99. Yes, more than the Blu-ray set.

theprisoner.jpg

O fuck, you're right. I just assumed the bluray was the first result and it was more expensive. Wow, good thing you proved me wrong, I was about to buy the dvd by accident. :lol
 
I just got a Blu-ray player, and was checking out the release lists for the next few months.

The Lord of the Rings got me excited, then I saw it's the fucking THEATRICAL editions? What in the fuck?
 
cjelly said:
I just got a Blu-ray player, and was checking out the release lists for the next few months.

The Lord of the Rings got me excited, then I saw it's the fucking THEATRICAL editions? What in the fuck?

yeah i posted a couple days ago, Peter Jackson said that Warner are just money grabbing fucks, release theatrical and then release the extended next year to hopefully get people to double dip. i have since decided to wait till the extended cut version next year. but might double dip on the hobbit/lotr boxset in a few years.
 
On the Extended Edition, I want the option to watch Theatrical Cut - like on the Gladiator BD. I consider the theatrical cut to be the definitive cut of FOTR; it's the one that I fell in love with all those years ago. Dwarf love? Voice-overs? Pfft.
 
I also think there's something to be said for the theatrical versions. I like the EEs as a fan of the books, but they do have some things that I don't like as much, and I've always enjoyed the theatrical cuts as well because they were how I originally saw things. That's why I'm going to buy this set anyway, assuming that it has top-notch AV, because I still have and have watched both versions of the DVDs.

It's pretty clear that the EEs are being held back until it's time to start up the hype train for The Hobbit. The first part's not out until the end of 2011, though, so there could be quite a wait.
 
distantmantra said:
How did I miss the news about the Fallen Angels blu-ray March release date?

143773-d1.jpg
I'm assuming this is an import? My love for early Wong Kar Wai knows no bounds, but damn if importing all these overseas Blurays isn't hard on the wallet :(
 
shagg_187 said:
Question: Beside the obvious price difference (no different via amazon but indeed a difference when buying in stores) and different boxart, What's the difference between Criterion's bluray release of Che and Paradox's bluray release of Che?

http://www.amazon.ca/dp/B002U6DVNU/
http://www.amazon.ca/dp/B002OHROKG/
I want to say that the Criterion version is the US version since it is the only Blu-Ray version available. I'm not sure what that means for the special features. They may be different than the Criterion edition.
 
FnordChan said:
I have no idea, but considering the extras available on Criterion's edition, I'd just go with that when it was released. While there occasional exceptions, the Criterion edition is usually a sure-fire bet over other editions of a film available.

FnordChan

Criterion is indeed the best-bet but according to the back of the box, Paradox edition has "over 70 minutes of bonus features" or something. Ugh, complicated!
 
Did netflix underestimate the holiday blu Ray player sales? I know they've always sucked on BD availability, but it's getting ridiculous now. You just can't get any new releases. My top 14 movies are all red.
 
VanMardigan said:
Did netflix underestimate the holiday blu Ray player sales? I know they've always sucked on BD availability, but it's getting ridiculous now. You just can't get any new releases. My top 14 movies are all red.

Yeah it's really pissing me off. I have 12 movies in wait. WTF am I paying extra for if everything that I want is unavailable?
 
DanielPlainview said:
Yeah, it's terrible :( Except, I did get Che right when it came out from them!


did you ever get around to watching pride and predujice? This review made the jump in visual quality seem huge over the original dvd version.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom