dinazimmerman
Incurious Bastard
This might be old news to many, but I had never heard of it.
The Hispanic Paradox: U.S. Hispanics Live Longer, Despite Socio-Economic Hurdles
Data on Hispanic Immigrants Presents Puzzle on Aging
This is very interesting to me, because we usually assume that socioeconomic variables like access to health care, level of education, and income almost fully determine one's life expectancy. But for a lot of Hispanics, that really isn't the case. A lot of them live long, happy lives and prove themselves to be resilient in the face of chronic diseases, despite scoring low on all these socioeconomic measures. This is even stranger because Latin Americans living in their native countries aren't very healthy on average.
Could it be that familialism and religiousness, major parts of Hispanic culture, are actually good for your health? If Latin American countries weren't so poor and dangerous (high crime and violence rates lowering life expectancy rates), would the positive effects of these cultural features really stand out?
The Hispanic Paradox: U.S. Hispanics Live Longer, Despite Socio-Economic Hurdles
http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/editors_picks/2009/7/7/the_hispanic_paradox_us_hispanics_live.htm said:When it comes to Hispanics and health care, the horror stories are well known. Less so is the mysterious phenomenon known as the "Hispanic Paradox."
Again and again, we hear that the Hispanic population is disproportionately beset by the bugbears of poverty, obesity, Type 2 diabetes and lack of access to quality health coverage and insurance.
These unfortunate facts are indisputable. But what many people don't realize is that, when it comes to the bottom line -- that is, mortality -- the news for Hispanics is good. Very good.
In the United States, Hispanics, despite their socio-economic hurdles, on average live longer than blacks by seven years, and whites by five years, says Dr. David Hayes-Bautista, a professor of medicine at UCLA.
"There's something about being Latino that is good for their health," Hayes-Bautista told HispanicBusiness.com, adding wryly: "Just think if we had access to health care."
Widely known as the "Hispanic Paradox," the phenomenon was discovered and coined by researchers decades ago.
At the time, many scientists were skeptical, speculating that the data must have been skewed. They hypothesized that immigrants who came to the United States were simply younger and healthier than the average American, or that a large share of older immigrants returned home to die.
But recent studies have refuted the doubting theories, and the science community today generally accepts the Hispanic Paradox as real.
Data on Hispanic Immigrants Presents Puzzle on Aging
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/03/science/03ageside.html said:If medical researchers were to pick someone who might defy national life expectancy statistics, few would pick Irma Lara.
She came to this country illegally from a small town in Mexico to work as a baby sitter. She was 26, had only a first-grade education and was desperately poor.
She married a Mexican-American and had seven children. Her husbands meager salary at a cotton compress company was never enough. The family had no health insurance, never saw a dentist. Now, widowed at 75, Mrs. Lara is still poor; her monthly income is less than $600. She spends her days at a community center near her tidy subsidized apartment in Hitchcock, Tex., playing bingo, learning English, working out with exercise bands and with weights.
I am happy, Mrs. Lara said.
And, if statistics are any guide, Mrs. Lara has a long life ahead of her, longer than would be expected if she were black or a native-born white woman. It is called the Hispanic paradox, and it is one of the most puzzling discoveries in research on aging.
For example, a recent analysis by Irma T. Elo, a demographer at the University of Pennsylvania, indicates that a 65-year-old white woman will live, on average, an additional 18.9 years. But a 65-year-old Hispanic woman who immigrated to the United States will live an additional 19.8 years, a significant difference.
The longevity difference persists even though Hispanic immigrants tend to be like Mrs. Lara, poor and poorly educated and lacking health care. It persists even though, like Mrs. Lara, they get chronic diseases like arthritis and high blood pressure and are often overweight.
This is very interesting to me, because we usually assume that socioeconomic variables like access to health care, level of education, and income almost fully determine one's life expectancy. But for a lot of Hispanics, that really isn't the case. A lot of them live long, happy lives and prove themselves to be resilient in the face of chronic diseases, despite scoring low on all these socioeconomic measures. This is even stranger because Latin Americans living in their native countries aren't very healthy on average.
Could it be that familialism and religiousness, major parts of Hispanic culture, are actually good for your health? If Latin American countries weren't so poor and dangerous (high crime and violence rates lowering life expectancy rates), would the positive effects of these cultural features really stand out?