• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

The most misused GIF on the internet

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted by mrkgoo

Haven't seen Citizen Kane, but I think gifs like that aren't meant to allude to the context that it was used in the movie, just the face value appearance of it.

This...

Originally Posted by Juicy Bob

You could say that he looks angry, but without context you could just as easily think he's applauding in furious agreement or approval of something.

...aaaaaaaand this.

That's how i see it too. Same with some other gifs where people make strange faces or emotions. People take them and post them how they think they fit. Do they always know the Movie they are from and the intention of the scene? Don't think so.
 
I don't think anyone is being chastised for misusing the gif, it's just misused more than any other that's all. This is the post-modern era, where appropriation is a legitimate basis for expression. I'm not sure why people are falling all over themselves to justify something which doesn't require justification.
 
I don't think anyone is being chastised for misusing the gif, it's just misused more than any other that's all. This is the post-modern era, where appropriation is a legitimate basis for expression. I'm not sure why people are falling all over themselves to justify something which doesn't require justification.
Is your avatar depressing because he looks despondent and broken, or is it hopeful because he's just spotted the blue flower that will lead to his recovery?

I think context does matter.
 
I don't think anyone is being chastised for misusing the gif, it's just misused more than any other that's all. This is the post-modern era, where appropriation is a legitimate basis for expression. I'm not sure why people are falling all over themselves to justify something which doesn't require justification.
I think it's because the OP attempts to declare definitively that "this is what it means" when clearly that's not how everyone interprets it.

I, for one, always interpreted the image as "furious agreement", so it's interesting to see people get a negative connotation from it.
 
This one.

giphy.gif


It should only be used by men after producing a fart that lasts 14 seconds and changes pitch at least 3 times.
 
Is your avatar depressing because he looks despondent and broken, or is it hopeful because he's just spotted the blue flower that will lead to his recovery?

I think context does matter.

Neither,
the blue flower is just evidence that Substance D is being made by New Path. His recovery will never happen, but at least he can give the authorities evidence that New Path have been making Substance D all along.

Context is important, but that goes both ways. When things are given alternate contexts, the juxtaposition of the new usage with the intended one becomes a reflection of the people or person creating that new context.
 
It's actually a satisfied man who is going to be fucking miserable in about 30 minutes. WHY CAN'T WE USE THE GIF IN THE RIGHT CONTEXT?!

But now you are assuming context. A gif is a wonderful few seconds of motion, and should be taken as such. Where it comes from matters not at all. If the preceding and succeeding contexts were taken into account for every GIF, it would be a sad lonely life for the one or two gifs that made the grade.
 
Wow...there goes my backup movie

citizen-kane-clapping.jpg


Thuogh regarding the topic:
GIFs are (most of the time) not about the context of the movie or whatever they're from.
It's about the content of the GIF and only the GIF itself.

Like that Lord of the Rings example up there, it's only about the sentence he says. What happens after that in the movie is irrelevant.
It's like you guys never used reaction GIFs before! :(
 
Citizen Kane is so over rated. Or maybe it's so highly rated it became a nauseating cliche even as I was taking film theory classes.
 
while not misused, that fucking 'i understood this reference' gif in all it's forms, especially the tumblr uglified one is a crime against humanity. I wish I could round up everyone that uses it and have them shot. When used 100% correctly - congrats you're not adding anything to the conversation, when the tumblr version is used - congrats you just blinded everyone with eyesight.

fuck off with this shit brehs.

3ffWf.gif


/couldn't resist, sorry
 
Thuogh regarding the topic:
GIFs are (most of the time) not about the context of the movie or whatever they're from.
It's about the content of the GIF and only the GIF itself.

Like that Lord of the Rings example up there, it's only about the sentence he says. What happens after that in the movie is irrelevant.
It's like you guys never used reaction GIFs before! :(

technically_correct_futurama.gif
 
I suppose it's ironic that many/most who use the clapping gif don't understand the original context.

On the other hand I don't think changing the context of a clip for comedic value automatically makes it a misuse.
 
Cillian Murphy taking off Pixeled Shades gif is one I don't understand at all....I know the scene from Batman Begins....he's getting fed up with Falcone trying to blackmail him for something he doesn't fully understand what hes getting into, so he takes off his glasses to put his mask on....but I don't get what the pixels shades and "Can't deal with this" means...
 
Cillian Murphy taking off Pixeled Shades gif is one I don't understand at all....I know the scene from Batman Begins....he's getting fed up with Falcone trying to blackmail him for something he doesn't fully understand what hes getting into, so he takes off his glasses to put his mask on....but I don't get what the pixels shades and "Can't deal with this" means...

It's a subversion of the "deal with it" meme, where pixel shades descend onto someone's face.

he's taking them off because he can't "deal with it"

The trick is to not overthink these memes. Most people only use them in the most base, referential way, as the Citizen Kane example shows.
 
post-25067-And-Here-We-Go-Joker-gif-Imgur-x71M.gif


This is the most misused gif ever.

Nothing happens after the Joker says that.

Wait...are we talking "misuse" in the context of "this is where this GIF is originally from"?

I don't think a GIF necessarily has to be used in the same way that it's being used in its source material. As long as it makes sense when it's being used, that should be fine. "And. Here. We. Go!", i.e. "I can tell that a shitstorm is about to erupt."
 
I haven't seen Citizen Kane, but I was told it was a complicated situation where he was making an audience applaud his wife despite her being shit to make her feel good.

It is kind of this, but he is applauding to make applause happen because he's invested so much in his wife, who was terrible. It's stubborn pride, I suppose.
 
Well, usually the .gif are given new context, whatever the circumstances are. If the circumstance happens to give the .gif its original context, well, that's fine as well.

Just because a handful of people know or don't know the original context, does not make it misused. And if a lot o people use a gif with a guy clapping angrily to congratulate, then most people will think it is a guy congratulating someone, including myself.
 
Gifs cannot be misused because they're entirely dependant on the context of the conversation within which they've been used. The source of any gif is irrelevant to its meaning.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom