Now I'm a Sony fanboy. :lolrage1973 said:Yes because we saw so much innovative game play for White Knight and FFXIII. Keep your fanboyism out of the thread and judge each game on its own merit.
Now I'm a Sony fanboy. :lolrage1973 said:Yes because we saw so much innovative game play for White Knight and FFXIII. Keep your fanboyism out of the thread and judge each game on its own merit.
Terrell said:Your analysis of the 7-second clip that's been released is astounding.
rage1973 said:Yes because we saw so much innovative game play for White Knight and FFXIII. Keep your fanboyism out of the thread and judge each game on its own merit.
rage1973 said:Yes because we saw so much innovative game play for White Knight and FFXIII. Keep your fanboyism out of the thread and judge each game on its own merit.
Hellgate, Neverwinter Nights 2, Witcher, Mage Knight Apocalypse, Gothic 3, etc
If the developer says it's a RPG, who are you to argue based on 4 seconds of video and a screenshot?
Amir0x said:uhm, maybe you didn't know... but DQ Swords is a product that you can buy today if you want. This is supposedly a game from that series. Now, unless they have a big departure - which is what I'm inquiring - what makes it an RPG?
No, speculation and observation of the 5 second clip show that it will play similarly in basic regards though. The game obviously has a much higher budget and isn't a small scale project like Kenshin DQ was (since it mainly reused assets from old DQ games).Scalemail Ted said:Is DQS really just Kenshin Dragon Quest?
Scalemail Ted said:Is DQS really just Kenshin Dragon Quest?
A Black Falcon said:There is no real definition of "RPG". It means "any game that someone decides to put the label on" pretty much... I mean, if everything from Gauntlet to Ogre Battle and Final Fantasy Tactics can be called an "RPG"... either that's one really broad genre, or there are some pretty fuzzy genre definitions going on there... and I think the latter. It is a broad genre, but I'm not so sure it's THAT broad...
ethelred said:No, since that game wasn't made by Horii and DQS is, but don't let that disuade Ami.
Amir0x said:What the hell does who it's MADE by have to do with anything? It's titled Dragon Quest Swords: The Masked Queen and the Tower of Mirrors. Judging by the short clip and the title, we can gain that it at least takes heavily from the legacy of that title. If you're gonna come back with a dumbshit sarcastic remark, at least have something better to back your shit up then who it is made by. "It's made by Horii, which must mean it's different!"
Scalemail Ted said:Bah! I'm expecting them to put in some sword swiping but I hope thats not all it is. Im keeping my fingers crossed.
Sword Swiping will replace the "Attack" command, it's our basic attack. Other then that we don't know how the system works.Scalemail Ted said:Bah! I'm expecting them to put in some sword swiping but I hope thats not all it is. Im keeping my fingers crossed.
You really think with Horii on the title making the project much bigger than some Plug & Play TV game that DQS will be the same on-rails simple sword swiping game on every level game?Amir0x said:It very well might be! That's why I was asking, instead of getting the typical combative response from ethelred trying to be clever.
IF it was a more high budget version of DQ Swords, then it still wouldn't be an RPG. Read up on what it's like here. According to IGN who talked to a SquareEnix representative, the Wii game will be a sequel to the above
Amir0x said:It very well might be! That's why I was asking, instead of getting the typical combative response from ethelred trying to be clever.
jj984jj said:You really think with Horii on the title making the project much bigger than some Plug & Play TV game that DQS will be the same on-rails simple sword swiping game on every level game?
jj984jj said:You really think with Horii on the title making the project much bigger than some Plug & Play TV game that DQS will be the same on-rails simple sword swiping game on every level game?
ethelred said:at you accusing others of being combative.
Oh god, not this again. Ogre Battle and FFT are RPGs (sRPGs to be particular). Let it go!
Scalemail Ted said:Heh... maybe it can be a true "action" rpg.
If the video is any indication that at least the battles will expand upon Kenshin DQ then it will definitely be an RPG since you can use spells in Kenshin DQ and such to defeat monsters as well and at the end of the battle you will collect loot to buy new stuff, etc. Kenshin DQ already had many RPG elements in place and a bigger project could easily turn the basic gameplay into a full fledged RPG.Amir0x said:I'm sure the project will be MUCH bigger than that Plug&Play shit. Being bigger != suddenly an RPG.
jj984jj said:If the video is any indication that at least the battles will expand upon Kenshin DQ then it will definitely be an RPG since you can use spells in Kenshin DQ and such to defeat monsters as well and at the end of the battle you will collect loot to buy new stuff, etc. Kenshin DQ already had many RPG elements in place and a bigger project could easily turn the basic gameplay into a full fledged RPG.
Scalemail Ted said:When is DQS launching, and why is S-E so secretive with the title? BTW, what team/group is developing this?
ethelred said:Like I said:
1. The game was first revealed at E3 2005 during Iwata's speech, right around the same time as Camelot began advertising for and did an interview stating that they were working on an untitled RPG for the Wii.
2. Famitsu said that DQS was being developed by a company that usually does games published by Nintendo, such as Genius Sonority (who's actually doing Pokemon Wii) or Camelot.
3. The game gets delayed right as Camelot is exiting the console development business.
Scalemail Ted said::-(
So it may become Vaporware?
ethelred said:No, it's not vaporware -- they just showed it again two weeks ago. In all likelihood, DQS was Camelot's RPG. When Camelot dropped off the project to start making PC golf games, that caused the delay from their original launch intentions, and they had to find someone else to finish it up.
Okay now that is stretching waaaaaaaaaaay to far. For all we know it could be Artoon.ethelred said:Like I said:
1. The game was first revealed at E3 2005 during Iwata's speech, right around the same time as Camelot began advertising for and did an interview stating that they were working on an untitled RPG for the Wii.
2. Famitsu said that DQS was being developed by a company that usually does games published by Nintendo, such as Genius Sonority (who's actually doing Pokemon Wii) or Camelot.
3. The game gets delayed right as Camelot is exiting the console development business.
jj984jj said:Okay now that is stretching waaaaaaaaaaay to far. For all we know it could be Artoon.
Square Enix executive producer Yuu Miyake did comment on the appeal of the "simplicity" inherent in the design of the Wii, which may give you a clue as to the design direction the team will be taking with the game. Since the Wii is due out this fall, you can presumably expect to see Dragon Quest Swords day-and-date with the launch of the system.
jj984jj said:Okay now that is stretching waaaaaaaaaaay to far. For all we know it could be Artoon.
yup;icecream said:Wasn't Ziria announced for US already, sometime around E3?
[source: http://www.rpgfan.com/news/2006/1247.html ]E3 2006: Hudson Announces Far East of Eden: Ziria & Others
...announcement of Tengai Makyo: Ziria (Far East of Eden: Ziria) for North American release on Microsoft's Xbox 360. Recently released in Japan to the elation of fans, Hudson plans for an impeccable localization of this charismatic title, though no release date is available at this time.
I don't remember where I read it, but someone stated that there is not going to be more info. on Fable 2. for awhile.. but still, quite a few RPGs with potential to look forward toKyanMehwulfe said:Hopefully we get some Fable II goodness at the event today.
How about some online play details for the game. I want to team up with and compete with other heroes in the game online...and against AIs offline.KyanMehwulfe said:Hopefully we get some Fable II goodness at the event today.
Environment screenshots in the least, perhaps some city ecology, and a PC port release date in an effort to further prove their dedication to revitializing PC gaming - that'd be nice.
jj984jj said:Did you not watch the videos?
Or Amir0x's overraction to the White Knight video? :lol
What's wrong with the question? BD and LO do look like the standard RPG, which is fine, but are the same people who are complaining about "boring and dated" turn-based RPGs really anticipating these games more than the new type of system we're seeing in FFXIII and WK?
djtiesto said:Wait, I think I might have missed something... is there gonna be anything different with regards to FF13's battle system? Because I always thought the devs said it was gonna be your standard ATB system with flashier/more cinematic attacks.
Zalasta said:Since when has RPG been lacking in the current gen? If you are referring specifically to the X-Box and GC platform, then I'd agree, but on the PS2, there are still plenty of games scheduled for release in the coming months (at least 6 before the end of the year).
ethelred said:Honestly, I have to agree with Greenpanda -- this gen HAS lacked in the RPG department compared to the previous one. The PlayStation had a much stronger library of RPGs than the PS2, overall, and the Saturn had a waaaaay better library as a secondary RPG console than the GCN or Xbox did.
What, so she can say she won't buy any of this and wait until the next FF/DQ remake?TheJollyCorner said:this thread is useless without RedScarlet.