• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

The REAL February NBA Thread - Accept No Substitute

Status
Not open for further replies.
:lol @ the Lakers

kbryant.jpg


"An above .500 team?"

kobe.jpg


"Shit, they found my weakness!"
 
I hope Konex is watching this game so he can show me where all the "constant defensive pressure and double-teams" against Kobe are. :lol Dude hasn't been doubled once, either on the perimeter or in the post (where it would be easier to do). And this despite the fact that he's lighting them up. :lol
 
They feel they can just stick Tayshaun on him cos Rip is getting roasted. If that doesn't work, they will start to play him like they did in the finals...
 
Cloudy said:
They feel they can just stick Tayshaun on him cos Rip is getting roasted. If that doesn't work, they will start to play him like they did in the finals...

Err, they aren't doubling him when Rip is defending him, they aren't doubling him when Prince is playing him. Yeah, if he goes off for 40, they'll double him-- just like they would anyone who went off. :lol


EDIT: I mean, don't get me wrong-- they give "weak" help, like just then on the post-up, where Wallace put his arms up and came over halfway, but only after Kobe dribbled around for about 5 seconds (during which time he should've made his move-- but Kobe's not an efficient player like that :D). I guess I just don't see the defensive pressure that "no other star perimeter player gets" like everyone (read: everyone named Kobex :P) talks about.
 
Cloudy said:
Do you see the doubles now, Loki?

Only the half-assed one in the post-up area just before break (see my edit above). Catching at the foul line and having the next defender over waiting to help out if you drive isn't a "double team"-- it's solid team defense that's played against every good player.


EDIT: Yup, more sterling defensive pressure against Kobe. :lol Nobody else within 15 feet of him, even at the rim.
 
I don't even know how Detroit's up so much. Watching the game, it seems as though both teams are scoring at roughly the same rate. Nice half by Kobe-- 14 pts and 7 assists. Those were definitely all "Stackhouse Assists"®, though. ;) :D
 
LMAO @ the 3-second call against Hamilton and Tolbert's criticism of it despite the fact that Kobe was in the lane TWICE as long as Rip was earlier in the game and threw about 3 times as many pump fakes. :lol Gotta love it. :D


Hah, Kobe almost turns the ball over trying to be too cute with the dribble (like I said earlier), and is fortunate to get it back and find Mihm. Man, the refs are REALLY being patient with Rasheed Wallace-- they haven't T'ed him up despite his antics. Guess that one year of good behavior last season had some effect. :lol
 
:lol @ Kobe whining over that CLEAR foul.


Did I mention that I can't stand all his little "smiles" and "smirks"? :D


Man, Mihm is DESTROYING the Wallaces on the glass.
 
Where was the foul there? :lol It certainly wasn't after he went up for the shot. Maybe on the body...


If Kobe screams any more, they're gonna ask him to do a reenactment of that diner scene in "When Harry Met Sally"-- he'll be Sally. :D
 
Cloudy said:
WTF, Slava called for the ball then ran out of the way :(

Even his teammates know that Kobe doesn't give it up in the flow, so can you blame him? Stackhouse assists galore, though! :D ;)
 
Man, Ben was never big on offense, but they've been going to him less and less lately. I mean really, why go to him when Dice can post up AND shoots much much much better. Not to diss Ben, the man is a force, but he needs to work on his shooting more.
 
Loki said:
How in GOD'S NAME was that not a 3-second violation by Kobe? He head-faked like 27 times.

EDIT: And a phantom call against Rasheed on Kobe!

Loki said:
I hope Konex is watching this game so he can show me where all the "constant defensive pressure and double-teams" against Kobe are. Dude hasn't been doubled once, either on the perimeter or in the post (where it would be easier to do). And this despite the fact that he's lighting them up

Loki said:
I mean, don't get me wrong-- they give "weak" help, like just then on the post-up, where Wallace put his arms up and came over halfway, but only after Kobe dribbled around for about 5 seconds (during which time he should've made his move-- but Kobe's not an efficient player like that ). I guess I just don't see the defensive pressure that "no other star perimeter player gets" like everyone (read: everyone named Kobex :P) talks about.

Loki said:
Only the half-assed one in the post-up area just before break (see my edit above). Catching at the foul line and having the next defender over waiting to help out if you drive isn't a "double team"-- it's solid team defense that's played against every good player.


EDIT: Yup, more sterling defensive pressure against Kobe. Nobody else within 15 feet of him, even at the rim.

Loki said:
I don't even know how Detroit's up so much. Watching the game, it seems as though both teams are scoring at roughly the same rate. Nice half by Kobe-- 14 pts and 7 assists. Those were definitely all "Stackhouse Assists"®, though. ;)

Loki said:
Hah, Kobe almost turns the ball over trying to be too cute with the dribble (like I said earlier), and is fortunate to get it back and find Mihm. Man, the refs are REALLY being patient with Rasheed Wallace-- they haven't T'ed him up despite his antics. Guess that one year of good behavior last season had some effect.

Loki said:
@ Kobe whining over that CLEAR foul.


Did I mention that I can't stand all his little "smiles" and "smirks"?


Man, Mihm is DESTROYING the Wallaces on the glass.

Loki said:
If Kobe screams any more, they're gonna ask him to do a reenactment of that diner scene in "When Harry Met Sally"-- he'll be Sally.

Loki said:
Even his teammates know that Kobe doesn't give it up in the flow, so can you blame him? Stackhouse assists galore, though!

No wonder Kobe is shooting so horribly this season. He can't get the same elevation he used to with you hanging from his nuts like that.
 
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/cowbell/050225

Sports Guy on NBA trades

BARON DAVIS TO THE WARRIORS
I'm deferring to my Dad on this one: When I told him that the Celts were sniffing around about acquiring Davis this week, Dad said simply, "He's one of those guys who's always hurt."

"Yeah, but when he's healthy, he's one of the best points in the league, and he's a warrior-."

"What's his contract like?"

"Four years left at the max."

Silence on the other end. And then ...

"How old is he?"

"25."

"What were his injuries?"

"Blew out his knee in college, keeps having back problems."

"He's 25 and he has a bad knee AND a bad back? I think I'll pass."

(Throw in the fact that the Warriors are involved and I'm guessing this is going to end badly.)

NOBODY GOES FROM THE BLAZERS
Here's what they had last February: A playoff team with Rasheed and Miles expiring in 2004; Stoudamire and Dale Davis expiring in 2005; Randolph becoming an unrestricted free agent in 2005.

Here's what they have now: A lottery team with Ratliff signed for $45 million through 2008; Miles signed for six years, $48 million; Randolph signed for an $86 million extension that doesn't kick in until next season; $35 million in contracts (Stoudamire, Van Exel and Shareef) getting wiped off after this summer; and no cap space to sign a marquee guy. They should have to pay reparations to Blazers fans for everything that's happened over the past five years.

When Isiah called the Spurs and said, "We'll give you Nazr Mohammed, you give us Malik Rose and a crap No. 1, and we don't care about the $20 million difference in salaries," do you think Gregg Popovich said, "Lemme call you right back," then pretended he was deliberating about it for 30 secondsw before speed-dialing Isiah back? Was there laughter in the Spurs offices? High-fiving? Was Popovich the guy who called Isiah under the "Maybe Isiah will be dumb enough to give us a center" premise? How did this go down?

Could Isiah make a trade that surprised you anymore at this point? For instance, if you read that he traded Stephon Marbury to the Lakers for Brian Grant, Tierre Brown, a lottery-protected first-rounder and the rights to Magic Johnson's next comeback, would you even bat an eyelash? Me neither.

:lol :lol
 
Ninja Scooter said:
No wonder Kobe is shooting so horribly this season. He can't get the same elevation he used to with you hanging from his nuts like that.

:lol


I see that you can't handle criticism of your boy. :D Remember, Kobe can only shoot > 45% when his FGA's are almost equaled by his FTA's (as was the case tonight-- 12 FGA's? Pffft...:P ). 6 TO's? Kobe's not "butter"-- he's butterfingers! :D
 
I was wondering what number Antonie was gonna wear. I was hoping that he would have gotten his 8 back (employee number 8). But I think 88 looks pretty sweet.

So glad to see him back in Boston. Can't wait to see him do the wiggle. :)
 
The Hawks will Waive Payton and the Celtics will Resign him. Book it. If they do manage to get Walker and keep payton Ainge is a genius as that would mean they got Walker for a draft pick and some stiffs. And after watching Walker last night get 24 points and 10 boards in his debut this deal is looking good as the Celtics really needed an inside scorer and rebounder. They could be a dangerous team come playoff time with three big time scorers in Walker, Peirce, and Davis.
 
Ninja Scooter said:
No wonder Kobe is shooting so horribly this season. He can't get the same elevation he used to with you hanging from his nuts like that.

:lol

Loki is just pissed because he is in real danger of losing our bet. Kobe has already supassed the required 41%. I am nice guy though Loki and I am willing to let you off the hook.
 
bionic77 said:
:lol

Loki is just pissed because he is in real danger of losing our bet. Kobe has already supassed the required 48%. I am nice guy though Loki and I am willing to let you off the hook.

Fixed. :D Btw, he may, in fact, end up shooting better than 46% for the rest of the season, but based on his volume of shots (< 15 FGA per game, with nearly as many FT's as FGA's, which is the only way he can seem to shoot > 45%), his season % will still end up around 43-44%, not the 48% you insisted it would be.


BionicONWED. :D
 
Loki said:
Fixed. :D Btw, he may, in fact, end up shooting better than 46% for the rest of the season, but based on his volume of shots (< 15 FGA per game, with nearly as many FT's as FGA's, which is the only way he can seem to shoot > 45%), his season % will still end up around 43-44%, not the 48% you insisted it would be.


BionicONWED. :D

48% is pretty much impossible for Kobe to reach, just because of the subpar first half. He will end up at about 44-45% at the end of the season, which would be a decent season for Kobe. Good thing for me that we agreed on Kobe only shooting 41%. :D

P.S. Konex, please stop blaming Laker losses on every player other then Kobe. That is almost as annoying as Loki's blind hatred for Kobe. Great players can carry shitty teams to the playoffs by themselves. All the great players have done this in their careers. Duncan, Hakeem, and hell even David Robinson did it a few times. Kobe needs to lead a bad team to the playoffs, or else he really risks becoming the next Jordan. :lol
 
bionic77 said:
Kobe needs to lead a bad team to the playoffs, or else he really risks becoming the next Jordan. :lol

You do realize that Jordan led possibly the worst teams in history to the playoffs singlehandedly for four straight years, right? Even to the second round once. Alone. :P


Oh, and...48%. :D
 
Great players can carry shitty teams to the playoffs by themselves.

Of course they'll make the playoffs but when certain players are giving them nothing on either end of the court, I will bitch!! >_<
 
Loki said:
You do realize that Jordan led possibly the worst teams in history to the playoffs singlehandedly for four straight years, right? Even to the second round once. Alone. :P


Oh, and...48%. :D

Singlehandedly? Your insanity knows no bounds!

And he never did shit in the playoffs without Pippen. :D

P.S. I was refering to his embarassing failures with the Wizards whereas Pippen seemed to take the Blazers to the brink of another NBA championship.....

Hmm, who was really behind those rings?
pippen.jpg
 
Eminem said:
let's hope so.

DON'T THINK I DIDN'T SEE THAT DISPARAGING COMMENT ABOUT NOT PLAYING TONIGHT. YOU THINK THE BOBCATS ARE NOTHING? EMEKA OKAFOR IS GOING TO SHOW YOU WHO ROOKIE OF THE YEAR REALLY IS BOYEEE

*pants*

;p

Vgamer said:
The Hawks will Waive Payton and the Celtics will Resign him. Book it.

The Suns have expressed interest in picking up GP as a backup to Steve Nash. If the Hawks buy him out, don't count on him going back to the Celts. He's already expressed a desire to go back to the Western conference for a contender, and that is exactly what the Suns are.
 
bionic77 said:
Singlehandedly? Your insanity knows no bounds!

And he never did shit in the playoffs without Pippen. :D

P.S. I was refering to his embarassing failures with the Wizards whereas Pippen seemed to take the Blazers to the brink of another NBA championship.....

Hmm, who was really behind those rings?
pippen.jpg

Oh is that so? Let's examine these claims...


Jordan led one of the worst teams in history (actually "teams", because each year the players changed, negating any continuity) to the playoffs for four straight seasons ('84-'85 through '88-'89), including to the second round once (1988-89). As for your "Pippen" comment, please realize that Pippen (and Grant) didn't develop into competent players until midway through the '89-'90 season. Here are the stats for Pippen and Grant from '88-'89, which is when Jordan, averaging an NBA record 45.6 ppg against Cleveland in the first round, propelled them past the Cavs and into the conference semis against Detroit:


Pippen: 7.9 points, 3.8 rebounds, 2.1 assists per game

Grant: 7.7 points, 5.5 rebounds, .7 blocks per game


Now, how do Kobe's current teammates stack up? Let's compare Odom and Mihm's numbers this season to Pippen and Grant's #'s above:

Odom: 15.5 points, 10.3 rebounds, 3.5 assists per game

Mihm: 10.5 points, 6.9 rebounds, 1.6 blocks per game


Now then, who exactly "had/has more help" again, Kobe or Jordan? :lol So yeah, those years ('84-'85 until '89-'90), he did it singlehandedly.


As for Pippen's contributions to the Blazers, their team winning percentage went from .700 in '99 (without Pippen) to .719 the year Pippen joined the team, an increase of 1.9%; they went from 3rd in the West the year prior to Pippen's arrival to 2nd in the West with him, a jump of one spot in the standings. Also keep in mind that they also added Steve Smith and his 15 ppg, played Bonzi Wells in many more games that season (66 vs. 7 in '99), and Rasheed's game was also improving. Pippen's line for the '00 season was 12.5 points, 6.3 reb, and 5 ast. in 34 minutes per game.


Now, Jordan's Wizards improved their winning percentage from .231 to .451, an increase of 22% over the previous year without Jordan. In addition, they were 6th in the East at the All-Star break before Jordan hurt his knee and needed surgery after finishing in 14th place the year prior, a jump of 8 spots. And those Wizards didn't include any notable players like Rasheed Wallace, Steve Smith, Damon Stoudamire, and Arvydas Sabonis, as Pippen's Blazers did. Jordan's line for '01: 23 ppg, 5.7 reb, 5.2 ast in 35 minutes per game.


Now, in light of having been edumacated (sic) by yours truly :D, would you care to tell me again what sort of "impact" Pip had on the Blazers that Jordan did not more than equal on the Wizards (at age 39, no less-- 4 years older than Pip)? Because I just don't see it. This is not to say that Pippen was not a valuable contributor, either on those Blazer teams or (particularly) on the Chicago teams, because he certainly was-- in Chicago, he was the 40% to Jordan's 60%, which was incredible, considering. But in your quest to devalue Jordan's accomplishments and tarnish his legend, your blind hatred has led you astray; the facts are staring you right in the face above. For shame, bionic...for shame. :)


It must all be in your head-- then again, so many things are. ;) :P


For those who refuse to read all this, it can be summarized thusly: BionicOWNED. :D
 
Bowser said:
DON'T THINK I DIDN'T SEE THAT DISPARAGING COMMENT ABOUT NOT PLAYING TONIGHT. YOU THINK THE BOBCATS ARE NOTHING? EMEKA OKAFOR IS GOING TO SHOW YOU WHO ROOKIE OF THE YEAR REALLY IS BOYEEE

*pants*

;p

:lol :lol :lol actually, I seriously thought the Bulls had the day off. :lol
then i went to their website and was like shit, i better fix that.
 
Loki said:
Oh is that so? Let's examine these claims...


Jordan led one of the worst teams in history (actually "teams", because each year the players changed, negating any continuity) to the playoffs for four straight seasons ('84-'85 through '88-'89), including to the second round once (1988-89). As for your "Pippen" comment, please realize that Pippen (and Grant) didn't develop into competent players until midway through the '89-'90 season. Here are the stats for Pippen and Grant from '88-'89, which is when Jordan, averaging an NBA record 45.6 ppg against Cleveland in the first round, propelled them past the Cavs and into the conference semis against Detroit:


Pippen: 7.9 points, 3.8 rebounds, 2.1 assists per game

Grant: 7.7 points, 5.5 rebounds, .7 blocks per game


Now, how do Kobe's current teammates stack up? Let's compare Odom and Mihm's numbers this season to Pippen and Grant's #'s above:

Odom: 15.5 points, 10.3 rebounds, 3.5 assists per game

Mihm: 10.5 points, 6.9 rebounds, 1.6 blocks per game


Now then, who exactly "had/has more help" again, Kobe or Jordan? :lol As for Pippen's contributions to the Blazers, their team winning percentage went from .700 in '99 (without Pippen) to .719 the year Pippen joined the team, an increase of 1.9%; they went from 3rd in the West the year prior to Pippen's arrival to 2nd in the West with him, a jump of one spot in the standings. Also keep in mind that they also added Steve Smith and his 15 ppg, played Bonzi Wells in many more games that season (66 vs. 7 in '99), and Rasheed's game was also improving. Pippen's line for the '00 season was 12.5 points, 6.3 reb, and 5 ast. in 34 minutes per game.


Now, Jordan's Wizards improved their winning percentage from .231 to .451, an increase of 22% over the previous year without Jordan. In addition, they were 6th in the East at the All-Star break before Jordan hurt his knee and needed surgery after finishing in 14th place the year prior, a jump of 8 spots. And those Wizards didn't include any notable players like Rasheed Wallace, Steve Smith, Damon Stoudamire, and Arvydas Sabonis, as Pippen's Blazers did. Jordan's line for '01: 23 ppg, 5.7 reb, 5.2 ast in 35 minutes per game.


Now, in light of having been edumacated (sic) by yours truly :D, would you care to tell me again what sort of "impact" Pip had on the Blazers that Jordan did not more than equal on the Wizards (at age 39, no less-- 4 years older than Pip)? Because I just don't see it. This is not to say that Pippen was not a valuable contributor, either on those Blazer teams or (particularly) on the Chicago teams, because he certainly was-- in Chicago, he was the 40% to Jordan's 60%, which was incredible, considering. But in your quest to devalue Jordan's accomplishments and tarnish his legend, your blind hatred has led you astray; the facts are staring you right in the face above. For shame, bionic...for shame. :)


It must all be in your head-- then again, so many things are. ;) :P


For those who refuse to read all this, it can be summarized thusly: BionicOWNED. :D

Oh man, I knew it was coming

Calm%20Before%20the%20Storm.jpg
 
Loki said:
Oh is that so? Let's examine these claims...


Jordan led one of the worst teams in history (actually "teams", because each year the players changed, negating any continuity) to the playoffs for four straight seasons ('84-'85 through '88-'89), including to the second round once (1988-89). As for your "Pippen" comment, please realize that Pippen (and Grant) didn't develop into competent players until midway through the '89-'90 season. Here are the stats for Pippen and Grant from '88-'89, which is when Jordan, averaging an NBA record 45.6 ppg against Cleveland in the first round, propelled them past the Cavs and into the conference semis against Detroit:


Pippen: 7.9 points, 3.8 rebounds, 2.1 assists per game

Grant: 7.7 points, 5.5 rebounds, .7 blocks per game


Now, how do Kobe's current teammates stack up? Let's compare Odom and Mihm's numbers this season to Pippen and Grant's #'s above:

Odom: 15.5 points, 10.3 rebounds, 3.5 assists per game

Mihm: 10.5 points, 6.9 rebounds, 1.6 blocks per game


Now then, who exactly "had/has more help" again, Kobe or Jordan? :lol So yeah, those years ('84-'85 until '89-'90), he did it singlehandedly.


As for Pippen's contributions to the Blazers, their team winning percentage went from .700 in '99 (without Pippen) to .719 the year Pippen joined the team, an increase of 1.9%; they went from 3rd in the West the year prior to Pippen's arrival to 2nd in the West with him, a jump of one spot in the standings. Also keep in mind that they also added Steve Smith and his 15 ppg, played Bonzi Wells in many more games that season (66 vs. 7 in '99), and Rasheed's game was also improving. Pippen's line for the '00 season was 12.5 points, 6.3 reb, and 5 ast. in 34 minutes per game.


Now, Jordan's Wizards improved their winning percentage from .231 to .451, an increase of 22% over the previous year without Jordan. In addition, they were 6th in the East at the All-Star break before Jordan hurt his knee and needed surgery after finishing in 14th place the year prior, a jump of 8 spots. And those Wizards didn't include any notable players like Rasheed Wallace, Steve Smith, Damon Stoudamire, and Arvydas Sabonis, as Pippen's Blazers did. Jordan's line for '01: 23 ppg, 5.7 reb, 5.2 ast in 35 minutes per game.


Now, in light of having been edumacated (sic) by yours truly :D, would you care to tell me again what sort of "impact" Pip had on the Blazers that Jordan did not more than equal on the Wizards (at age 39, no less-- 4 years older than Pip)? Because I just don't see it. This is not to say that Pippen was not a valuable contributor, either on those Blazer teams or (particularly) on the Chicago teams, because he certainly was-- in Chicago, he was the 40% to Jordan's 60%, which was incredible, considering. But in your quest to devalue Jordan's accomplishments and tarnish his legend, your blind hatred has led you astray; the facts are staring you right in the face above. For shame, bionic...for shame. :)


It must all be in your head-- then again, so many things are. ;) :P


For those who refuse to read all this, it can be summarized thusly: BionicOWNED. :D

No ownage has occured. That was damage control to make Konex look proud. I don't need to look at your devil statistics to know that Jordan didn't actually win anything until Pippen was there. And it is hard for other players to score any points when a ballhog is hoisting up so many shots per game.

MJ had his chance to show how we would do without Pippen and Phil, as I remember things (and this is usually the most accurate record of the way things actually occured), the Wizards were a huge joke and even gave up like 80 points to a certain Jellybean Bryant in the first quarter. I guess Jordan just couldn't play championship caliber defense without Pippen to bail him out......
 
as I remember things (and this is usually the most accurate record of the way things actually occured)

Everything bionic says after this should be STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD! We all know bionic also believes the NBA went through a lockout period between 1991-1993 and 1996-1999
 
bionic77 said:
No ownage has occured.

Ownage has certainly occurred. :P

I don't need to look at your devil statistics to know that Jordan didn't actually win anything until Pippen was there.

Rings? Of course not-- no player can win rings by themselves. But he did lead the Bulls to the playoffs for four consecutive seasons, including to the second round once, singlehandedly (as shown, this was before Pippen or Grant developed into competent players). After all, the quote of mine that you were originally responding to was the one stating that he did just that.


And it is hard for other players to score any points when a ballhog is hoisting up so many shots per game.

Jordan's average # of shot attempts during the 4 seasons in question? 23 per game (while playing with nobody of any significance). Kobe's average # of shot attempts during the Lakers dynasty? 22 per game-- and that was while playing alongside the most dominant offensive force in the game. Jordan's FG% during those years: 52.5%; Kobe FG% during the Laker run: 46.1%. Who's the "ball hogger" again? :lol


as I remember things (and this is usually the most accurate record of the way things actually occured)

Obscure mental disorder GET! :D

the Wizards were a huge joke and even gave up like 80 points to a certain Jellybean Bryant in the first quarter. I guess Jordan just couldn't play championship caliber defense without Pippen to bail him out......

Wiz with a 40 year old Jordan and a worse supporting cast than Kobe has were playing far better (and had a far better record) than Kobe's Lakers this season. Sucks to not have the facts on your side, doesn't it? :P And Jordan at age 40 obviously couldn't (and didn't) guard Kobe that game, Stackhouse did-- it's amusing that Kobe whores constantly have to point to the one amazing game Kobe had, the one game where he dropped 40+ in a half (and against a shitty defender, at that), whereas MJ dropped 40+ in one half 5 times in his career.


But I guess they have to do that because they can't point to the # of 50+ point games (39 for MJ vs. 5 for Kobe), 40+ point games (240 vs. ~40 for Kobe), scoring titles (10 vs. 0), rings (6 vs. 3), rings as "the man" on the team (6 vs. 0), Finals MVP (6 vs.-- you guessed it-- 0), season MVP's (5 vs...OMG...0), defensive player of the year awards (1 vs....get outta town! 0), first-team selections (10 vs. 3), defensive first-team selections (9 vs. 3-- and three questionable selections, at that), career scoring average (30.2 vs. 22.6), steals titles (3 vs. OMG goose eggs...0), career FG% (51% vs. 45%), seasons over 2 steals/game (10 vs. 1), first-place finishes in efficiency rankings (7 vs.-- I see a trend!-- 0), finishes in the top 2 in the efficiency rankings (10 vs...da-dum...0), seasons with the most total points in the league (11 vs. 1), Olympic gold medals (2 vs. 0), playoff scoring average (33.5 ppg vs. 22.6 ppg) etc. etc. etc.


You get the picture. :)


Loki: Putting bionic in his place since 2003. :D
 
Loki said:
Ownage has certainly occurred. :P



Rings? Of course not-- no player can win rings by themselves. But he did lead the Bulls to the playoffs for four consecutive seasons, including to the second round once, singlehandedly (as shown, this was before Pippen or Grant developed into competent players). After all, the quote of mine that you were originally responding to was the one stating that he did just that.




Jordan's average # of shot attempts during the 4 seasons in question? 23 per game (while playing with nobody of significance). Kobe's average # of shot attempts during the Lakers dynasty? 22 per game-- and that was while playing alongside the most dominant offensive force in the game. Jordan's FG% during those years: 52.5%; Kobe FG% during the Laker run: 46.1%. Who's the "ball hogger" again? :lol




Obscure mental disorder GET! :D



Wiz with a 40 year old Jordan and a worse supporting cast than Kobe has were playing far better (and had a far better record) than Kobe's Lakers this season. Sucks to not have the facts on your side, doesn't it? :P And Jordan at age 40 obviously couldn't (and didn't) guard Kobe that game, Stackhouse did-- it's amusing that Kobe whores constantly have to point to the one amazing game Kobe had, the one game where he dropped 40+ in a half (and against a shitty defender, at that), whereas MJ dropped 40+ in one half 5 times in his career.


But I guess they have to do that because they can't point to the # of 50+ point games (39 for MJ vs. 5 for Kobe), 40+ point games (240 vs. ~40 for Kobe), scoring titles (10 vs. 0), rings (6 vs. 3), rings as "the man" on the team (6 vs. 0), Finals MVP (6 vs.-- you guessed it-- 0), season MVP's (5 vs....OMG...0), defensive player of the year awards (1 vs....get outta town! 0), first-team selections (10 vs. 3), defensive first-team selections (9 vs. 3-- and three spurious ones, at that), career scoring average (30.2 vs. 22.6), steals titles (3 vs. OMG goose eggs...0), career FG% (51% vs. 45%), seasons over 2 steals/game (10 vs. 1), first-place finishes in efficiency rankings (7 vs.-- I see a trend!-- 0), seasons with the most total points in the league (11 vs. 1), Olympic gold medals (2 vs. 0), playoff scoring average (33.5 ppg vs. 22.6 ppg) etc. etc. etc.


You get the picture. :)


Loki: Putting bionic in his place since 2003. :D


daaamn.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom