And then we better wait for E3 2016 before calling it dead.after that wait till TGS before calling it dead though
After all the hype that would make no sense in my opinion
lol you guys are so gullible
you'll see this e3
lol you guys are so gullible
you'll see this e3
Name change, The Last Guardian has too much baggage and negativity associated with it
Could they be renaming the game?
Name change, The Last Guardian has too much baggage and negativity associated with it
Name change, The Last Guardian has too much baggage and negativity associated with it
- Square was still releasing other games.
Didn't Ueada say development was going well in December?
They wanted to leave any connection to FF 13 behind, so that makes sense.Versus 13 did it, so can TLG.
Didn't Ueada say development was going well in December?
The wanted to leave any connection to FF 13 behind, so that makes sense.
With Last Guardian they'd sort of lose all the "It's THE Last Guardian" buzz.
So was Sony Japan Studio, which Team ICO is only a small part of.
It takes around six months for a trademark to be abandoned if the owner/applicant doesnt file a Request for Extension of Time to file SOU. I find it unlikely that someone just forgets about trademark maintenance for six months.Isn't it always possible that someone there screwed up and forgot to renew the trademark?
Note: The previous application, trademark U.S. serial number 77750563, was also abandoned before all extension requests had been used. This news doesn't bode well for the future of this game however.
Is he a pathological liar?Didn't Ueada say development was going well in December?
Surprised the sunhilegend the thing gifs haven't been posted when this happened before.
lol what? The only baggage and negativity is people mad it's not out.
It makes no sense to change the name unless they're changing the entire concept.
And no a single game is not at all comparable to Versus where they simply made a spinoff into a mainline game.
The negativity is entirely based on people wanting the game and not getting to have it. Changing the name won't change the fact that it was in development hell. People who have negative feelings because of that will still have them regardless of a name change. And then there are the low-information consumers don't know it has baggage in the first place, so the name doesn't matter.
Maybe the game really has changed fundamentally and requires a name change for that reason, but I'm not holding my breath.
Rösti;152305298 said:It takes around six months for a trademark to be abandoned if the owner/applicant doesnt file a Request for Extension of Time to file SOU. I find it unlikely that someone just forgets about trademark maintenance for six months.
Hahahahahah woooowwww
You got some 'splaining to do Yoshida
That makes no sense Y2Kev, why would they keep an IP that has no value whatsoever, and then keep lying and disappointing fans to keep that privilege.
I know you have many sources, and jokes aside, you have been probably right all along about this. But I fail to see the logic.
I mean, I suppose it would make sense if the game is so different now that calling it Last Guardian wouldn't make sense anymore, but I'm not sure what that would look like.Oh, right. I didn't think of that way.