Snowman Prophet of Doom
Member
Substance said:Now I'll maintain my eagerness to call out Pitt for not being as y'know fascinating as Bana in Chopper (after all I wanted to sway all the big talk to him) though I certainly don't see my criticism as solely a whinge on the disparity of their modes of expression, 'outward' 'reflective'. It's just good old fashioned tools of appreciating acting here such as: the credibility of their emotional volatility, the mannerisms and ideas which intrigue the viewer to follow, observation/insight etc etc. It all prevails to how the actor is inhabiting the character.
It's been a while since you wrote this, but I'd like to point out that, being an actor myself, I simply disagree wholeheartedly with your assessment of Pitt's performance. I don't want to say that you 'missed the point' because that is so often the safe haven of people unable to take criticism of things they like; rather, I'll say that you've simply misjudged the performance completely and speak of acting in terms that are simply not used by folks in the trade, at least none that I've known.
"The credibility of their emotional volatility" - An overly verbose way of judging how believable an actor's emotions are. Indeed, there is never a sense that Pitt's emotions in Jesse James are anything shy of believable and 100% committed.
"The mannerisms and ideas which intrigue the viewer to follow" - This reads like an incomplete thought, but I can point to a few idiosyncrasies (his blinking slightly too much, the way that his jaw has a slight stiffness/underbite, the coldness of his gaze) which 'intrigue' me as a viewer to follow him; he simply commands the screen whenever he is on it.
"Observation/insight" - If you don't see observation and insight in Pitt's performance, I'm not sure where you would ever see it.
"Inhabiting the character" - This is actually a part of the standard set of criteria by which to judge a performance, but I challenge you to look at the previously posted picture of Pitt in Jesse James in this thread and tell me that you see even an inch of Pitt in that picture. In terms of inhabiting characters, Brad Pitt is simply one of the best working today, whether it's in drama or comedy. He, like Clooney, hearkens back to the Henry Fonda and James Stewart types, leading men with a strong personality and star power who could still be counted on to commit fully to their roles and to turn in fantastic, varied work each time.
Edit: and swoon, yeah, Malick definitely could change the language of cinema, easily. He's simply one of the all-time great film artists, no question.