You do have some pretty weak taste in games. You like Tobin, so that's a plus, but wow.permutated said:Uh...yeah they do man, that's mostly what they do.
GTA: San Andreas and all PSP counter parts.
Bully (seriously, come on).
Table Tennis: AKA the GTA 4 graphics demo.
Midnight Club: possibly the worst racing series on the gaming market.
To say that they don't make shitty games is...incredibly false. I don't think they're a bad developer, or incapable of producing good games, but most of their products are incredibly boring and useless.
Mutagenic said:You do have some pretty weak taste in games. You like Tobin, so that's a plus, but wow.
I just think it's weird. We all know you hate the games, but you continue to post in this thread, almost as if you're trying to convert others. I know everyone is allowed to post in here, but I'm surprised you continue to. If I don't like a game, I want to stay the hell away from the game's thread. =Ppermutated said:I don't like sandbox games, except of course for Crackdown, and I'm looking forward to prototype.
I've never been a fan of Rockstar's work, so many people like them for being controversial, I'd rather have good gameplay mechanics.
Because of people like you, I will RETRACT my previous statement. I think that the games are unappealing, but I understand why some people enjoy them.
Amon Tobin kicks ass.
Mutagenic said:I just think it's weird. We all know you hate the games, but you continue to post in this thread, almost as if you're trying to convert others. I know everyone is allowed to post in here, but I'm surprised you continue to. If I don't like a game, I want to stay the hell away from the game's thread. =P
Nah it's fine really. I'm not in this thread much anyways. I do have my own issues with the game, but I'd say that for most fans of the genre, GTA IV is upper-tier.permutated said:Lol, I would DEFINITELY agree with you if this wasn't a "things we don't like about a certain game" thread, I find that as reason to stay and nit pick.
If you seriously want me to leave, I will, you seem like a nice enough guy and I don't want to bother you further.
The Leaf stuff no, but Bonobo yes. Ninja Tune back in the day...Coldcut, DJ Food, Funki Porcini, among others. All right, back to the regularly scheduled GTA bash-a-thon.permutated said:PM'd you with music reccom's though.
Call it what you like - I'm not saying it's a good thing. I'm saying from their perspective I can see the logic. They're dealing with creating a whole new engine and making everything work. They have to limit complexity somewhere to get it out in a somewhat reasonable timeframe.permutated said:I'm sorry man, I think that's the stupidest logic I've heard in a long time. There's no reason the cool new features that were well received by the public should be taken out of future releases. Makes no sense.
Salmonax said:Call it what you like - I'm not saying it's a good thing. I'm saying from their perspective I can see the logic. They're dealing with creating a whole new engine and making everything work. They have to limit complexity somewhere to get it out in a somewhat reasonable timeframe.
I'm sure, like last generation, we'll see a slew of cool new features in the game or games to come in this generation. And I'd similarly bet that they'll start the next generation with a much more realistic game that lacks many features we've come to know and love.
They are pressured by Take Two (especially the company being in the situation its in). I'm sure the next GTA will have all the missed features as well as additional ones. There's so much extra content packed into this game that I don't see the reason to complain anyways. And when's the last time Nintendo, Capcom, or Valve release a game this massive?Leondexter said:There are top-tier studios out there whose release schedule is "when it's done", like id, Valve, and sometimes Nintendo and Capcom. Rockstar should be able to afford to be in this club, since they made three 15-million-selling games last gen, and this game has always been a guaranteed multi-million-seller on day 1.
Ashhong said:the stupid driving. handling is too hard imo.
Cragen said:I really dislike some of the game play stuff, like some missions are really bad since they havn't made it possible to use the somewhat buggy cover system so you end up just looking around like a headless chicken while you just lose all your armor and health.
He means that nobody told the level/mission designers that there would be a cover system. Some shootout scenarios simply don't offer viable cover.Darunia said:what do you mean by this
McBradders said:Why isn't my car in the center of the screen? Why is it off to the right?
Why haven't they fixed the controls issue?
![]()
Ledsen said:According to a GTA apologist on another forum, it's their "fix" for having the camera too low to see what's in front of you :lol :lol :lol
Ledsen said:According to a GTA apologist on another forum, it's their "fix" for having the camera too low to see what's in front of you :lol :lol :lol
Brashnir said:this is incorrect. The reason is that the camera centers on Niko rather than on the car. Motorcycles are in the center of the screen for the same reason.
oldschlgmr said:Not being able to buy property is one of my biggest problems with this game. You get all this cash and nothing rewarding to spend it on with the exception of guns. There just isn't a feeling of moving up in the world that the older games had either which is another major disappointment. Tell you the truth the game doesn't feel finished to me, I think they left a lot of stuff out. I bet the expansion (or DLC) will address most of these issues though. Not that I'll be able to enjoy it anyway, since I only have a PS3 and not a 360. I wouldn't pay for that crap anyway even if I did own a 360, it's insulting.
Bottom line, great game, but they held a lot of stuff back from it for the DLC IMO.
Ledsen said:I know it's not the real reason, I was just pointing out how stupid some people can be when defending weird design decisions![]()
McBradders said:I think the PS3 will get it all on a disc further down the line.
oldschlgmr said:Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that DLC exclusive to 360? If PS3 does get it, it won't be for a long time and that sucks because I bet that's the other half of the original game right there.
HK-47 said:There is a reason MS paid $50 million for it.
Yeah right before GTA 5 is released.McBradders said:Downloadable.
Rockstar aren't stupid, they are gonna want to sell this shit to everyone who bought the game. 360 gets downloads, PS3 gets a disc somewhere down the line.
YOU SEE IF I'M WRONG.
MoogPaul said:here's another bug in the game that can destroy your save file.
While driving around on my motorcycle, Roman gives me a call and lets me know we got an apartment in Algonquin. Before the conversation is over, a cop car plows into me and I get thrown off the bike. This immediately ends the conversation with Roman, making the new safehouse not appear. I had to load from my previous save.
This happened to me a second time while getting the first call from Ray, causing the Ray icon on my map to not show up and I wasn't able to pick up missions from him. I had to load from my previous save.
MoogPaul said:here's another bug in the game that can destroy your save file.
While driving around on my motorcycle, Roman gives me a call and lets me know we got an apartment in Algonquin. Before the conversation is over, a cop car plows into me and I get thrown off the bike. This immediately ends the conversation with Roman, making the new safehouse not appear. I had to load from my previous save.
This happened to me a second time while getting the first call from Ray, causing the Ray icon on my map to not show up and I wasn't able to pick up missions from him. I had to load from my previous save.
Darunia said:Personally I never get these driving complaints. After 5 minutes of getting used to, they were second nature to me. Maybe it's because I don't have a long history playing other 3D gta's and I have no preset expectations when it comes to that aspect.
Driving is easy as can be: let go of the gas in turns, press left trigger to brake a bit, continue. I only use hand brake to do a 180 in cop chases or when I need to brake abruptly.
I only have a couple of hours of playing III and VC as a reference point, but I like the driving mechanics in IV much much more.
the key word is shouldn't, but alas, it does notSpirit of Jazz said:Shouldn't the said person call you up a little later if that's the case?
The thing that really gets me about this is that the main essence of this game is driving from point A to point B, and it should be really easy.Kintaro said:Then you sit there wondering why the hell you have to work around the driving mechanics.
Hollywood Duo said:The thing that really gets me about this is that the main essence of this game is driving from point A to point B, and it should be really easy.
Easiest way is the stupid slowmo action cam.:lolGhost said:It is easy once you get used to the changes, I found driving on the bonnet cam was the best way.