gold45revolver said:Hamlet Act III, scene i
It's more like a hobo wandering into the place where you work and shouting about the devil.BigJonsson said:So this revolver guy is the person behind the patent in the OP?
Is this like when that MS exec guy came on Gaf to respond to comments made about him at E3 last year?
EmCeeGramr said:It's more like a hobo wandering into the place where you work and shouting about the devil.
Why not forgo this contest and work on a mod yourself? Ideas are ideas, why not prove the legitimacy of your ideas by making them work? A patent doesn't guarantee that an idea is great, it's what you do with an idea that shows that it is great. Make a mod, show that your ideas have merit.gold45revolver said:hot women + epic quotes + classical soul = autumn rangers
THE GOLD 45 REVOLVER MODDING CONTEST!
As there are so many gaming companies out there, and so much MBA hype, it will be hard to tell who "gets" the technology without first seeing a mod from the company/studio. It is hard to tell who has really read and understood the patents, as well as the Great Books and Classics they reference, and who is just playing around and saying they "get it" in pursuit of mere profit. I mean one can say they are doing a "Dante's Inferno" game, and all is well and good, but then suddenly some MBA/fanboy magic goes down in a committee meeting, and the incorruptible Beatrice--the center and circumference of exaltation in Dante's poem--finds herself in hell. Oops! And after the fanboyization of the world, there are no rugged men in the corporation to stand up for her and defend her immortal soul. Now taht would be a game in its own right! And Dante the poet-warrior becomes a buff warrior swinging death's scythe. And that is why we want to first see mods incorporating the novel Gold 45 Revolver technology, before we license it to the victors of the modding contest.
Botolf said:Why not forgo this contest and work on a mod yourself? Ideas are ideas, why not prove the legitimacy of your ideas by making them work? A patent doesn't guarantee that an idea is great, it's what you do with an idea that shows that it is great. Make a mod, show that your ideas have merit.
All you've got is a piece of paper and you're arguing the merit of your ideas because you think your ideas are great. Is that the spirit of invention? That a man with ideas should line his pockets and let others do all the important work in his stead?
Guilty Conscience said:WTF is an exalted game?
thomaser said:Yes, it's Danish. Translated: "Uwe strikes back, and he has eaten Jack Thompson, and together they're reincarnated in the form of Dr. Elliot McGucken!" I'll leave it up to you if that's bad or good.
Have you met Denis Dyack from Silicon Knights, by the way? You're kinda like him, only you're what he is so much more... like a Dyack squared. I think your ideas are exceedingly silly, and the way you present them even sillier, but I'd still pay top dollar to play a Gucken/Dyack-game.
gold45revolver said:the only question is, which game will be the first to adapt the novel technology and capitalize on the epic buzz?
gold45revolver said:Just because you do not like reading "large walls of text" and have neither read nor comprehended the patents (nor Aristotle's Poetics, nor Homer's Iliad nor Odyssey, nor Dante's Inferno, nor Socrates' Apology, nor Campbell's Hero With a Thousand Faces) does not mean that they contain great, revolutionary ideas which exalt a sea change and seismic shift in the gaming industry, leading to billions of $$$$$ in new-found revenue for the agile, nimble companies and early-adopters seeking to serve the world with epic, exalted art; and not just yesteryear's hooker-killing tech. In fact, because typical fanboy gamers despise reading the Epic Classics, that became my great advantage, as it is in the classical words and story that the classical, epic moral premise and soul are exalted--not in the hot coffee. Thus, just like in A Fistful of Dollars, I used the MBA/fanboy arrogance against them in this showdown (while they were busy organizing fake protests), by penning eloquent, exalted patents, filled with "walls of text" containg the supreme eloquence Homer/Socrates/Jefferson and Mises, which I knew the corporate MBA brass would a) never read/ignore and b) send its best fanboys forth to try and destroy, before trying to shamelessly take credit for the innovative game design techniques in articles such the one above; and shortly, in novel, billion-dollar games. The corporate MBA machine's major goal is to a) do none of the heroic innovation and b) reap all the creative hero's innovations; countering the spirit of our very Constitution. And that is why I made the Gold 45 Revolver, so the lone rider would have a chance against the corporate-state Matrix and their walls of lockstepping, hooker-killing, spore-growing, money-losing fanboys--so that the lone rider could play a game in which they defended the US Constitution and classic, epic ideals such as love, romance, and honor;and so that the major gaming companies could serve their stock holders with greater profits, rather than losing billions in market cap, shedding jobs and market cap faster than Jeff Gordon and Dale Earndhart Jr. competing for pole position. And now, *everyone* wants a Gold 45. *Everyone* wants to shoot Zeus's lightning in the third act. And there are vast opportunities for major corporations to a) exalt classic, epic art, and b) reap billions in profits. Of course the postmodern MBA prefers to kill classic innovation, morality, and companies, cashing out during epic debauchery of the culture and ucrrency; as we just witnessed the death of Merrill, Lehman, the family, marriage, AIG, and Bear Sterns, and I know it is company/MBA-fnaboy policy that my work is to be ignored, belittled, and mocked; and then pilfered and adopted and profited off of. But, it ain't gonna go down like that, as there's a new sheriff in town.
gold45revolver said:Just because you do not like reading "large walls of text" and have neither read nor comprehended the patents (nor Aristotle's Poetics, nor Homer's Iliad nor Odyssey, nor Dante's Inferno, nor Socrates' Apology, nor Campbell's Hero With a Thousand Faces) does not mean that they do not contain great, revolutionary ideas which will exalt a sea change and seismic shift in the gaming industry, leading to billions of $$$$$ in new-found revenue for the agile, nimble companies and early-adopters seeking to serve the world with epic, exalted art; and not just yesteryear's hooker-killing tech. In fact, because typical fanboy gamers despise reading the Epic Classics, that became my great advantage, as it is in the classical words and story that the classical, epic moral premise and soul are exalted--not in the hot coffee. Thus, just like in A Fistful of Dollars, I used the MBA/fanboy arrogance against them in this showdown (while they were busy organizing fake protests), by penning eloquent, exalted patents, filled with "walls of text" containg the supreme eloquence Homer/Socrates/Jefferson and Mises, which I knew the corporate MBA brass would a) never read/ignore and b) send its best fanboys forth to try and destroy, before trying to shamelessly take credit for the innovative game design techniques in articles such the one above; and shortly, in novel, billion-dollar games. The corporate MBA machine's major goal is to a) do none of the heroic innovation and b) reap all the creative hero's innovations; countering the spirit of our very Constitution. And that is why I made the Gold 45 Revolver, so the lone rider would have a chance against the corporate-state Matrix and their walls of lockstepping, hooker-killing, spore-growing, money-losing fanboys--so that the lone rider could play a game in which they defended the US Constitution and classic, epic ideals such as love, romance, and honor;and so that the major gaming companies could serve their stock holders with greater profits, rather than losing billions in market cap, shedding jobs and market cap faster than Jeff Gordon and Dale Earndhart Jr. competing for pole position. And now, *everyone* wants a Gold 45. *Everyone* wants to shoot Zeus's lightning in the third act. And there are vast opportunities for major corporations to a) exalt classic, epic art, and b) reap billions in profits. Of course the postmodern MBA prefers to kill classic innovation, morality, and companies, cashing out during epic debauchery of the culture and ucrrency; as we just witnessed the death of Merrill, Lehman, the family, marriage, AIG, and Bear Sterns, and I know it is company/MBA-fnaboy policy that my work is to be ignored, belittled, and mocked; and then pilfered and adopted and profited off of. But, it ain't gonna go down like that, as there's a new sheriff in town.
Gomu Gomu said:
Damn, now I feel like such a casual gamer for not knowing that.doomed1 said:
pen and paper RPG system that's basically about over the top fantasy elements. pretty popular. not quite up there with D&D in popularity, but it's big enough...
Costanza said:do you have aspergers, gold45revolver?
did you make gerrys questgold45revolver said:finally someone made me laugh...
that rocks.
that's great packaging for bibleshock & Gerry's quest!
doomed1 said:this is something i feel is beyond my capability of reason and understanding...
Chinner said:did you make gerrys quest
LiquidMetal14 said:This has run its course.
gold45revolver said:
If you do not see the vast value of hard work and merit, then so be it. Even if your ideas are truly eloquent and "exalted", they will come to naught if you fail to execute on them.gold45revolver said:If some videogame company does not see the vast value of these eloquent, exalted ideas, without mashing buttons, then so be it.
I have no personal issue with reading, whether the work be short or long. The issue I take with your presentation is that it is fundamentally obtuse, made to be hard to follow and obscure. Do you comprehend that? The written word is for shared understanding and meaning, not as a tool to beat the heads in of the people you talk to. It is not a weapon, it is neither a thing to be misused.Just because you do not like reading "large walls of text" and have neither read nor comprehended the patents
Botolf said:If you do not see the vast value of hard work and merit, then so be it. Even if your ideas are truly eloquent and "exalted", they will come to naught if you fail to execute on them.
You think you're some kind of visionary, but you try to bring about your vision by playing it safe. A revolution is coming to the game industry, and I believe higher appreciations of morality and other human truths will be a part of it. Filing this patent of yours won't earn you a place in that revolution if you refuse to get your hands dirty.
I have no personal issue with reading, whether the work be short or long. The issue I take with your presentation is that it is fundamentally obtuse, made to be hard to follow and obscure. Do you comprehend that? The written word is for shared understanding and meaning, not as a tool to beat the heads in of the people you talk to. It is not a weapon, it is neither a thing to be misused.
Your abuse of the written word implies that you truly do not desire to make your ideas accessible. You cloud them in fog and misdirection, and rarely speak plainly of your meaning or intention. Your vision in this form is a mess, and it is entirely your fault. If you can't communicate what you mean, communicate better or quit talking.
Do you think that the coherency of the message cannot be destroyed by the message's author? You are a fool.
Do you think that writing ten thousand words in the defence of something is a replacement for hard work? You are a fool.
Do you think quoting the works and words of intellectuals is sufficient to lend you legitimacy? You are a fool.
Good luck in your endeavours. I can only hope you learn that your sermonizing will not result in the creation of your vision. We are neither your hands nor your muscle. Talk no more, fool of fools, for you waste yourself pursuing it in the stead of works.
EmCeeGramr said:this rabbit hole is endless
Botolf said:If you do not see the vast value of hard work and merit, then so be it. Even if your ideas are truly eloquent and "exalted", they will come to naught if you fail to execute on them.
You think you're some kind of visionary, but you try to bring about your vision by playing it safe. A revolution is coming to the game industry, and I believe higher appreciations of morality and other human truths will be a part of it. Filing this patent of yours won't earn you a place in that revolution if you refuse to get your hands dirty.
I have no personal issue with reading, whether the work be short or long. The issue I take with your presentation is that it is fundamentally obtuse, made to be hard to follow and obscure. Do you comprehend that? The written word is for shared understanding and meaning, not as a tool to beat the heads in of the people you talk to. It is not a weapon, it is neither a thing to be misused.
Your abuse of the written word implies that you truly do not desire to make your ideas accessible. You cloud them in fog and misdirection, and rarely speak plainly of your meaning or intention. Your vision in this form is a mess, and it is entirely your fault. If you can't communicate what you mean, communicate better or quit talking.
Do you think that the coherency of the message cannot be destroyed by the message's author? You are a fool.
Do you think that writing ten thousand words in the defence of something is a replacement for hard work? You are a fool.
Do you think quoting the works and words of intellectuals is sufficient to lend you legitimacy? You are a fool.
Good luck in your endeavours. I can only hope you learn that your sermonizing will not result in the creation of your vision. We are neither your hands nor your muscle. Talk no more, fool of fools, for you waste yourself pursuing it in the stead of works.
October, was it? I'll watch to see just what kind of works you create.gold45revolver said:dude--we're just waiting a few more months until yesteryear's hooker-killing technologies have run their course.
each and every word of this thread is immortal, and will bring thousands of fanboys over to the rising renaissance the fiatocracy must oppose as they shred the Constitution and dumb down/feminize our academies.
Gomu Gomu said:Excellent post. However, I do believe that this guy is either joking, or hopelessly fool.
edit: eh, his last post pretty much confirm it.
KevinRo said:This has to be a bot.
Some sort of evil viral marketing scheme that has entrenched GAF in its web.
At Neogaf, yes, but there isn't a list of developers that post that I know of.gold45revolver said:does anyone here work in the gaming industry?
Botolf said:At Neogaf, yes, but there isn't a list of developers that post that I know of.
gold45revolver said:i originally thought this was a roller hockey team fansite, but some of you guys seem to know your games, so it got me wondering.
bigdaddygamebot said:This is better than t.v.
ALOT better.
<--- eats more popcorn
Bob Loblaw said:On what page will the ban hammer fall? Taking bets now. I'm in for 200 internet bucks on page 5.
no... not feminization... NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOgold45revolver said:feminize our academies.
I might have been interested, but there's no reason to tie oneself down to a specific camp of thought. Making the mod and releasing it is enough to make people contemplate ways games might be changed (example mods: Dear Esther, Radiator). The "right way" forward doesn't belong to one man.gold45revolver said:so let us progress to stage 2.
who here is going to design the first epic gold 45 mod and share in the front-lines honor of the great books gaming reniassance?
Kilrogg said:gold45revolver, will there be a Wii version of your game?
gold45revolver said:hell yeah!
imagine shooting zeus's lightning via the wii controller as the feminized MBA fanboys/vampires/communists descend upn you in the pouring rain, and your 45 begins to glow gold!
ProfessorLobo said:Gold45, you do realize that no matter the media, whether it be videogames, comic books, or movies, one of the keys to crafting a good story is that the viewer doesn't enjoy being preached at?
Having ideologys crammed down one's throat is not enjoyable for anyone. QUOTE]
exactly! that is why the bible is the worst-selling book of stories of all time!
Kilrogg said:HELL YEAH. Will it be bundled with some kind of awesome peripheral too?