Queso de Grande
Member
This is such a stupid, but ballsy move I can't even get upset. How could anyone not know this would be a bad idea. Lol
Out of curiosity, what did you see?
My virgin eyeballs aren't ready to check it out.
Well, let's see...
there was the photo of a man with down syndrome pooping. With the poop hanging between his legs.
Followed by drawings of robots with human vaginas.
Followed by sexually explicit cartoon characters (Poor Rescue Rangers...)
And naked cartoon kids.
All on the same forum thread... Beware /b/
I've never been to a chan sight before. My innocence just did with a sudden knife to the groin.
I'm no prude. I laugh at politically incorrect shit all the time. And I love me some boobies. But WTF did I just walk in to. Some things are better left undiscovered.
![]()
Curiosity... and robots... killed the cat.
Umm you guys are overreacting. 4chan and 8chan are not that big a deal, and as is always the case, unless you look for crazy shit you aren't going to see it. This isn't TOR for fucks sakeYeah. It's strange seeing people defend it to be honest.
Already calls for multiple firings I see. Standard.
Honestly though, is there some sort of list of "bad places" on the internet?
I mean, I was aware that there was a place called 8chan, but I had never visited or even knew its actual web address until looking it up just now. If you aren't already mired in this shit, how are you supposed to know its this wretched hive of scum and villainy?
Umm you guys are overreacting. 4chan and 8chan are not that big a deal, and as is always the case, unless you look for crazy shit you aren't going to see it. This isn't TOR for fucks sake
Has social media sanitized the internet that people have forgotten what it is actually like?
You guys post about the other site so much it's embarrassing.
It's crazy shit on top of crazy shit on top of other crazy shit. Seeing something weird was well...commonWhat is the internet "actually like"?
8chan, also called Infinitechan or Infinitychan (sometimes stylized as ∞chan), is an American imageboard website composed of user-created boards. Each board is moderated by its owner, with minimal interaction from other site administration.[3] To own a board one must either create it or claim it if the board has had inactivity for over a week.
4chan is an English-language imageboard website. Users generally post anonymously, with the most recent posts appearing above the rest. 4chan is split into various boards with their own specific content and guidelines. Registration is not possible (except for staff).
Reddit is an American social news aggregation, web content rating, and discussion website. Registered members submit content to the site such as links, text posts, and images, which are then voted up or down by other members. Posts are organized by subject into user-created boards called "subreddits", which cover a variety of topics including news, science, movies, video games, music, books, fitness, food, and image-sharing. Submissions with more up-votes appear towards the top of their subreddit and, if they receive enough votes, ultimately on the site's front page. Despite strict rules prohibiting harassment, Reddit's administrators spend considerable resources on moderating the site.
imagine the outcasts of 4chan. it's a shithole beyond beliefWtf is an 8chan?
Are you guys 12 or something?
There are SFW boards/subreddits/forums and all three sites are full of questionable content. Straight up CP and other similiar stuff gets removed on all of them.
I'm curious how far does this train of thought of goes.I don't get why people think this is ballsy. Promoting a cesspool of racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia and even pedophilia and using it as a marketing tool is not ballsy. Its just stupid.
Its like if Nike collaborated with their local KKK chapter for their next marketing gig.
Sure, it gets people talking, but only from a naive "all publicity is good publicity" would this be a good thing.
People will get fired over this. And rightfully so, because if you are a PR guy and think its smart to associate your brand with child pornography you have no business in working in PR.
I'm curious how far does this train of thought of goes.
For example, you brought up Nike, whose own company ethics comes into question (i.e the use of child exploitation via sweatshops).
Or what if someone travels to China and do a collaboration with the locals? Wouldn't that be seen as promoting a country with poor human rights records?
I don't see how globalized supply chains are in any way comparable to a marketing collaboration with a fringe forum for extremist, hateful and illegal content.
People will get fired over this. And rightfully so, because if you are a PR guy and think its smart to associate your brand with child pornography you have no business in working in PR.
Because the global supply chain is directly funding or in support of exploitation in foreign countries?I don't see how globalized supply chains are in any way comparable to a marketing collaboration with a fringe forum for extremist, hateful and illegal content.
I don't get why people think this is ballsy. Promoting a cesspool of racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia and even pedophilia and using it as a marketing tool is not ballsy. Its just stupid.
Its like if Nike collaborated with their local KKK chapter for their next marketing gig.
Sure, it gets people talking, but only from a naive "all publicity is good publicity" would this be a good thing.
People will get fired over this. And rightfully so, because if you are a PR guy and think its smart to associate your brand with child pornography you have no business in working in PR.
I would actually argue that behind all that shitposting, 4chan has far better discussions than Reddit. If anything, I would put 8chan as "actual internet hell". Not sure why 4chan gets all the hate.8chan is like the halfway hell between actual internet hell (4chan) and Lite Hell (Reddit)
Oh dang, you might be right, actually. I'm seeing some people talking about Twitter banning Japanese art/anime/manga with underage characters. I can't find a news story or any real evidence, though. I see one tweet claiming Dragon Ball and Sailor Moon art is banned now because Twitter is adopting the UN's new proposal to ban underage art for their rules. Huh.Didn't twitter just ban that kinda of stuff too?
If that's the case then that's understandable. Whilst 4chan and moot are quite known names or terms in the news, 8chan is far more obscure.By the sound of it they got invited to do it, however did not realise what they where signing up for.
What is there to yikes about when so far the intent seems to be that they didn't do this on purpose?Big yikes mate. Fire the guy. His job is to PR not to shit pr
I for one would love to see John Linneman compare how this 720p porn clip looks compared to the 4K premium and how the framerate is.Gaming AMAs on 8chan, next we will have gaming tech videos on Pornhub. Maybe Digital Foundry should move their videos to Xhamster or Xtube too...
Looks like Ree tried to doxx the THQ Nordic guy, to the surprise of literally no one.
The gaming press reaction to this is straight up pathetic.
Stop talking on sites we don't like.
A brand associating itself with a toxic group. I just chose a random hate group. I could have used Neonazis, Salafists or WBC instead.I don't see how Nike (a fashion brand) using the KKK is comparable either. Your analogy is poor. And based on culpability and foreknowledge.
This is an oversight on part of the PR guy that would be comparable to not knowing what kind of group the KKK is.But to actually frame your analogy correctly, it's more like a PR manager at Nike being invited free advertising space in a publication. The PR manager does not check what the publication is or about, then due to public backlash realises what contentious content the publication is linked to. The PR manager then apologises. It's not as 'grabby' but it's more accurate.
This isn't just like any old mistake. The circumstances that lead to this mistake are the actual problem here.Well, they didn't think it was smart did they. They made a fuck up and admitted it. You can take that at face value or conjure up conspiracy theories that align to your assumptions.
You can't excuse aligning yourself with a toxic community like 8chan by pointing towards exploitative labor situations in China.Because the global supply chain is directly funding or in support of exploitation in foreign countries?
Or like I said, what if any company did a promotion/marketing in China? Are those not all PR wins for the Chinese government who is notoriously extreme or hateful?
Most people agree that it is stupid.
What is also stupid is the pearlclutching and the insinuation that THQ Nordic are "evil" or "support pedophilia/nazism/whatevism" because they did this stupid thing.
A brand associating itself with a toxic group. I just chose a random hate group. I could have used Neonazis, Salafists or WBC instead.
This is an oversight on part of the PR guy that would be comparable to not knowing what kind of group the KKK is.
But I am not giving the benefit of the doubt to the PR guy here. He and others from THQN management have clearly shown that they are familiar with 8chan in their posts.
This isn't just like any old mistake. The circumstances that lead to this mistake are the actual problem here.
You can't excuse aligning yourself with a toxic community like 8chan by pointing towards exploitative labor situations in China.
Even by the low standard of whataboutist arguments this is especially dumb.
Well, it certainly warrants a closer look at how this could happen and what kind of culture is being cultivated at THQN.
The video game industry is already struggling with toxic parts of the gaming community. We don't need that escalated further by developers and publishers.
I personally just think its extremely unlikely that PR and management signed off on this movement and no one actually knew what 8chan was and no one thought it was necessary to look into it before holding an AMA there. Thats just not how these things work.
So assuming they actually knew what 8chan was, I think its necessary for the gaming press and audience to draw a clear line here that signal boosting hate groups and criminals is not acceptable and the people who think thats a good idea or even just funny should be held accountable.
The best part is "This prompted a titanic wave of backlash from THQ fans.". Yeah...right..because the ones complaining are THQ fansSuch bitter. Especially that Kotaku piece. Truly the Daily Mail of gaming.
A brand associating itself with a toxic group. I just chose a random hate group. I could have used Neonazis, Salafists or WBC instead.
This is an oversight on part of the PR guy that would be comparable to not knowing what kind of group the KKK is. But I am not giving the benefit of the doubt to the PR guy here. He and others from THQN management have clearly shown that they are familiar with 8chan in their posts.
This isn't just like any old mistake. The circumstances that lead to this mistake are the actual problem here.
Stop crying, the entire RE forum is a toxic group as well, and nobody cries when developers post there. Oh wait that's right, because most of the fucking whining comes from Ree and their game publication friends.
Why?Either, or. It's still inapt.
The popularity or name recognition really isn't the deciding factor here. If a company does marketing it carefully choses the channels it uses because that what marketing is all about.No it isn't. There are people in this thread that did not know what 8ch was. 8ch is a platform, not a website. I'd find it hard to find a member of the public that did not know what the KKK was.
I don't know what the "rattle" is.It's more like me asking you - do you what the 'rattle' is?
Provide compelling evidence of the second part of your post please (bolded). The key part of this sentence is oranged - because you're basically admitting your reaction is based on a leap. Which is fine, but it is a leap and a massive one at that.
A marketing department is responsible for the marketing campaigns it does. And it is not unreasonable to assume that a marketing department knows what kind of audiences it likes to reach with its marketing campaigns.The same kind of leap that distances Darwinism from creationism. All this retrospective reaction is based on 'furious googlers' who stitch the many articles strewn across the web into something that supports their stance, while having no real knowledge of the events or circumstances around them.
1. This was signed off by multiple people and multiple took part in the AMA from THQN's side.No. The 'fire them all' response and conspiracy theory crafting are the actual problem here. Let's review the facts.
THQNordic were approached to do an AMA on 8chan;
PR guy agreed after speaking to the inviter and without checking what 8ch was;
Social media blew up in response;
PR guy was told why this was a bad idea afterwards;
PR guy personally apologised and held his hands up saying he didn't do due diligence on the request source;
Slobbering masses shout for his head/job to feel powerful;
So let's go to the conspiracy theories about it being 'edgy'
THQNordic are currently riding a decent wave and are largely an acquisition publisher;
They have almost shed their bad reputation from a while back;
Any risk of being edgy would have direct financial costs to soon-to-release titles and future acquisitions;
The benefit of posting on 8chan will full knowledge of what sub communities exist would not be worth that risk;
So what you're suggesting is that they deliberately went out their way to destroy themselves.