ElectricBlanketFire
Member
No Super Metroid? No sale.
It's a list for games, not hat simulators.
No Mario Galaxy? Huge fail.
It seems only one of each franchise was allowed. Could've been worse.
Glad to see Wing Commander get some love, it's often forgotten in these lists.
Wii Sports may have been iconic and important, but AS A GAME it is shallow and leaves a lot to be desired.
They seem to go by the mentality that you see sometimes where there can only be one or two games listed from a series. It never makes sense because certain series have quite a few games that should be on a top 100 list. Nearly every main Mario game could be on a top 100 list.
And the lack of racing games on this list is absolutely insane.
I hate lists that include a bunch of games because of their historical significance. It's like a best films list including a bunch of Edison shorts. Who wants to play Pong and Space Invaders ahead of Virtua Tennis and Space Invaders Extreme?
Gears of War series is pretty great and unique in how it plays MP wise. RE1 is already on the list.Gears of War but no Resident Evil 4?
No Ocarina of Time or Mario Galaxy? wtf is this shit?
Gears of War series is pretty great and unique in how it plays MP wise. It seems the list doesn't want to mention to many games from the same franchise. RE1 is already on the list.
It's not really stupid, it allows for a more diverse and interesting list imo.which is why it is stupid. the two games may exist in the same 'franchise' but are both incredibly different and were both highly influential in different ways.
No Ocarina of Time?
I do. :/
It's not really stupid, it allows for a more diverse and interesting list imo.
Mass Effect 3 is better than them anyway.
It's not really stupid, it allows for a more diverse and interesting list imo.
I like it that way, apparently the creators who made that list as well.Who cares about the list being diverse? The list should say what they actually think are the top 100 games of all time - regardless of number from each franchise. Not put dumb limiters.
Instead we have shit like Metroid on the list over Super Metroid or Prime, no Ocarina, no Galaxy, etc.
Dunno what's so offensive about that.Instead we have shit like Metroid on the list over Super Metroid or Prime, no Ocarina, no Galaxy, etc.
So first you use gamerankings as argument and then you detract it yourself. Interesting logic you have there.It allows for a list missing the 7 highest reviewed games of all time according to game rankings. I mean, no top 100 list should just be based on review scores, but you've probably fucked up if the 7 best reviewed games of all time aren't in your list.
Oot wouldn't make the list either way then. It's not very different from the other games. You may have point with RE, but I'd rather have a more diverse list with more different franchises.It might not be 'interesting' to you that RE4 and Ocarina of Time are more influential than Gears of War, say... but to disqualify them both because two very different games were in the same franchise is bonkers.
does anyone on gaf seriously think angry birds is a good game? I'm genuinely curious.
does anyone on gaf seriously think angry birds is a good game? I'm genuinely curious.
It'd be fun to see how many of them you've played.
Let me count.
Edit: 68. Not bad.