Legendary Warrior said:
I'm amazed at the number of people who are completely okay with, or even encourage, using the government as a means of artistic quality control. Even ignoring how misguided that crusade is here, I think that's mind-blowing. It's so directly contradictory to any reasonable notion of free expression that I can think of.
Oh FFS, I love how people jump on moral high horse and accept any sort of shit just for "freedom of expression". While the law is too vague, it is there to prevent a very specific situation: publishers putting pornographic material in magazines, mangas, animation which don't carry "18+" rating. This will never fly with JAV, but since it's drawing it's ok now? Please....
I know publishers depended on young otaku getting their porn fix, because legally they couldn't buy real porn or more "hard" type of hentai - well tough shit. This is also why the law doesn't target photography - if there is sex in there, BAM, it's 18+ no questions asked, everyone understands that.
Let's take a look at this law:
- Now the criteria will be expanded to include: Any manga, animation, or pictures (but not including real life pictures or footage) that features either sexual or pseudo sexual acts that would be illegal in real life, or sexual or pseudo sexual acts between close relatives whose marriage would be illegal*, where such depictions and / or presentations unjustifiably glorify or exaggerate the activity.
Why are publishers complaining? They can still sell OVAs with girls making slurpy sounds, or girls masturbating through panties with no problem to MINORS. Sankaku is a shit site however check last two weeks to get the idea what passes for "normal" anime nowadays.
Paracelsus said:
I think it's still a bad thing but you've got to admit some anime recently aired really got carried away with this stuff, regardless of the airing time.
LINK EDIT: Mods don't like Sankaku. If anyone wants to see what kind of stuff is in anime nowadays go to Sankaku and simply browse last 3-4 pages. You will find plenty.
Yes, this kind of shit is sold to minors, and will CONTINUE to be sold to minors. The only thing publishers need to change is to throw away loli sex (and I'm even not sure about that - what's the legal age to have sex in Japan? I heard it's pretty low, so any character older than that can get it on no problem), and incest. How fucked up do you have to be to protest this?