Discotheque
Banned
To make it even more realistic than that they can give Lara Croft breast cancer
What the hell :^/Discotheque said:To make it even more realistic than that they can give Lara Croft breast cancer
abstract alien said:What the hell :^/
His Street Fighter ones are the best, constantly referencing the live action film.Discotheque said:You should see the guy's Goldeneye review, it's even better.
Catalix said:And out of nowhere, Tomb Raider manages to steal my attention... what the hell? It's been at least a decade since a TR announcement has genuinely sparked my interest. The Lara design looks great and sets a better tone going forward. Definite upgrade from her older iterations.
This new "survival" angle is totally working for me as well. Exploring a vast, hazardous open-world island as a vulnerable protagonist; rummaging for food, water, and other supplies along the way? Personally, that's a console experience I've been wishing on for a while.
Well, they said all the right things to get me hooked this early. Now, if only they can pull off these lofty concepts with a decent amount of polish, I'd be elated. Hoping for the best, CD.
:/"Lara's careless use of the explosives cause a cave in. Sprinting toward the light that signifies salvation, Lara tumbles down a fissure in the collapsing pathway and must scramble up the steep path to escape. THE PLAYER IS IN CONTROL THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE ORDEAL frantically alternating between shoulder buttons to move up the incline, dodging falling boulders with button prompts and trying to find a safe path through the chaos with analog controls"
BowieZ said:
Uncharted 2 looked just about that good so I'm hopeful those 2 pics are really in game.BowieZ said:The two in-game shots from some leaked scans of GI look incredible; indeed, too good to be true.
BowieZ said:
What the fuck?soldat7 said:Could be the girlfriend of Marcus Fenix.
Yoshiya said:Hmmm, some comments in GI make it seem like this is a reboot of the entire franchise, not just the mainline games (old Lara to never appear again). It would be strange though to have the next downloadable game to completely break continuity with the first one, by having it feature the new Lara. That game was only successfully released a few months ago, now it doesn't seem to exist :/
Odd.
I just hope they kill off the "Lara Croft" thing and make it GoL into its own series, with some other faceman/woman lead. No reason to have two completely different versions of the same brand. As exciting as the new Tomb Raider news is, I want more games like LC:GOL (without Lara, so my mind can be at ease).Salaadin said:Thats probably the reason for the name differences. This is a reboot of the Tomb Raider franchise. GoL is probably the start of the Lara Croft franchise.
I know it doesnt make any sense.
It is a reboot of the franchise.Yoshiya said:Hmmm, some comments in GI make it seem like this is a reboot of the entire franchise, not just the mainline games (old Lara to never appear again). It would be strange though to have the next downloadable game to completely break continuity with the first one, by having it feature the new Lara. That game was only successfully released a few months ago, now it doesn't seem to exist :/
Odd.
Salaadin said:I know it doesnt make any sense.
I don't consider that a problem at all. Potentially fucking yourself over is what makes survival gameplay meaningful. People accustomed to more forgiving difficulty trends in modern gaming would just need to toughen up a bit.ArjanN said:The problem with surivial type games is that they need to give you the option to screw yourself by running out of supplies and modern games, especially console games, have been moving away from that kind of design.
And people who are only now rediscovering Tomb Raider need to go back and play the last 4 Cystal Dynamics TR games because they were all good games.
I think that the idea is for the new Lara to exist in her own continuity and brand name, with old Lara relegated to settings where having a posh british accent and a sense of invincibility makes more sense.Salaadin said:Thats probably the reason for the name differences. This is a reboot of the Tomb Raider franchise. GoL is probably the start of the Lara Croft franchise.
I know it doesnt make any sense.
Sickboy007 said:The graphics in the scans look seriously amazing.
UrbanRats said:One thing i loved about the old TRs and Anniversary was that you didn't have the costant chatting in your ear.
Hated this part of Legend/Underworld, cause it totally drain from the sense of being alone in an ancient tomb, where nobody has been in, for centuries.
I don't wanna hear lame jokes or useless advices, goddamit.
graphics? scans? did I miss a link?Sickboy007 said:The graphics in the scans look seriously amazing.
Yeah, what are you guys talking about?!Max said:graphics? scans? did I miss a link?
DaBuddaDa said:I've seen the scans. I don't think any of it is in-game, they look like rendered glamorshots. This is judging from blurry scans.
Dead said:Lara's full new costume actually reminds me of Sheva from RE5
SolidSnakex said:It's amazing to see how far graphics have come in open world games. I remember last gen you basically accepted that an open world game wasn't going to look good. And now current gen open world titles are even able to stand up to linear titles.
Catalix said:I don't consider that a problem at all. Potentially fucking yourself over is what makes survival gameplay meaningful. People accustomed to more forgiving difficulty trends in modern gaming would just need to toughen up a bit.
Besides, there's a good chance the survival mechanics won't be as rigorous or punishing as some of you are fearing. It all depends on how CD decide to implement the features. Minor levels of resource management can be fun, as long as it's done intuitively.
It can only help the immersion factor. It doesn't have to be super difficult or intrusive, but at least it should have some level of impact on the adventure you'll be experiencing.
seady said:It looks very very Uncharted 2.
Their proprietary engine that they built is just as good.Sickboy007 said:I actually thought for a moment they were using the Avalanche engine which is goddamn incredible, but they're not under the Eidos/SE umbrella.