You should follow a story to completion before posting if you are planning on arguing points about said story
Last response to you because you don't seem to be listening and are needlessly condescending and aggressive for reasons unknown.
I have followed the story from beginning to end. Just because someone issues a joint statement does not mean it's what happened. Just as a settlement in a civil case does not mean the damages are actually what was caused.
These are compromises not a recitation of what happened. Obviously, she has outright lied about what he called her and this definitely damages her credibility. I'm not saying her statement on 10/3 was true (very well could have been another of her exaggerations), I'm just saying if she was right about him knowing his mistake, and he still refused to call her what she wanted to be called, then that changes things a bit. He probably didn't even know what she wanted to be called, and in that case it's on both of them to have clarified it somehow.
The statement doesn't explain why he changed from referring to her as one of the guys on stage all of a sudden to "this person", which he admits to calling her in the statement. If you aren't aware of any mistake, wouldn't you just keep calling the person a "he" as he had originally thought?
For example, I've been in a situation where I met a person briefly who I thought was a man, but was actually a woman. I kept referring to this person as a man, and I never changed and began referring to her as anything but a man. It wasn't until days after that someone let me know that I had actually been talking to a woman. I'm sure she was offended, but at the same time it shows that I was 100% honestly mistaken and never realized it.