cboat is GAFs legendary leaker. He/she/it is trusted because the leaks are always true.Who is cboat and why do we trust him on this anyway? serious question.
Do you really believe there's even the slightest possibility that he'd confirm such a thing?Wow this is pathetic... you just want it to be true even if they come out and say it's false?
He had that answer ready very quickly.
He is a poster on this board, and we trust him because he is always right, even on things that seemed ridiculous at the time, and which no one should have any right to know. (e.g. the 360 DVD size limit of 6.8GB way before release, when people weren't even sure if it used DVD or HD-DVD)Who is cboat and why do we trust him on this anyway? serious question.
See as he is a Microsoft employee that would actually know something like this... I'm going to take his side yes.
They aren't good enough alternatives. Forza and Infamous are the only ones on that list that actually compete with/surpass their equivalents. Microsoft wins in every other case. Killzone in particular--that stuff's awful, as was Resistance (except 3, which was cool).
CBOAT did not say anything specific about ESRAM- he/she/it referred to "technical tarbaby", which many people interpreted as related to ESRAM, or yields, or something.
esram yieldls. are "troubling"toput it lightly.
CBOAT did not say anything specific about ESRAM- he/she/it referred to "technical tarbaby", which many people interpreted as related to ESRAM, or yields, or something.
He is a poster on this board, and we trust him because he is always right, even on things that seemed ridiculous at the time, and which no one should have any right to know. (e.g. the 360 DVD size limit of 6.8GB way before release, when people weren't even sure if it used DVD or HD-DVD)
Xenon facts from the big hi roller game meets last week
-- ALL TITLES must be live aware
-- movie playback? WM9-based
-- built in mp3/wma player
-- 7gigbyte dvd with dual layers
-- xbox 2 hd is gonna be optional {uh oh}
this post is sponnsored by my buttocks n
He is a poster on this board, and we trust him because he is always right, even on things that seemed ridiculous at the time, and which no one should have any right to know. (e.g. the 360 DVD size limit of 6.8GB way before release, when people weren't even sure if it used DVD or HD-DVD)
cboat is GAFs legendary leaker. He/she/it is trusted because the leaks are always true.
Very credible insider, he actually gave us the respawn next gen exclusive that leaked today.
Why respond to it at all then? It all seems odd to meDo people really think they're going to admit to this on twitter?
Did you honestly expect an answer of "Yes we're a few months from launch and are having major issues with chip yields"
Anyone who thought that, contact me later I have some real estate for sale, cheap but amazing locations around the world.
Would he really confirm it to be true? I don't think so.
Do people really think they're going to admit to this on twitter?
Did you honestly expect an answer of "Yes we're a few months from launch and are having major issues with chip yields"
Anyone who thought that, contact me later I have some real estate for sale, cheap but amazing locations around the world.
Truthfact: Who really gives a shit about any of this?
Clearly no one does, that's why this thread is approaching 5000 replies in a bit over a day.Truthfact: Who really gives a shit about any of this?
That's a logical fallacy for one and secondly they admitted to the problems of RROD and paid for them.
Good point. There's no way he could have formulated a 15-word response amounting to "that's not true" in just a few minutes. Something fishy is going on here . . .
Do people really think they're going to admit to this on twitter?
Did you honestly expect an answer of "Yes we're a few months from launch and are having major issues with chip yields"
Anyone who thought that, contact me later I have some real estate for sale, cheap but amazing locations around the world.
See as he is a Microsoft employee that would actually know something like this... I'm going to take his side yes.
Insiders denied it?I notice that an unsubstantiated Gaf rumor (with as many "insiders" denying it as confirming it), followed by a formal retort from a Microsoft representative who would see a backlash if he openly lied about something, still has people insisting that its true. Not because of any evidence, but because it simply must be true.
Interesting.
I notice that an unsubstantiated Gaf rumor (with as many "insiders" denying it as confirming it), followed by a formal retort from a Microsoft representative who would see a backlash if he openly lied about something, still has people insisting that its true. Not because of any evidence, but because it simply must be true.
Interesting.
I notice that an unsubstantiated Gaf rumor (with as many "insiders" denying it as confirming it), followed by a formal retort from a Microsoft representative who would see a backlash if he openly lied about something, still has people insisting that its true. Not because of any evidence, but because it simply must be true.
Interesting.
I notice that an unsubstantiated Gaf rumor (with as many "insiders" denying it as confirming it), followed by a formal retort from a Microsoft representative who would see a backlash if he openly lied about something, still has people insisting that its true. Not because of any evidence, but because it simply must be true.
Interesting.
no.
pr=$$$ to shil for corps
me=notpaifd fpor anyting 9 ysrs here on gaf, all free and all myo love. gamers and games, noohther.
esram stands, perio.d.
truthfact.
Such as?
no.
pr=$$$ to shil for corps
me=notpaifd fpor anyting 9 ysrs here on gaf, all free and all myo love. gamers and games, noohther.
esram stands, perio.d.
truthfact.
The surprise is in the fact that he responded at all. Again, a rumor from a message board that no one other than hardcore nerds like us would even remotely know about. But not only that he responded, that he felt the need to deny it.
No, nobody is expecting him to confirm poor eSRAM yields on Twitter. Just sayin, it's weird.
no.
pr=$$$ to shil for corps
me=notpaifd fpor anyting 9 ysrs here on gaf, all free and all myo love. gamers and games, noohther.
esram stands, perio.d.
truthfact.
That's a logical fallacy for one and secondly they admitted to the problems of RROD and paid for them.
no.
pr=$$$ to shil for corps
me=notpaifd fpor anyting 9 ysrs here on gaf, all free and all myo love. gamers and games, noohther.
esram stands, perio.d.
truthfact.
I notice that an unsubstantiated Gaf rumor (with as many "insiders" denying it as confirming it), followed by a formal retort from a Microsoft representative who would see a backlash if he openly lied about something, still has people insisting that its true. Not because of any evidence, but because it simply must be true.
Interesting.
And to reiterate: If they don't respond to a rumor, it's obviously true, even if we have inconsistent information on our end. And if they respond with a clear denial, it must still be true, because "this company would never make an accurate statement." There's something in the air right now, and I don't like the smell of it.
Pretty much.no.
pr=$$$ to shil for corps
me=notpaifd fpor anyting 9 ysrs here on gaf, all free and all myo love. gamers and games, noohther.
esram stands, perio.d.
truthfact.
Major Nelson doesn't know what the rumour is. Of course he's going to deny someone asking him if this thing he heard on GAF is true if he doesn't know what the thing is.