damien1928
Banned
lol@ thinking Pac wouldn't have been all up in some terrible damn movies. He was 25 breh that part of his career was just around the corner.
You know this how?
lol@ thinking Pac wouldn't have been all up in some terrible damn movies. He was 25 breh that part of his career was just around the corner.
Even good actors end up in trash. It's rare to have a Daniel Day Lewis type.You know this how?
Do some studies and write a well-sourced book if you're trying to school me on socioeconomic issues in the United States. Seriously. You're not telling me anything I'm not fully aware of, and you're totally off-base with your conclusions about my perspective here. Engage the position and not what you're imagining is on the other side of the keyboard.
Even good actors end up in trash. It's rare to have a Daniel Day Lewis type.
Do some studies and write a well-sourced book if you're trying to school me on socioeconomic issues in the United States. Seriously. You're not telling me anything I'm not fully aware of, and you're totally off-base with your conclusions about my perspective here. Engage the position and not what you're imagining is on the other side of the keyboard.
Write a book before debating this with you? Wow. Yup, that's not condescending.
We're talking 2pac here, I don't need any qualification to tell you how he impacted my life and how offended some of us are regarding your "all for image" comment.
write a book if you're gonna go tete a tete with white folks brehs
Tupac had two sides because the struggle is a living breathing part of the culture.
Comment wasn't racially motivated whatsoever. I don't assume anything about someone's skin color on the internet. Or gender. Or anything else. On the other hand, you looked at my avatar and went straight for a racist angle. Bye now.
We're at: baseless assumptions that I don't know anything about Tupac's life or the Tupac/Biggie beef, followed by a condescending and not-very-factual dumbshit faceplant of an attempt to outline said history to me, and then additional "you don't know anything about the struggle 101" talk (based on what? and how are you gleaning that from my original post?), and then assuming that I'm making a racist comment when I react harshly to the aforementioned unwarranted condescension. I didn't say anything about race. I didn't imply anything about race. I didn't come at anyone in this thread. I made a comment contrasting Tupac's words in that interview with his actions afterwards, since it's a pretty fucking stark contrast. With the book comment I implied that the poster was barking up the wrong tree by text bombing me with such incredibly basic context like I'm a random prick throwing an ignorant hot take from my ivory tower of privilege. Nah, just discussing a controversial, divisive figure who has an intense cult of personality.
Man, it's impossible to reconcile his talking points. So the media and politicians are unfairly characterizing him as a gangsta rapper, and his music and lyrics aren't glorifying gang life and violence and dying senselessly over bullshit (but the Thug Life ethos has nothing to do with that? what?), and he's not a negative influence and doesn't bear any responsibility for what's happening on the ground? Okay, but his public persona is like the all-time definitive case study on successfully glorifying all of it, and he comes out of that bid releasing the most incendiary diss track in history which pulled a ton of people into his personal beef, turned friends on each other, and got folks killed. He crossed a line that no one was willing to cross before and everyone knows better than to cross again. All for image.
Man, it's impossible to reconcile his talking points. So the media and politicians are unfairly characterizing him as a gangsta rapper, and his music and lyrics aren't glorifying gang life and violence and dying senselessly over bullshit (but the Thug Life ethos has nothing to do with that? what?), and he's not a negative influence and doesn't bear any responsibility for what's happening on the ground? Okay, but his public persona is like the all-time definitive case study on successfully glorifying all of it, and he comes out of that bid releasing the most incendiary diss track in history which pulled a ton of people into his personal beef, turned friends on each other, and got folks killed. He crossed a line that no one was willing to cross before and everyone knows better than to cross again. All for image.
Bye now.
We're at: baseless assumptions that I don't know anything about Tupac's life or the Tupac/Biggie beef
followed by a condescending and not-very-factual dumbshit faceplant of an attempt to outline said history to me,
This thread breaks my heart. Pac was a murderer, sure (Saving the life of a man being viciously beaten by a Police Officer, but so what. Labels), but a rapist? Come on.
Next, you'll tell me Kobe really raped that woman in Denver.
This thread breaks my heart.
It really does, I honestly think the film, "all eyes on me" did a lot more damage then good
man I hate that film.
I havent read the entire thread, but i guess you're being sarcastic or joking ?
I believe East Coast vs. West Coast when I first read it, but that was a media perpetuation. Rappers didn't suddenly hate rappers from another coast. It was the two biggest labels fueding, and RL friends of Pac/Biggie inserting themselves into it.What line did he cross that no one has since?
I havent read the entire thread, but i guess you're being sarcastic or joking ?
Really? The undercover officer didn't die? My bad for spreading false information. Don't want to add anymore of that here. Won't delete, but I will add a retraction.2pac didn't kill anyone.
A 6 year old child was killed by a gun registered to him, not he himself that pulled the trigger.
He shot two police officers, they didn't die.
Glad that I didn't end up checking that film out. Reviews were so bad that I couldn't go even for my boy.
Hope that a much better film, or short series, is made concerning his life.
Yeah you never want to see it, unless you want to be mad at the inaccuracy and the poor portrayal of Tupac, Jada Pinkett Smith commenting on the film, validating that her last interaction with him in the movie was all a lie really was the last straw, considering what that scene was supposed to be doing.
The ending was wow, atrociously bad, they could have done so much with the ending and they really messed up, I was sitting afterwards writing down multiple ways they could have ended it that would of been more authentic and more fitting. Film was a mistake.
I'm sorry, I'm not sure what this means exactly.
I'll never watch it. The 'biopic' could never match up to what I know really happened by listening to people that knew him best and the man himself.It really does, I honestly think the film, "all eyes on me" did a lot more damage then good
man I hate that film.
I knew it was a bad idea to make a movie in the first place, never a fan of that. Just watch the real tupac on youtube, plenty of interviews,etc. Also Afeni didn't support the movie, that should say it all.
I'm sorry, I'm not sure what this means exactly.
The severity of the diss? Who he dissed? How many people he dissed in one song?
Because there are events that have happened since that follow that exact mold. The East V. West thing was media hype. This was Death Row v. Bad Boy Entertainment. It just so happened they were on opposing coasts.
Really? The undercover officer didn't die? My bad for spreading false information. Don't want to add anymore of that here. Won't delete, but I will add a retraction.
But then, that means his word was taken over the word of 2 LA Police Officers. In the 90's. Thats fucking crazy in and of itself.
Me, someone born after Tupac diedwho didn't
Me, someone born after Tupac died
Yeah still not sure what the line that's never been crossed since is?
If it's east vs south
They didn't create that
If it's pac saying i fucked your wife
People have said and done worse since
If it's threatening to kill
Again, people have crossed that line
What's the point your trying to make?
The only thing I can think of about the line being crossed with HitEmUp is if the Puffy/Southside Crip hit theory is true. Under that theory, Puff was going to only have Suge killed and Pac was added to the hit after the song dropped. The hit was supposed to be in LA, but Deathrow does things forward when they jumped Orlando Anderson.
Ok, bolded I agree with. It is the pinnacle of vitriol and savageness thrown at a rival on an instrumental by the most iconic rapper in history. That I cannot deny.There's a thing called context. Which is why I provided it. People say worse things to each other every day. We could go harder at each other right now in this thread, without much effort; I have millions of words under my belt trolling idiots on the internet and people form communities around their mutual salt for me, so it's not like I revere Hit 'Em Up as the holy grail of personal attacks on a lyrical level. But if we had a verbal exchange here it just wouldn't, y'know, matter at all, no one would care, and it would waste my time and that of anyone who's reading. Hit 'Em Up, though, was and remains a hell of a thing, and has become a cultural artifact.
There have been plenty of other diss tracks before and after that have cut deep with personal humiliation or threatened lives. It's the context. The time, the place, the circumstances, the visibility, the participants, and the influence. You're really trying to downplay the highest profile diss track of all time (with an incredibly incendiary video to match)? You're gonna tell me that notable artists are slinging anything like this at each other anymore? No. Not when there are real stakes. And it's a conscious decision. Everyone would rather sip Ace of Spades at the club and enjoy success with a pulse than get zipped up in a body bag over words that can't be taken back, and for good reason.
Who wouldn't want 90's Suge dead? He was ruthless, a dirtbag. He basically said he had people injected with HIV/AIDS needles on Jimmy Kimmel. It really isn't a stretch to imagine he hyped Pac into escalating the beef. You don't want a wildcard like that around, coming at you or your artists.why did puff want suge dead?
Puff daddy's bodyguard (I think) killed suges best friend allegedly. So suge knight allegedly kidnapped one of pd's freinds made him drink piss and tourtured him to give up pd's moms address.why did puff want suge dead?
It's pretty wild that he had Madonna running intel on Haitian Jack. Shows how close they were at one point if she had access to his personal life like that.So crazy that he's asking her about Haitian jack in the letter...
Preemptive hit. He was convinced Suge was coming for him so he struck first. Bodies were already dropping before Pac's murder. Pac's killing sparked further back and forth gang murders in LA.why did puff want suge dead?
There's a thing called context. Which is why I provided it. People say worse things to each other every day. We could go harder at each other right now in this thread, without much effort; I have millions of words under my belt trolling idiots on the internet and people form communities around their mutual salt for me, so it's not like I revere Hit 'Em Up as the holy grail of personal attacks on a lyrical level. But if we had a verbal exchange here it just wouldn't, y'know, matter at all, no one would care, and it would waste my time and that of anyone who's reading. Hit 'Em Up, though, was and remains a hell of a thing, and has become a cultural artifact.
There have been plenty of other diss tracks before and after that have cut deep with personal humiliation or threatened lives. It's the context. The time, the place, the circumstances, the visibility, the participants, and the influence. You're really trying to downplay the highest profile diss track of all time (with an incredibly incendiary video to match)? You're gonna tell me that notable artists are slinging anything like this at each other anymore? No. Not when there are real stakes. And it's a conscious decision. Everyone would rather sip Ace of Spades at the club and enjoy success with a pulse than get zipped up in a body bag over words that can't be taken back, and for good reason.
Schattenjäger;242904757 said:
What. Grabbing ass is equivalent to woman beating?Sure it is. I'm sure all that domestic violence stuff with Dre' is made up too right? Just because they did horrible things doesn't take away from their artistic work.
Yeah I don't see that for 2pac, he was a positive force in this world, he was trying to neutralise gang wars, he was trying to Change the world, free shows in broken down communities and asking people to donate to give to the community, talking to the communities to uplift society
Dude was 25, he was barely started with where he was going, death row east etc
Is this sarcasm?
Song was written and released ( on mix tapes) before he diedThey were afraid to say anything until he died. P continued to rack up L's for the rest of his career. RIP tho.
There's a thing called context. Which is why I provided it. People say worse things to each other every day. We could go harder at each other right now in this thread, without much effort; I have millions of words under my belt trolling idiots on the internet and people form communities around their mutual salt for me, so it's not like I revere Hit 'Em Up as the holy grail of personal attacks on a lyrical level. But if we had a verbal exchange here it just wouldn't, y'know, matter at all, no one would care, and it would waste my time and that of anyone who's reading. Hit 'Em Up, though, was and remains a hell of a thing, and has become a cultural artifact.
There have been plenty of other diss tracks before and after that have cut deep with personal humiliation or threatened lives. It's the context. The time, the place, the circumstances, the visibility, the participants, and the influence. You're really trying to downplay the highest profile diss track of all time (with an incredibly incendiary video to match)? You're gonna tell me that notable artists are slinging anything like this at each other anymore? No. Not when there are real stakes. And it's a conscious decision. Everyone would rather sip Ace of Spades at the club and enjoy success with a pulse than get zipped up in a body bag over words that can't be taken back, and for good reason.
First, you assume that Tupac glorified the "gangster" lifestyle but can you demonstrate how he did so through his lyrics? Or perhaps it was through his clothing choices, the way he spoke, the fact he chose to carry a gun, or that he smoked a lot of weed?