Bethesda the worst? I don't see how this asgrerf dfdb
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Ubisoft E3 2015 Press Conference Thread
- Thread starter Lavalamp1138
- Start date
Bethesda the worst? I don't see how this asgrerf dfdb
Interceptor
Banned
The developer chat right now is a big plus as well. They all seem to be genuinely motivated to talk about their games.
Big difference to MS.
NullPointer
Member
A full graphical overhaul? I'd bet many of the game's buyers asked for that and never expected it.
AHA-Lambda
Member
This, she herself is not bad, I like her in Archer alot but in this format, she comes across terribly, and her jokes stick out like a sore thumb and are incredibly cringe worthy.
Fucking shit girlwood meme feels all in yo bones!
Eugh.
ftfty
Jokes aside, completely agree with that ranking so far. Hoping Sony will get close to the NWC.
MyNameIsRye
Member
Some of you guys have really weird expectations for Press Conferences.
The only one I would consider bad was EA. Ubisoft was Great...Bethesda was Great, Microsoft was pretty good as well.
Way to high of expectations.
The only one I would consider bad was EA. Ubisoft was Great...Bethesda was Great, Microsoft was pretty good as well.
Way to high of expectations.
At least Ubisoft didnt turn all of them into generic games, even though it can sure look like it. The old Splinter Cell-games were amazing, and Chaos Theory is among the best ever and far from generic (even though the story still kinda is).
Barry Burton
Member
Ubisoft presents Tom Clancy's Ubisoft.
I will probably play one of those games, and skip the rest. There's just too much damn overlap with their games. Ghost Recon looks like it could be the most comprehensive of their's
I'd rate them like this so far:
Bethesda: B+
Microsoft: B-
Ubisoft: C
EA: D
Which isn't so bad, considering Sony, Nintendo and Square-Enix are the ones I was most looking forward to.
I will probably play one of those games, and skip the rest. There's just too much damn overlap with their games. Ghost Recon looks like it could be the most comprehensive of their's
I'd rate them like this so far:
Bethesda: B+
Microsoft: B-
Ubisoft: C
EA: D
Which isn't so bad, considering Sony, Nintendo and Square-Enix are the ones I was most looking forward to.
StealthGoblin
Banned
George Broussard has basically said that what we saw of Hololens was a sham. What we saw on screen is not what the guy wearing hololens saw. He saw a much narrower FOV.
NinjamicWZ
Banned
Yeah, Dynasty Souls has much potential. Really liked the groundwork so far.
Bethesda Game Studios suck, so no interest in Fallout. Dishonored I didn't enjoy, and I'm not getting excited for a hype trailer. DOOM looks like a console shooter... What else was there? Oh yeah, TES:O... No. Hearthstone!
Their presentation was also weaker than any of the conferences today.
DontBeThatGuy
Member
It's not that bad, man, but some people just can't help but cringe incessantly at the slightest bit of awkwardness.
Pattycakes
Banned
Microsoft?
Riposte
Member
People really rate Bethesda high, I assume it's solely on the strength of 2 or 3 games (Fallout, Dishonored (CG trailer), and maybe Doom, which looked more promising in multiplayer than single, although not terrible). The only other games, not counting remasters, were Elder Scrolls Online and the really bad looking Battlecry.
ZeronosVega
Member
Those are my thoughts and rating as well, although I would rank Bethesda a bit lower personally as only Fallout 4 was of interest to me.
AHA-Lambda
Member
But it's not slight and it's constant.
It's not like that Unravel guy who was awkward but obviously really nervous.
Interceptor
Banned
Quick nap then over to Sony! Already 1:30 am over here...DontBeThatGuy
Member
Back in an hour, Giant Bomb? For some reason I thought Sony started at 8 EST. DAMNIT!
Uno Venova
Banned
I really don't see how Bethesda was significantly better than any one of these mostly underwhelming conferences, I'd put them all on the same mediocre level with EA being rock bottom.
Canis lupus
Member
Bethesda: 5/10
Microsoft: 5/10
EA: 4/10
Ubisoft: 5/10
Meh to kinda fine conferences so far, no surprises, no new IPs, more games that look and play the same. Also no new UbiArt game, and BG&E2, where are you....
Microsoft: 5/10
EA: 4/10
Ubisoft: 5/10
Meh to kinda fine conferences so far, no surprises, no new IPs, more games that look and play the same. Also no new UbiArt game, and BG&E2, where are you....
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
They will when gamers stop lapping them up.
Disaster Nebraska
Banned
Too samey. I feel like they're going to be eating their own lunch with so many games sharing a similar style and also being open world. Why would I dump tons of hours into - for instance - The Division when I could also play Ghost Recon Wildlands, or the new Rainbow Six? I get it. These games are not identical, but it does feel very samey. And then Yet Another AC Game rounds out the open-world offerings? Seems like too much.
Good on them to make another South Park RPG, though.
Good on them to make another South Park RPG, though.
DontBeThatGuy
Member
If you say so.
Environments in Xenoblade X are looking excellent tho... But yeah the faces on the characters are just ugh... It's like they hired a random 14 year kid from deviant art on the fanart anime section to be the character artist on this game.
True... But at least their CGI trailers are genuinely beautiful. Especially their characters and those crazy haircuts.
I was really surprised by this, especially after the success of Valiant Hearts & Child of Light.
NullPointer
Member
When that finally happens the series will be as dead as a doornail.
But then they could always reboot it the next year ;p
-duskdoll-
Member
Well they did impress me and i'm not an MS fan, so that's something. I think BC will make it easier for people to transition to the current gen, but yeah they need to approve more games for it to matter.
AHA-Lambda
Member
Actually bugger it, thinking on it, for as much as EA was filled to the brim with sports and was poorly paced, it had more interesting games (to me anyway), so I do think Ubi was the worst.
Bethesda 8/10
MS 7/10
Ubi 3/10
EA 4/10
Bethesda 8/10
MS 7/10
Ubi 3/10
EA 4/10
Mushroomer25
Member
Ubisoft - A weak conference, but better in the shadow of EA's disaster.
+For Honor seems interesting. Some innovation at play in the sword combat
+Trackmania looks very neat.
+Despite the constant lies, their closer game seemed kind of impressive.
-Siege is just kind of boring to watch
-MEEEEEEEMEEEES
-Even Ubisoft is over Assassin's Creed
-No Beyond Good & Evil 2. Ubisoft will always lose a point for this until they make it right.
-Dancing.
C-. Weak. Could've been weaker, though.
+For Honor seems interesting. Some innovation at play in the sword combat
+Trackmania looks very neat.
+Despite the constant lies, their closer game seemed kind of impressive.
-Siege is just kind of boring to watch
-MEEEEEEEMEEEES
-Even Ubisoft is over Assassin's Creed
-No Beyond Good & Evil 2. Ubisoft will always lose a point for this until they make it right.
-Dancing.
C-. Weak. Could've been weaker, though.
DontBeThatGuy
Member
Bethesda managed to bore me even with the Giant Bomb guys talking over it.
Fbh
Member
That's only really true for the Tom Clancy games. The new Rainbow Six in particular looked like "The Division: Mexico"
But the other reveals? One is a South Park title, there is a medieval melee focused online game and a racer about crazy tracks
Oh, sorry. B.
NWC could be B+ perhaps. I'm unsure.
Sounds about right for me as well.
Had no expectations to these conferences and somehow I still walked away dissapointed, odd.
Trackmania did look rad though.
Maintenance
Member
NWC: 8.5
Bethesda: 8
MS:7
EA: 4
Ubi: 5
Bethesda: 8
MS:7
EA: 4
Ubi: 5
CharminUltra
Member
Genvieve Forget