Drizzlehell
Banned
Now, while it is a fair criticism that Ubisoft games often reuse similar tropes and gameplay features, and it's easy to get burned out on those epically long games with ginormous open worlds if you attempt to play all of them back-to-back, I would argue that the impact of this homogenization may vary depending on your personal familiarity with multiple Ubisoft franchises.
I recently came to rethink my stance on this a little bit, and allow me to share an anecdote for context.
What came to me as a big surprise recently, is when my brother told me that he really got into the recent Ghost Recon games, big time. And I'm talking about hundreds of hours spent across Wildlands and Breakpoint, just bumbling around those games' open worlds. What was surprising about it is that I could never ever convince him to ever pick up any of the other Ubisoft games before, no matter how much I would praise them for their storytelling or gameplay. Mostly I wanted him to try out Far Cry 3 and Blood Dragon but he just found them cringeworthy and uninteresting, not to mention that he just hates vast majority of open world games. But when I asked him what on earth changed his mind when it came to Ghost Recon, he simply said that he digs the military theme. Also he's a huge Tom Clancy geek, so go figure.
Anyway, the moral of the story is that there is nothing inherently wrong with the Ubisoft formula itself and it can work for anyone, provided that you find a game with that special hook that will reel you in.
While it's perfectly valid to expect something completely different out of each of their franchises, Ubisoft simply figured out blueprint that works for most of their games. Therefore, their main focus now is in diversifying the themes and settings - you'll either find all of their franchises interesting, or you may only vibe with one or two of them. But once you do, it's pretty much guaranteed that you'll be happy to spend hundreds of hours just plowing through all that nebulous content. It only ever becomes a problem if you start to play through every single one of their franchises and start to notice all the similarities shared across them. But again, this doesn't really make them bad. I would even say that some of their games are nothing short of amazing.
I recently came to rethink my stance on this a little bit, and allow me to share an anecdote for context.
What came to me as a big surprise recently, is when my brother told me that he really got into the recent Ghost Recon games, big time. And I'm talking about hundreds of hours spent across Wildlands and Breakpoint, just bumbling around those games' open worlds. What was surprising about it is that I could never ever convince him to ever pick up any of the other Ubisoft games before, no matter how much I would praise them for their storytelling or gameplay. Mostly I wanted him to try out Far Cry 3 and Blood Dragon but he just found them cringeworthy and uninteresting, not to mention that he just hates vast majority of open world games. But when I asked him what on earth changed his mind when it came to Ghost Recon, he simply said that he digs the military theme. Also he's a huge Tom Clancy geek, so go figure.
Anyway, the moral of the story is that there is nothing inherently wrong with the Ubisoft formula itself and it can work for anyone, provided that you find a game with that special hook that will reel you in.
While it's perfectly valid to expect something completely different out of each of their franchises, Ubisoft simply figured out blueprint that works for most of their games. Therefore, their main focus now is in diversifying the themes and settings - you'll either find all of their franchises interesting, or you may only vibe with one or two of them. But once you do, it's pretty much guaranteed that you'll be happy to spend hundreds of hours just plowing through all that nebulous content. It only ever becomes a problem if you start to play through every single one of their franchises and start to notice all the similarities shared across them. But again, this doesn't really make them bad. I would even say that some of their games are nothing short of amazing.
Last edited:
