*sigh*
To think these guys just hosted an Olympics. It's really insane.
1936 Berlin Olympics.
*sigh*
To think these guys just hosted an Olympics. It's really insane.
You have a large base in Japan. The Russian's wouldn't dare. Now if you didn't have a base. You would do jackshit.
In comparison with some other countries who are growing their militaries, the US is quickly weakening. It is not just a domestic equation.
Others are growing faster and more efficiently. And that is not just a "boots on the ground" growth. It is tech, equipment, resource deals etc.
Look at what China is doing with their military on 1/5th the money and WAAAAAY less debt.
Two Russian warships have been spotted near Sevastopol, according to Reuters.
Jesus Christ, this is really happening, isn't it?
You mean the Sarah Palin who predicted in 2008 that Russia would end up invading Ukraine, and everyone said she was an idiot for even suggesting such a thing?
1936 Berlin Olympics.
Oh yes we would, but that's exactly why we have a base there. You don't wait until the shit hits the fan to build defenses.
hilarious.
Japan has already started to do just that. With the increased hostilities with China, Japan didn't turn to the U.S. for more assurances...they increased their defense budget by 6x.
No nuclear power would directly attack another nuclear power. Since you have a base there Japan is a no-go for Russia or China.
You mean like on the Balkans?This is more of a European conflict which means nothing really will happen from the West. I'm not even sure if there would be economic sanctions since it could motivate Russia to sell more arms to Afghanistan and other such deals.
Came here to post this.1936 Berlin Olympics.
Fine but if they're going to do that, this situation shouldn't change anything about that discussion. Also, believe me it means something. You think if Russia or anyone else would invade Japan we would just sit there with our thumb up our ass?
Two Russian warships have been spotted near Sevastopol, according to Reuters.
Jesus Christ, this is really happening, isn't it?
We (Austria) might be able to help further. We have like two 10 year old planes and a tank or two.
I was writting this regarding to this news and forgot to delete the ship stuff, sry
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/01/us-ukraine-crisis-military-idUSBREA200UG20140301
If we didn't have a base there, but still had the same kind of treaty, think again.
Lockheed[/B], Boeing, Northrop, etc.
Do you mean a general war between great powers? Or any army that has fought another?When was the last time the world has seen a full on Army v. Army war?
1936 Berlin Olympics.
Do you mean a general war between great powers? Or any army that has fought another?
You don't know much about the FIFA right? They don't give a shit about anything.Speaking of which I hope the 2018 World Cup in Russia is now taken off them.
Those treaties are meaningless. You have no appetite for war. The Russian's know this and will ride roughshod all over it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u816y0jUUmE
This polish scientist in America uses all the information Russia revealed about the crash to prove that everything they said was bullshit. Not to mention there was evidence of shots being fired before the plane crashed and the evidence was tampered with. It was examined in Russia before going to Poland. Bodies weren't returned when families asked for them. There whole thing is a massive cover up.
Why is it ethnical discrimination assimilating foreigners into Ukrainians? If I were to move to the US shouldn't I feel like US is my country? Did all the blacks live in a single state in the USA?
Yes they share a lot in common (language, similar genetics) but they have differentiated enough from each other to be two distinct nations.
Only if it's during office hours though.Relax guys...Switzerland has got this one. They have been patiently waiting and now its their time to unleash their military might.
Interesting indeed, particularly if there's a possibility of cover for a bit of NATO brinksmanship in the Black Sea. Brass nethers to schedule a parade like that, however, and would almost certainly ratchet up tensions to an uncomfortable degree. Something to consider further down the line if Russia continues to abuse Ukraine.This would be... interesting:
http://nahnews.com.ua/turkey-is-ready-to-put-a-claim-for-the-crimea-in-case-of-division-of-ukraine/
In comparison with some other countries who are growing their militaries, the US is quickly weakening. It is not just a domestic equation.
Others are growing faster and more efficiently. And that is not just a "boots on the ground" growth. It is tech, equipment, resource deals etc.
Look at what China is doing with their military on 1/5th the money and WAAAAAY less debt.
Speaking of which I hope the 2018 World Cup in Russia is now taken off them.
- Increasing all intelligence-gathering functions through satellite, Predator unmanned vehicles, and especially cyber.
- Using the NATO-Ukrainian Council and existing military partnerships with the Ukrainian military to share information, intelligence, and situational awareness with authorities in Kiev.
- Providing advice to Ukrainian armed forces to prepare and position themselves in the event of further conflict.
- Developing NATO contingency plans to react to full-scale invasion of Ukraine and to a partial invasion likely of Crimea. NATO contingency planning can be cumbersome, but in Libya it moved quickly.
- Assigning one of the NATO Joint Force Commands (either Naples, Italy, or Brunsum, Netherlands) into direct overwatch of the situation.
- Standing up NATO crisis centers to full manning, especially at SHAPE and the relevant Joint Force Command.
- Ensuring that the Land and Maritime Component Commands (Northwood in the United Kingdom and Izmir, Turkey, respectively) are conducting prudent planning in their areas of expertise and feeding their analysis to the Joint Force Command.
- Bringing the NATO Response Force, a 25,000 man sea, air, land, special forces capability to a higher state of alert.
- Convening allies with cyber-capabilities (this is not a NATO specialty) to consider options -- at a minimum to defend Ukraine if it is attacked in this domain (as Georgia was).
- Sailing NATO maritime forces into the Black Sea and setting up contingency plans for their use.
You mean the Sarah Palin who predicted in 2008 that Russia would end up invading Ukraine, and everyone said she was an idiot for even suggesting such a thing?
When was the last time the world has seen a full on Army v. Army war?
I'm not too well versed on this subject, but why is Russia invading, does anyone know for sure? Have they issued any statements? Do they just want Crimea?
You mean like on the Balkans?
In his book The Clinton Tapes: Wrestling History with the President from 2009, historian and author Taylor Branch, a long-time friend of former United States president Bill Clinton, made public more than 70 recorded sessions with the president during his presidency from 1993 through 2001:
Clinton said U.S. allies in Europe blocked proposals to adjust or remove the embargo. They justified their opposition on plausible humanitarian grounds, arguing that more arms would only fuel the bloodshed, but privately, said the president, key allies objected that an independent Bosnia would be "unnatural" as the only Muslim nation in Europe. He said they favored the embargo precisely because it locked in Bosnia's disadvantage. [..] When I expressed shock at such cynicism, reminiscent of the blind-eye diplomacy regarding the plight of Europe's Jews during World War II, President Clinton only shrugged. He said President François Mitterrand of France had been especially blunt in saying that Bosnia did not belong, and that British officials also spoke of a painful but realistic restoration of Christian Europe. Against Britain and France, he said, German chancellor Helmut Kohl among others had supported moves to reconsider the United Nations arms embargo, failing in part because Germany did not hold a seat on the U.N. Security Council.
—Taylor Branch, excerpt from his book- The Clinton Tapes: Wrestling History with the President[56]
The Bosnian government lobbied to have the embargo lifted but that was opposed by the United Kingdom, France and Russia. US proposals to pursue this policy were known as lift and strike. The US congress passed two resolutions calling for the embargo to be lifted but both were vetoed by President Bill Clinton for fear of creating a rift between the US and the aforementioned countries. Nonetheless, the United States used both "black" C-130 transports and back channels including Islamist groups to smuggle weapons to Bosnian-Muslim forces via Croatia.[53] Inter Services Intelligence played active role during 1992-1995 and secretly supplied the Muslim fighters with arms, ammunition and guided anti tank missiles to give them a fighting chance against the aggression.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosnian_War#Summary
You mean the Sarah Palin who predicted in 2008 that Russia would end up invading Ukraine, and everyone said she was an idiot for even suggesting such a thing?
Of course not. But if Japan got into a naval clash on its northern border, say over fishing rights for Japanese fishermen in the disputed Kuril Islands area, would the US intervene on Japan's behalf? Same in the East China Sea, if the JMSDF got into a clash with the PLA Navy near the Senkakus would the US REALLY assist or would it come up with some excuse in order not to risk upsetting its largest creditor?
She didn't say anything, she was told what to say.
Where was this?
Oh really? Is that why Lockheed Marietta up the street from my office is losing jobs left and right? Defense contracts are getting cancelled, orders are shrinking.
Proof on all accounts.
Your conclusion makes no sense. Of course a nation that was way behind the military tech race would be growing faster once it started to modernize than the US who was already at the forefront of military tech. That doesnt mean that the United States is weakening, it simply means that other nations are buying and investing in military tech that is already out there.
And more efficiently? Where the hell is the proof of that? Just because China is a totalitarian regime does not mean that its more efficient than the US. The bureaucracy in China is not something that I would call efficient.
Not sure what debt has to do with it either.
Are you insinuating that China is at the same debt level and military expenditure levels as the US? They simply are not. And anyone following the news in the last 3 years knows that China has been on a military push.
Are you also saying that Chinese tech companies are mired in unionization and other NA business practices that bloat military spending? Again, China is under a different system.
Dollar for dollar, I guarantee China is getting more bang for their buck in military spending.
They are making technology advances at a faster and more efficient rate than the US has.
Now what I am not saying is that China is at the level of the US militarily, so don't get me wrong there.
I am saying that they are growing faster and more efficiently than the US is. That coupled with crippling debt in the US and many domestic/foreign problems, China's military is growing in strength, and the US is weakening in relative terms.
This has been pouring out of the headlines for years now...but I guess if you want me to go find debt numbers/military spending/tech/US military operation articles of the US vs. China, I can.
1936 Berlin Olympics.
Speaking of which I hope the 2018 World Cup in Russia is now taken off them.
Speaking of which I hope the 2018 World Cup in Russia is now taken off them.
Trying too hard. US is miles ahead technologically because of decades of spending 20x as much as everyone else on conventional warfare tech. What you saw in Iraq and Afghanistan is no indication of what they are capable of in a true war.
Hm are there any new news about new Russian forces landing on Crimea? It looks like nothing new after morning 'shipment'.
You should really read about FIFA and how 'transparent' they are.
You don't believe that a nations debt doesn't directly affect their ability to enter and maintain a military operation? I mean, how much more debt could the US possibly go into before it collapses completely? Not much, I wager.
Trying too hard. US is miles ahead technologically because of decades of spending 20x as much as everyone else on conventional warfare tech. What you saw in Iraq and Afghanistan is no indication of what they are capable of in a true war.
Speaking of which I hope the 2018 World Cup in Russia is now taken off them.
You don't believe that a nations debt doesn't directly affect their ability to enter and maintain a military operation? I mean, how much more debt could the US possibly go into before it collapses completely? Not much, I wager.
The conventional way for debt scaremongers to measure the national debt is to compare gross public debt to GDP. But the normal way you measure the debt load of a business or a household is to ask for a net figure. Just because you have hundreds of thousands of dollars in mortgage debt doesn't mean you're a pauper. In fact it probably means you're a rich person who owns an expensive house. It is of course possible to take out a large mortgage and then end up "underwater" because house prices decline, but it's simply not the case that a large amount of gross debt is a sign of overextension. It's typically a sign of prosperity and creditworthiness.